¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ / v.6, no.5, 2005³â, pp.186-192
°Ç¼³°ø»çÀÇ È¯°æ°ü¸®ºñ¿ë °è»ó ¹× ¿î¿ë ½ÇÅ ºÐ¼®
( The Fact-finding and Analysis of the Environmental Management Cost in Construction Projects )
Ãֹμö;°­¿î»ê; Çѱ¹°Ç¼³»ê¾÷¿¬±¸¿ø;Çѱ¹°Ç¼³»ê¾÷¿¬±¸¿ø;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº °Ç¼³ÇöÀåÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ȯ°æ¿À¿°¹æÁö½Ã¼³ÀÇ ¼³Ä¡ ¹× ȯ°æº¸ÀüºñÀÇ ¿î¿ë ½ÇŸ¦ ÆÄ¾ÇÇϰí, Á¦µµ °³¼± ¹æ¾ÈÀ» Á¦½ÃÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù. 192°³ °Ç¼³ÇöÀåÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î Á¶»çÇÑ °á°ú, ÃÑ °ø»çºñ ´ëºñ ȯ°æº¸ÀüºñÀÇ °è»ó ºñÀ²Àº 0.59%, ±×¸®°í ½ÇÁ¦ ¼Ò¿ä ºñ¿ëÀº ÃÑ °ø»çºñÀÇ 0.94% ¼öÁØÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. °ø»ç ±Ô¸ð³ª ÇöÀå ÀÔÁö Á¶°Ç µî¿¡ µû¶ó À¯ÀÇÇÒ ¸¸ÇÑ Â÷ÀÌÁ¡Àº ¾ø¾ú´Ù. ȯ°æº¸Àüºñ °è»ó ¹æ½ÄÀ» º¸¸é, Ç¥ÁØÇ°¼À µî¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ¿ø°¡ °è»ê ¹æ½Ä 33.6%, ÃÑ °ø»çºñ ´ëºñ ÀÏÁ¤ ¿äÀ² Àû¿ë 33.7%, ¹Ì°è»ó 14%·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. °Ç¼³ÇöÀå¿¡ ¼³Ä¡µÈ ȯ°æ¿À¿°¹æÁö½Ã¼³À» º¸¸é, ¼ÒÀ½ Áøµ¿¹æÁö½Ã¼³º¸´Ù´Â ¼¼·û±â ¹æÁø¸Á µî°ú °°Àº ´ë±â ¿À¿°¹æÁö½Ã¼³¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÅõÀÚ°¡ ´õ¿í ³ô¾Ò´Ù. ÃÑ °ø»çºñ¿Í ȯ°æº¸ÀüºñÀÇ »ó°ü¼ºÀº r2°ªÀÌ 0.23 ¼öÁØÀ¸·Î ¸Å¿ì ³·°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ ȯ°æº¸Àüºñ °è»ó ¹æ½ÄÀ¸·Î´Â ÀÏÁ¤ ¿äÀ²¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ¹æ½Äº¸´Ù´Â ¿ø°¡ °è»ê ¹æ½ÄÀÌ È®´ëµÉ Çʿ伺ÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù. À̸¦ À§ÇÏ¿©´Â °ø»ç Á¾º°·Î ¼³°è Àû»ê ´Ü°è¿¡¼­ ÇʼöÀûÀ¸·Î °ËÅäÇØ¾ß ÇÒ È¯°æ¿À¿°¹æÁö¼³ºñ¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© ¹ýÀûÀÎ ±âÁØÀ» ¸¶·ÃÇϰí, ½Ã¼³º°·Î Àû»ê ±âÁØÀÇ Á¦Á¤ º¸±ÞÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
The purpose of this study is to find the reality of environmental management cost in construction projects and to suggest some policies in order that owners appropriate the environmental management cost reasonably in the construction budget for reducing the environmental pollution at job sites. We surveyed the actual state of appropriating and expending the environmental management cost over 122 construction sites. According to the results of the survey, while the appropriated rate of the environmental management cost was 0.59% of the total construction cost. the expended rate reached at 0.94%. When examining the antipollution facilities which were operated in job sites, the investment for equipment against air-pollution such as tire washer, dust-proof device was relatively higher than other antipollution equipment. As the method appropriating the environmental management cost, we concluded that a quantity-per-unit costing method is more reasonable than appropriating at a fixed rate of total construction cost considering that there is little correlation between total construction cost and the environmental management cost. To do so, antipollution facilities that must be examined at a design or estimation stage of a construction project should be prescribed by the law. Moreover, referenced cost data for the quantity-per-unit costing should be prepared and officially published.
 
Ű¿öµå
ȯ°æ¿À¿°¹æÁöºñ¿ë;ȯ°æº¸Àüºñ;ȯ°æ¿À¿°¹æÁö½Ã¼³;¿ø°¡°è»ê¹æ½Ä;Environmental management cost;Anti-pollution facilities;Quantity-per-unit costing method;
 
Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.6, no.5, 2005³â, pp.186-192
Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
ISSN : 2005-6095
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200503018302342)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿