¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ / v.7, no.5, 2006³â, pp.53-63
BTL »ç¾÷ÁÖüº° ¹®Á¦ºÐ¼®°ú ÇØ°á¹æ¾È¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸
( A Study For An Improved BTL Project Delivery Method )
±èâ´ö;¹ÚÇý½Å;À̹ÎÀç;À¯Á¤È£; ±¤¿î´ëÇб³ °ÇÃà°øÇаú;±¤¿î´ëÇб³ °ÇÃà°øÇаú;±¤¿î´ëÇб³ °ÇÃà°øÇаú;±¤¿î´ëÇб³ °ÇÃà°øÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
2005³âºÎÅÍ ÀåºÎ´Â ±¹¹Î°æÁ¦ ¼±¼øÈ¯°ú ±¹¹Î »îÀÇ Áú Çâ»óÀ̶ó´Â ¸ñÇ¥ ÇÏ¿¡, ³ôÀº ¼öÁØÀÇ °ø°ø¼­ºñ½º¸¦ Á¶±â ¶Ç´Â Àû±â¿¡ Á¦°øÇϱâ À§ÇÑ ¹æÃ¥ÀÇ ÀÏȯÀ¸·Î BTL »ç¾÷ÀÇ ½ÃÇàÀ» ÃßÁøÇϰí ÀÖ´Ù. ±×·¯³ª ½ÃÇà ÃʱâºÎÅÍ ³·Àº »ç¾÷¼öÀÍ·ü, »ç¾÷Á¦¾È ºñ¿ëÀÇ ºÎ´ã, Á¦µµÀû ±¸Á¶Àû »ç¾÷ ÁøÀÔ À庮À¸·Î ÀÎÇÑ Áö¹æ Áß¼Ò±Ô¸ð °Ç¼³¾÷üÀÇ ºÒ¸¸ µî ¸¹Àº ¹®Á¦Á¡À» ³ªÅ¸³»°í ÀÖ¾î ¼º°øÀûÀÎ BTL »ç¾÷¿¡ °É¸²µ¹ÀÌ µÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ÀÌ¿¡ Á¤ºÎ´Â Áö¹æ Áß¼Ò¾÷üÀÇ Âü¿©À²À» ½Ã°ø ºñÀ² ±ÔÁ¤À¸·Î Á¤ÇÏ°í »ç¾÷¼ºÀÌ ¶³¾îÁö´Â ÀûÁ¤ ÀÌÇÏ ±Ô¸ð °ø»ç¸¦ BTL»ç¾÷¿¡¼­ Á¦¿ÜÇÏ´Â µîÀÇ ´ëÃ¥À» ¼¼¿üÀ¸³ª ±Ùº»ÀûÀÌ ÇØ°áÃ¥À¸·Î¼­´Â ¹ÌÈíÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î Á¶»çµÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â BTL »ç¾÷ ÃßÁø Áß °³¼±µÇ¾î¾ß ÇÒ »çÇ׵鿡 ´ëÇØ¼­ ¹®ÇåÁ¶»ç ¹× Àü¹®°¡¿ÍÀÇ ½ÉÃþ ¸é´ãÁ¶»ç µîÀ» ÅëÇØ Á¶»ç ¹× ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸ °á°ú °¡Àå ±Ùº»ÀûÀÎ °³¼±»çÇ×À¸·Î BTL »ç¾÷ ¼öÇà ÁÖüÀÇ ±¸¼º ¹æ½ÄÀÌ ½Ã°øÀÚ Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î µÇ¾îÀÖ´Â DBFO(Design, Build, Finance, and Operate) ¹æ½Ä¿¡ ÀÖÀ½À» È®ÀÎÇϰí, ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ »ç¾÷ ¼öÇà ÁÖüÀÇ ±¸¼º ¹æ½ÄÀ» À繫Àû ÅõÀÚÀÚ°¡ °Ç¼³»ç¾÷ °ü¸®ÀÚÀÇ Àü¹®Áö½ÄÀ» ÃÖ´ëÇÑ È°¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖµµ·Ï ÇÏ´Â FCDO(Finance, Construction Management, Development and Operate) ¹æ½ÄÀ¸·ÎÀÇ ÀüȯÀ» °³¼±¹æ¾ÈÀ¸·Î Á¦½ÃÇÑ´Ù.
Since 2005, the government began to introduce and promote a new project delivery system, BTL(Build, Transfer, and Lease), in order to provide high level of public services for the upgraded quality of life and to boost the domestic and local construction economy. However, the lack of experiences in the new system by the constituents from diverse economic sectors brought a number of drawbacks from each constituent's perspective such as improperly low earning rate, excessive expenses for preparation of the project proposal, imbalanced regulations, heavy cost and procedures to establish SPC, the ineffective structure of the consortium, the short-term oriented evaluation criteria for the selection and so forth. These drawbacks turned out to be obstacles for the successful BTL projects. Hence, this paper analyzes the above issues and conducts the interviews with the professionals from the diverse sectors in order to propose the changes to resolve those for the improvement and finally to deliver the successful BTL projects for the diverse public owners.
 
Ű¿öµå
»çȸ°£Á¢ÀÚº»;¹Î°£ÅõÀÚ»ç¾÷;SOC;BT;DBFO;FCDO;
 
Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.7, no.5, 2006³â, pp.53-63
Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
ISSN : 2005-6095
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200634515085836)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿