¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ / v.45, no.2, 2002³â, pp.102-106

( Effects of Light Availability on Attached Rhinanthus minor (L.), an Angiospermatic Root Hemiparasite )
;; ;;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
We studied the effect of light availability on the growth of an angiospermatic root hemiparasite, Rhinanthus minor. When attached to its host, height growth increased in response to shading, demonstrating that R. minor was able to detect alterations in light quality and/or quantity. However, this reduced illumination did not affect its biomass, number of haustoria, or the amount of $^{15}$ N transferred from the hosts, compared with its performance under non-shaded conditions. Therefore, R. minor is unlikely to have difficulty in extracting host resources under shading. This result may have been mediated by a lowered R. minor transpiration rate in response to fluctuations in external conditions, including shading and water stress, compared with non-parasitic plants. Therefore, we suggest that, as long as the extent of resources diverted from host to parasite is not significantly altered by shading, growth of the attached R. minor will be unaffected by reduced light availability per se.
 
Ű¿öµå
angiospermatic root hemiparasite;haustoria;light availability;Rhinanthus minor;
 
Journal of Plant Biology / v.45, no.2, 2002³â, pp.102-106
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-9239
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200211922411579)
¾ð¾î : ¿µ¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿