¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ / v.7, no.6, 2006³â, pp.141-150
±³À°½Ã¼³ BTL »ç¾÷ÀÇ ÅõÀÚ°¡Ä¡ Æò°¡¸¦ À§ÇÑ ¿î¿µºñ ¸ðÇü ±¸Ãà
( Operating model for A Value-For-Money evaluation of BTL Projects for Educational Facilities )
¼Õ±â¿µ;±èÀ念;±¹µ¿ÈÆ;±è¼±±¹; °æÈñ´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø °ÇÃà°øÇаú;°æ±âµµ ±³À°Ã»;°æÈñ´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø °ÇÃà°øÇаú;°æÈñ´ëÇб³ Åä¸ñ°ÇÃà´ëÇÐ;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
Á¤ºÎ´Â 2005³â 1¿ù '»çȸ±â¹Ý½Ã¼³¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¹Î°£ÅõÀÚ¹ý'ÀÌ °³Á¤µÇ¸é¼­ Àû±ØÀûÀ¸·Î ±³À°½Ã¼³ BTL»ç¾÷À» ÃßÁøÇϰí ÀÖÀ¸³ª ¸¹Àº ½ÃÇàÂø¿À¿Í ¹®Á¦Á¡µéµµ ¹ß»ýµÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ƯÈ÷, ÁÖ¹«°üûÀÌ BTL »ç¾÷ÀÇ Àû°Ý¼º ¿©ºÎ¸¦ ÆÇ´ÜÇϱâ À§ÇØ ½Ç½ÃÇÏ´Â ÅõÀÚ°¡Ä¡ Æò°¡¿¡¼­ »êÁ¤µÈ ºñ¿ëÀÌ ½ÇÁ¦ Çù¾àµÈ Çù¾à¾ÈÀÇ ºñ¿ë°ú Çö°ÝÇÑ Â÷À̰¡ ³ª°í ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î Á¶»çµÇ¾ú´Ù. µû¶ó¼­, º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â È¿À²ÀûÀÎ ±³À°½Ã¼³ BTL »ç¾÷ÀÇ ÃßÁøÀ» À§ÇØ ÇöÇà ÅõÀÚ°¡Ä¡ Æò°¡ÀÇ ¹®Á¦Á¡À» ÆÄ¾ÇÇϰí À̸¦ °³¼±Çϱâ À§ÇØ ½ÇÁ¦Çù¾à¾È°úÀÇ »ó´ëºñ±³¸¦ ÅëÇØ ÅõÀÚ°¡Ä¡ Æò°¡Ç׸ñ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¸íÈ®ÇÑ ±âÁØÀ» Á¦½ÃÇÏ¿© Çù»óÁö¿¬ÀÌ ¹ß»ýÇÏÁö ¾Êµµ·Ï ÅõÀÚ°¡Ä¡ »êÁ¤¿¡ Á¤È®¼ºÀ» Á¦½ÃÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¸ðÇüÀ» ±¸ÃàÇÏ¿´´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­ ±¸ÃàÇÑ ÅõÀÚ°¡Ä¡ Æò°¡¸¦ À§ÇÑ ¿î¿µºñ ¸ðÇüÀ» ±³À°½Ã¼³ BTL »ç¾÷ÀÇ Àû°Ý¼º Æò°¡ ´Ü°¡¿¡¼­ Ȱ¿ëÇÏ¸é »ç¾÷ÀÚ ¼±Á¤ ¹× Çù»ó »Ó ¾Æ´Ï¶ó, ±³À°½Ã¼³ À¯Áö°ü¸®¿Í »ç¿ë ÈÄ Æò°¡(POE)¿¡¼­µµ °´°üÀûÀ̰í ÇÕ¸®Àû ÀÎ °á°ú¸¦ µµÃâÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î ±â´ëµÈ´Ù.
As the law on the private sector investment in social infrastructure was amended in January of 2005, the government is aggressively promoting BTL projects but many trials and errors and problems are occurring. Especially, the Value-For-Money evaluation conducted by the responsible agencies to judge the appropriateness of the project found there was a conspicuous difference between the computed cost and the final contract sum. Accordingly, this study is aimed to grasp the problems in the current Value-For-Money evaluation and to improve it in order to proceed with BTL projects efficiently. To achieve this, through a relative comparison to the final contract sum, a clear standard for the items of Value-For-Money evaluation was presented and thus, a model that can ensure accuracy in computing the Value-For-Money was established so that a delay in negotiations can be avoided. If the Value-For-Money evaluation established in this study is used in assessing the appropriateness of unit prices for BTL projects for education facilities, a reasonable result can be expected to be drawn in selection and negotiations with contractors, and maintenance and Post-Operation-Evaluation(POE) of education facilities as well.
 
Ű¿öµå
Àû°Ý¼º ºÐ¼®;½Ã½ºÅÛ ´ÙÀ̳»¹Í½º;BTL;Analysis of appropriateness;LCC;System Dynamics;
 
Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.7, no.6, 2006³â, pp.141-150
Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
ISSN : 2005-6095
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200634515090207)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿