|
|
|
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ / v.36, no.4, 1993³â, pp.383-389
|
´ßÀÇÀåÇ®°ú ÀÚÁÖ´Þ°³ºñ¿¡¼ Àû»ö±¤°ú ÀÌ»êÈź¼Ò¿¡ ÀÇÇØ À¯µµµÈ °øº¯¼¼Æ÷ÀÇ ÀüÀ§Â÷ º¯È¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿±À°¼¼Æ÷ÀÇ ¿µÇâ
( Influence of the Mesophyll on the Change of electrical Potential Difference of Guard Cells Induced by Red-light and CO2 in Commelina communis L. and Tradescantia virginiana L. ) |
| ÀÌÁØ»ó; ¾Æ¹öµò´ëÇб³ ½Ä¹°Çаú;
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
| ÃÊ ·Ï |
| Intact leaf°ú detached epidermis¿¡ ÀÖ´Â °øº¯¼¼Æ÷ÀÇ Àü±â »ý¸®ÇÐÀû Ư¼º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ºû°ú ÀÌ»êÈź¼ÒÀÇ È¿°ú¸¦ Á¶»çÇÏ¿´´Ù. ºûÀ» intact leafÀÇ abaxial side¿¡ ó¸®ÇÏ¸é °øº¯¼¼Æ÷¸·ÀÌ °úºÐ±Ø (hyperpolarization)µÇ¾ú´Ù. ´ßÀÇÀåÇ®ÀÇ intact leaf¿¡ ÀÖ´Â °øº¯¼¼Æ÷µéÀº ºû¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ÃÖ´ë 13 mV ±×¸®°í ÀÌ»êÈź¼Ò¿¡ ÀÇÇØ 42 mV±îÁö membrane potential difference(MPD)°¡ negativeÇÏ°Ô º¯Çß´Ù. ÀÚÁÖ´Þ°³ºñ¿¡¼µµ ºñ½ÁÇÑ °á°ú¸¦ ¾ò¾ú´Ù. ±×·¯³ª, ºû°ú ÀÌ»êÈź¼Ò¸¦ detached epidermis¿¡ ÀÖ´Â °øº¯¼¼Æ÷¿¡ ó¸®ÇÒ °æ¿ì¿¡´Â °øº¯¼¼Æ÷ÀÇ MPD°¡ º¯ÇÏÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. À§ÀÇ °á°ú·ÎºÎÅÍ, ¿±À°¼¼Æ÷°¡ °øº¯¼¼Æ÷ÀÇ MPD º¯È¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ÁÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÇ¾î, ¿±À°¼¼Æ÷µéÀ» ±¤ÇÕ¼º ¾ïÁ¦Á¦µéÀ» ħÀ±½ÃÄÑ ¿±À°¼¼Æ÷ ±¤ÇÕ¼ºÀÇ ¾î´À ±âÀÛÀÌ °øº¯¼¼Æ÷ MPD º¯È¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ÁÖ´ÂÁö Á¶»çÇÏ¿´´Ù. CCCP·Î ħÀ±ÇÑ ÀÙÀÇ °øº¯¼¼Æ÷¸·Àº Àû»ö±¤¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ¾à°£ Å»ºÐ±Ø(depolarization)µÇ¾ú°í, ÀÌ»êÈź¼Ò¿¡ ÀÇÇØ °úºÐ±ØµÇ¾ú´Ù. ¹Ý¸é¿¡, DCCD¿Í DCMU·Î ħÀ±ÇÑ °æ¿ì¿¡´Â ´ëÁ¶±¸ ÀÙ°ú ¸¶ÂùÀÚ±â·Î Àû»ö±¤°ú ÀÌ»êÈź¼Ò¿¡ ÀÇÇØ °úºÐ±ØµÇ¾ú´Ù. Azide·Î ħÀ±ÇÑ ÀÙ¿¡ Àû»ö±¤À» ó¸®ÇÏ¸é °øº¯¼¼Æ÷ÀÇMPD´Â º¯ÇÏÁö ¾Ê¾Ò°í, ÀÌ»êÈź¼Ò¸¦ ó¸®ÇÏ¸é ´Ù¸¥ 󸮱¸µé¿¡ ºñÇØ ÈξÀ °¨¼ÒÇÑ ¸·ÀÇ °úºÐ±ØÀ» º¸¿´´Ù. ÀÌ´Â azide°¡ ÀÙ¿¡ ¼Õ»óÀ» À¯µµÇÏ¸ç ¼¼Æ÷³» ´ë»çȰ¼ºÀ» °¨¼Ò½ÃŲ °á°ú ÀÌ»êÈź¼Ò¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ MPD º¯È°¡ ÀÛ¾Ò°í, Àû»ö±¤Àº ¾Æ¹« È¿°úµµ º¸ÀÌÁö ¾ÊÀº °ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÈ´Ù. µû¶ó¼, ¿±À°¼¼Æ÷°¡ Àû»ö±¤À» °¨ÁöÇÏ¸ç ºû¿¡ ÀÇÇØ À¯µµµÈ °øº¯¼¼Æ÷¸· °úºÐ±ØÀº ¼øÈ¯Àû ±¤ÀλêÈ ¹ÝÀÀ¿¡ ÀÇÇØ »ý¼ºµÈ ¿¡³ÊÁö¿¡ ÀÇÁ¸Çϳª ÀÌ»êÈŸ¼Ò¿¡ ÀÇÇØ À¯µµµÈ °øº¯¼¼Æ÷¸· °úºÐ±ØÀº ±¤ÇÕ¼º°¡ ¹«°üÇÏ´Ù°í º¼ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ÀÌ»êÈź¼Ò¸¦ intact leaf¿¡ ó¸®ÇÏ¸é °øº¯¼¼Æ÷ ¾×Æ÷°¡ ¾ËÄ®¸®ÈµÇ´Â °ÍÀ» °üÂûÇÏ¿´´Âµ¥, ÀÌ´Â ¸·ÀÇ °úºÐ±ØÀÌ ¾ç¼ºÀÚ ÀÌ¿ÂÀÇ ¹æÃâ¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ÀϾٴ °ÍÀ» ÀǹÌÇÑ´Ù. |
|
| The effects of light and $CO_2$ on the electrophysiological characteristics of guard cells in the intact leaf and in the detached epidermis have been investigated. Guard cells in intact leaves showed the membrane hyperpolarization in response to light. The biggest induced change of the membrane potential difference (PD) in the guard cells of the intact leaf was 13 m V by light and 42 mV by $CO_2$ in Commelina communis. Similar results were obtained with Tradescantia virginiana. However, there were no changes of membrane PD in detached epidermis. In order to determine the influence of the mesophyll on the changes of membrane PD, infiltration of the mesophyll cells with photosynthetic inhibitors was performed. In CCCP infiltrated leaf discs the guard cell membrane was depolarized slightly by red-light and hyperpolarized by $CO_2$, but in leaf discs infiltrated with DCCD and DCMU the guard cell membrane was hyperpolrized by both red-light and $CO_2$ as the control leaf discs. In azide infiltrated leaf discs the guard cell membrane showed no response to light and there was a much reduced membrane hyperpolarization by $CO_2$ compared to other responses. It was likely that azide caused leaf damage and the activity of cell metabolism was decreased greatly, resulting in small membrane PD changes by $CO_2$ and no changes by redlight. Therefore, it can be suggested that red light was sensed by the mesophyll and the light induced guard cell membrane hyperpolarization was related to energy produced by cyclic-photophosphorylation, but ${CO_2}-induced$ guard cell membrane hyperpolarization was not related to photosynthesis. Alkalisation of the vacuole was observed when the intact leaf was exposed to $CO_2$, indicating that membrane hyperpolarization was mainly the result of proton efflux.efflux. |
| |
| Ű¿öµå |
|
| |
|
|
 |
|
Journal of Plant Biology / v.36, no.4, 1993³â, pp.383-389
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-9239
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO199311920116783)
¾ð¾î : ¿µ¾î |
|
| ³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|
|