¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ / v.53, no.5, 2010³â, pp.338-343

( Evaluating the Persistence of DNA from Decomposing Transgenic Watermelon Tissues in the Field )
;;;;;; ;;;;;;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
To analyze the persistence of the 35S promoter, nos terminator, and hpt, we buried the leaves and rootstocks of transgenic watermelons (Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai) in 10 cm of soil. Qualitative and quantitative PCR analyses showed that the amount of transgenes in leaf samples was greatly decreased, by 70%, after 1 month, and only 2.5% remained after 2 months. No transgenes were detected in the leaves after 3 months. For buried rootstock samples, transgenes also degraded quickly, but a very small amount was still detectable up to 3 months later. In our investigation of possible gene transfer from decomposing transgenic watermelon to soil bacteria, only the 35S promoter was detected. However, further examination using colony dot hybridization tests indicated that such a transfer did not occur.
 
Ű¿öµå
Citrullus lanatus;DNA persistence;Soil;Transgenic crop;Watermelon;
 
Journal of Plant Biology / v.53, no.5, 2010³â, pp.338-343
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-9239
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201020733094548)
¾ð¾î : ¿µ¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿