¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ / v.17, no., 1998³â, pp.60-60
ÄÄÇ»ÅÍ ±×·¢ÇÈÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ Ä¿ÇǼó ³ì½ÃÀ²¿¡ °üÇÑ ½Ã¹Ä·¹ÀÌ¼Ç ½ÇÇ迬±¸
( An Experimental Study on the Greenery Ratio of coffee Shop based the Computer Graphics )
¾È¿ÁÈñ; ¿µ³²´ëÇб³ »ýȰ°úÇдëÇÐ °¡Á¤°ü¸®Çаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
The results of simulation on greenery ratio using CG are as follows: arrangement type of optimal condition and greenery ratio were summarized as below as dispersion type and 5% ratio greenery for 20 pairs of assessment items and these assessment items were classified into 5 factors as a result of factor analysis,. These factors were Harmony Animation Atmosphere texture Peculiarity. Verification results of factors differences according to each condition can be. there was no apparent difference among factors in accordance with gender, In case of arrangement type dispersion type was higher than concentration type in all factors. Based on the above results dispersion type was assessed higher than concentration type the most suitable condition of Harmony Factor was 5% dispersion type Animation Factor was 5% dispersion type Animation Factor was 7% dispersion type Atmosphere Factor was 10% dispersion type Texture Factor was 5% concentration type and ¡¸Peculiarity Factor¡¹was 7% concentration type.
 
Ű¿öµå
Ä¿ÇǼó;³ì½ÃÀ²;
 
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.17, no., 1998³â, pp.60-60
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-7992
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO199810102416841)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿