¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ / v.3, no.1, 1960³â, pp.1-15
Persicaria Japonica (MISSNER) Gross et NakaiÀÇ ÀÌÇüÈ­¿Í ¼öÁ¤·Â¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸
( STUDIES ON THE DIMORPHISM AND FERTILITY OF PERSICARIA JAPONICA (MEISSNER) GROSS ET NAKAI )
; ;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
P. japonica°¡ ºÐ·ùÇп¡¼­ ¸»ÇÏ´Â°Å¿Í °°ÀÌ ¸®¿õÀÌÁÖ°¡ ¾ÊÀ̰í ÀÌÇüÈ£Àå¹°À̶ó´Â °ÍÀ» ÈǰßÇÏ°í ¼ö³â°£ ÀÌ ½Ä¹°ÀÇ ÀåÁÖÈ­°³Ã¼, ´ÜÁÖÈ­°³Ã¼°£ÀÇ È­±âÀÇ ÇüÅÂ, ¼öÁ¤·Â, È­ºÐ°üÀÇ Çൿ ¹× L, SÁÖÀÇ È­ºÐÀÇ ÀÓ, ºÒÀÓµîÀ» Á¶»çÇØ º¸¾Òµå´Ï ÀÌ ½Ä¹°Àº ÀÌÇü¼öÀå¹°Áß¿¡¼­µµ L, SÁÖ°£ÀÇ ºÐÈ­°¡ °¡Àå ½ÉÇÏ°Ô µÇ¾î ÀÖ¾î ÀϺαâ°üÀ̳ª ±â´ÉÀº ¿õ¿õÀÌÁÖ¿Í °°ÀÌ º¯Çعö¸° Ư¼öÇÑ ÀÌÇü¼öÀå¹°À̶ó´Â °ÍÀÌ ¸í¹éÈ÷ µÇ¾ú°í ÀÌ Àå¹°Àº Àå¹°Á¶Æ÷ü¼¼´ëÀÇ ¼ºÀÇ ºÐÈ­°¡ »ý±â´Âµ¥ ÀÌÇüÇö»óÀ» °ÅÃļ­ µÇ´Â °æ¿ìµµ ÀÖÁö ¾Ê³ª ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ» °¡Á¤ÄÉÇÏ´Â ÇÑ Áõ°Å°¡ µÉ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù°í »ý°¢µÈ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ¿©²î°úÀÇ ´Ù¸¥ ÀÌÇü¿¹Àå¹°ÀÎ F. esculentumÀ̳ª P. senticosa¿Í ºñ±³ÇØ º¸¸é ÀÌ Àå¹°ÀÌ °¡Àå L, S ÁÖ°£ÀÇ ºÐÈ­°¡ ½ÉÇϰí F. esculentumÀº Áß°£, P. senticosa´Â °¡Àå ¹ÌºÐÈ­»óÅ¿¡ ÀÖ¾î »ïÁ¾¿Ü ¿©²î°ú ÀÌÇü¿¹Àå¹°°£¿¡ ±× ºÐÈ­ÀÇ Á¤µµ¿¡ gradationÀÌ »ý°Ü ÀÖ´Ù. ÀÌÁ¦ ½ÇÇè°á°ú¸­ ¿ä¾àÇÏ¸é ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. 1) P. japonica´Â È­ÁÖÀå, È­»çÀå, µîÀÇ Á¦ÀÏÂ÷ÀÇ ÇüÅÂÀû Â÷À̻Ӹ¸ ¾ÊÀ̶ó Á¦ÀÌÂ÷Àû ÇüÀ̵µ ´ë´ÜÈ÷ ½ÉÇÑ DimorphismÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»°í ÀÖ´Ù. 2) L, SÁÖÀÇ È­±âÀÇ Â÷ÀÌ´Â µ¿°úÀÇ Å¸ÀÌÇü¿¹ÀÛ¹°¿¡ ºñÇØ ±Ø°æÈ£ ºÐÈ­µÇ¾î ÀÖ´Ù. 3) L, SÁÖÀÇ ¿õ¿¹¸¦ º¸¸é SÁÖ´Â ´ë´ÜÈ÷ ¹ß´ÞµÇ¾î ÀÖ´Â ¹Ý¸é¿¡ LÁÖÀÇ ¿õ¿¹´Â ¾Ö¿¹µÈ°Í °°Àº ´À³¦À» ÁÖ°í ÀÖ´Ù. 4) Àû¹ý¼öºÐ¿¡ ÀÇÇϸé L, SÁÖ°¡ ´Ù °á½ÇÀÌ Àß µÇÁö¸¸ ºÒÀû¹ý¼öºÐ¿¡¼­´Â ¼öÁ¤°á½ÇÀÌ ÀüÇô ¾ÈµÈ´Ù. ¼öÁ¤»ý¸®»óÀ¸·Îµµ ¶Ñ·ÇÇÑ ÀÌÇü¿¹ÀÛ¹°ÀÌ´Ù. 5) ÀÚ°¡°¡ÀÓÀÇ ¼ºÁú ¶Ç´Â µ¿ÇüÈ­°£ÀÇ ¼öÁ¤·ÂÀº ¿ÏÀüÈ÷ »ó½ÇÇϰí ÀÖ´Ù. ¿©²î°úÀÇ Å¸ÀÌÇü¿¹ÀÛ¹°°ú´Â ÀÌ Á¡¿¡ Â÷À̰¡ ½ÉÇÏ´Ù. 6) ÀÚ¿¬»óÅÂÇÏ¿¡ À־´Â SÁÖ´Â °á½ÇÀÌ °ÅÀÌ ¾ÈµÇ¾î ¸¶Ä¡ ulcornerÁÖ¿Í¿Í °°Àº ¿Ü°üÀ» ³ªÅ³»°í ÀÖ´Ù. 7) Àΰø¼öºÐ¿¡¼­´Â $L{ imes}S$³ª $S{ imes}L$ ÁÖ ¼öÁ¤°á½ÇÀÌ ´Ù µÇ¾î SÁÖÀÇ ÇൿÀº ÀÚ¿¬»óÅÂÇÏ¿¡¼­ ¿Í´Â ´ë´ÜÈ÷ »óÀÌÇÏ´Ù. 8) LÁÖ¿¡ ºñÇØ SÁÖ´Â ¼öÁ¤ÈÄ ¿ë°ú°¡ ´õ ½ÉÇÏ´Ù. 9) È­ºÐ°üÀÇ ÇൿÀº ¼öÁ¤·Â°ú ¿ÏÀüÈ÷ ÀÏÄ¡µÈ´Ù. Áï L-selfing, $L{ imes}L$, S-selfing, $S{ imes}S$µîÀÇ ºÎÀû¹ý ¼öºÐ¿¡¼­´Â È­ºÐ°üÀº È­ÁÖÀÇ ¹ÌÁß¿¡¼­ Á¤ÁöµÇÁö¸¸ $L{ imes}S$, $S{ imes}L$,¿¡¼­´Â ¼öºÐ ¾à 40-50ºÐ ÈÄÀ̸é È­ºÐ°üÀº ÀÚ¹æ±îÁö µµ´ÞµÈ´Ù. 10) SÁÖ´Â ¿õº»À¸·Î ¿ÀÀεǾî ÀÖÁö¸¸ ÀÎÀ§Àû¹ý¼öºÐÀ» ÇÏ¸é ¼öÁ¤·ÂÀ̳ª È­ºÐ°üÀÇ ÇൿÀº LÁÖ¿¡¼­¿Í µ¿ÀÏÇÏ´Ù. 11) SÈ­ºÐÀº ¿ÏÀüÇÏÁö¸¸ LÈ­ºÐÀº ¾à 70%°¡ ³»¿ë°øÇãÇÑ Adortive pollen ÀÌ´Ù. 12) LÈ­ºÐÁß ³ª¸ÓÁö 30%µµ SÈ­ºÐ¿¡ ºñÇØ¼­ ¿°»öµµ°¡ ³·Àº°ÍÀÌ ¸¹°í SÈ­ºÐ °°ÀÌ ³ó¿°µÇ´Â °ÍÀº ±ØÈ÷ ¼Ò¼öÀÌ´Ù. 13) º»Àå¹°Àº ºÐÈ­°¡ °íµµ·Î ÁøÇàµÈ ÀüÇüÀûÀÎ ÀÌÇü¿¹ÀÛ¹°ÀÌ¿© ¸¶Ä¡ Dimorphism ¿¡¼­ Dioecious ¿¡·Î ÀÌÇàµÇ´Â ¼ö°¡ ÀÖ´Ù´Â °ÍÀ» Ç¥½ÃÇÏ´Â Áõ°Å°¡ µÇ´Â °Í °°´Ù.
HARN, Chang Yawl : Studies on the dimorphism and Fertility of Persicaria japonica (MEISSNER) Gross et Nakai. Kor Jour. Bot. 3(I) 1-15 1960 Numerous investigations, since the works of DARWIN, have been made regarding the heterostylous plants by JOST (1907), CORRENS (1924), LAIBACK (1924), LEWIS (1943), and many others. Studies on the heterostylous Polygomum, however, were not reported except for the buckwhent, Fagopyrum esculentum, which was investigated by SCHOCH-BODMER (1930), EAST (1934), FROLOVA & Co-Workers (1946), MORRIS (1947, 1951) TATEBE (1949, 1951, 1953), present author (1957), and others. It is because no heterostylous species, besides buckwheat, have been known to exist in the Polygonum family. The author, during his studies on both heterostylism and fertility of Polygonaceae, has found that the species, persicaria japonica (Meissner) Gross et Nakai, is not diecious as has been known in taxonomy, but in reality beterostylous both morphologically and physiologically. It was found that this plant, regarded by taxonomist, as a male plant setting no seed, actually set seed (botanical fruit) when legitimate combination was made. Since his brief report on the dimorphic phenomens of this plant in 1956, the author's further research on the manner of fertilization has revealed that this species is a peculiar type whose dimorphism has undergone extreme specialization structurally and physiologically, the short-styled individual behaving in nature as a male plant and the long-styled individual, as female, whereas in controllled pollination the plant shows highly differentiated typical dimorphism. When compared with the other dimorphous species of this family, F. esculentum and P. sentiosa. it has been clarified that these three species differ in the degree of differentiation of their dimorphism morphologically and physiologically. That is, P. japonica has developed such a high specialization as to mislead the taxonomists, while P. senticosa shows almost no noticeable difference between long- and shortstyled individuals retaining most of the inherent physiological character cmmon to the genus except for the fact that it has two forms of flowers. F. esculentum appears to have taken the intermediate position in every respect. The result obtained in the present experiment are summarized as follows: 1) P. japonica has two kinds of individuals, one long style-short stamened; the other, short style-long stamened. The floral structure of this plants shows typical characteristics of dimorphic heterostylism. The differentiation between the two forms of flower has proceeded so highly both in primary and secondary difference of flower structure that this may be regarded as the most specialized form of dimorphism. 2) The differences of floral structure between the long and short styled individuals are remarkable compared with the other dimorphic species of the family. 3) The stamens of long styled plants show the sign of deteriolation whereas those of the short styled flower are well-developed. 4) When legitimate combinations are made, both L- and S-styled individuals are fertilized well and set seed (fruit), while in the illegitimate combination no fertilization and seed setting occur. Physiologically this species exhibits the typical behavior of dimorphic plants. 5) The self-fertile character, so common in other species of the other non-heterostyle Polygonum family, has disappeared completely. 6) Under natural conditions, no or few seed setting is observed in short styled individuals that behave as if they were male plants. 7) In hand pollination, the combination of both $L{ imes}S$ and $S{ imes}L$ alike yield relatively good fertility and seed-formation, the behavior of short styled individuals in artificial pollination differing remarkably from that in nature. 8) Under controlled pollination, $L{ imes}S$ combination sets far more seed than in the combination of $S{ imes}L$. In the S-styled individuals, the fertilized flower has the tendency of its seed more readily falling off in every stage of seed development than in the L-styled individuals. 9) The behaviors of pollen tubes just parallels the results of fertility test. That is, in the illegitimate combination, L-selfed, $L{ imes}L$, S-selfed, and $S{ imes}S$, the growth of pollen tubes is checked in the style, while in legitimately combined $L{ imes}S$ and $S{ imes}L$, the pollen tubes grow well reaching the ovaries within 40-50 minutes after pollination. The response of short styled individuals, known as male plant among taxonomists, is identical, as far as behavior fo pollen tube growth and fertilization are concerned, to that of long styled individuals, the so-called female plant. 10) The pollen grains from the short-styled plants are complete and fertile, whereas 70% of those of L-styled are found to be abortive, i.e., empty contents. 11) The remaining 30% of pollen of L-plant shows varied degree of stainability when stained with iron-aceto-carmine......mostly light red, while the pollen grains of S-style individuals are dark brown indicating complete fertility and viability. 12) The abundance of sterile pollen in L-styled and the nature of seed-dropping which occurs in S-styled individuals appear to be the main causes why the short styled individuals bear no seed in nature. Under controlled legitimate union, $S{ imes}L$, the careful and elaborate pollination would give the S-styoled flowers the opportunities to receive the fertile pollens, though few in number, from L-styled plant, thus enabling S-plant to bear seed. 13) This species is not dioecious as is regarded by taxonomists, but typical dimorphic plant which has so highly specialized in floral structures and funcitons that the long-styled plant behaves just like a female individual; and the short-styled, like a male.
 
Ű¿öµå
 
Journal of Plant Biology / v.3, no.1, 1960³â, pp.1-15
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-9239
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO196011920110201)
¾ð¾î : ¿µ¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿