¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ / v.8, no.1, 2007³â, pp.66-77
È­·Â¹ßÀü¼Ò ¹ßÁÖ¹æ½Ä ºñ±³¸¦ ÅëÇÑ ÀûÁ¤ ¹ßÁÖ¹æ½Ä ¼±Á¤ ¸ðÇü
( A Selection Model For Power Plant Project Delivery Method )
±è¼±±¹;¹ÚÁ¾±Ô;¹ÚÂù½Ä;¼Õ±â¿µ; °æÈñ´ëÇб³ Åä¸ñ°ÇÃà´ëÇÐ »êÇÐÇù·Â±â¼ú¿¬±¸¿ø;Áß¾Ó´ëÇб³ °Ç¼³´ëÇпø;Áß¾Ó´ëÇб³ °ÇÃà°øÇаú;°æÈñ´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø °ÇÃà°øÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
2001³â 4¿ù Á¤ºÎÀÇ Àü·Â»ê¾÷ ±¸Á¶°³ÆíÀ¸·Î Çѱ¹Àü·Â°ø»ç´Â Çѱ¹¼ö·Â ¿øÀڷ°ú 5°³ È­·Â¹ßÀü»ç·Î ºÐÇҵǾú´Ù. ÀÌÈÄ °ø±â¾÷ ¹Î¿µÈ­¸¦ À§ÇÑ °¢ ¹ßÀüȸ»çµé °£ÀÇ °æÀïüÁ¦¿¡ µû¶ó Àû±ØÀûÀÎ ¼öÀÍâÃâÀ» À§ÇÏ¿© ´Ù¾çÇÑ ¹ßÁÖ¹æ½Ä µµÀÔ, Àû¿ëÇϰí ÀÖ´Ù. ÇÏÁö¸¸, È­·Â¹ßÀü¼Ò °Ç¼³»ç¾÷Àº ¹ßÁÖÀÚÀÇ »ç¾÷¸ñÇ¥³ª ÇÁ·ÎÁ§Æ®ÀÇ Æ¯¼ºÀ» Á¦´ë·Î ¹Ý¿µÇÏÁö ¸øÇÑ Ã¤ ¹ßÁÖ¹æ½ÄÀ» ¼±Á¤ÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ÇÁ·ÎÁ§Æ® Âü¿©ÀÚµéÀ» ¸¸Á·½ÃŰÁö ¸øÇϰí ÀÖ´Â ½ÇÁ¤ÀÌ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸´Â È­·Â¹ßÀü¼Ò °Ç¼³»ç¾÷¿¡¼­ÀÇ ¹ßÁÖ¹æ½ÄÀ» ¼±Á¤Çϱâ À§Çؼ­ °í·ÁÇØ¾ß ÇÒ ¿µÇâ¿äÀεéÀ» Á¶»çÇÏ°í ¼³¹® ¹× ¸é´ãÁ¶»ç¸¦ ÅëÇÏ¿© ÀûÁ¤ÇÑ ¹ßÁÖ¹æ½ÄÀÇ ¼±Á¤±âÁØÀ» °³¹ßÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ¹ßÁÖÀÚÀÇ »ç¾÷¸ñÇ¥¿¡ ¸Â´Â ¹ßÁÖ¹æ½ÄÀ» ¼±Á¤ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¸ðÇüÀ» ±¸ÃàÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ» ¸ñÀûÀ¸·Î ÇÑ´Ù. ÇâÈÄ º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­ Á¦¾ÈÇÑ ¹ßÁÖ¹æ½Ä ¼±Á¤¸ðÇüÀ» Ȱ¿ëÇϸé ÁÖ°üÀûÀÌ°í °æÇèÀûÀÎ ÆÇ´Ü¿¡ ÀÇÁ¸ÇÏ¿© ¹ßÁÖ¹æ½ÄÀ» °áÁ¤Çß´ø ±âÁ¸ÀÇ °üÇàÀ» ¹þ¾î³ª ¹ßÁÖÀÚÀÇ »ç¾÷¸ñÇ¥, ¹ßÁÖÀÚÀÇ Æ¯¼º ¹× ¿ä±¸Á¶°Ç, °Ç¼³»ç¾÷ÀÇ Æ¯¼º µîÀ» È¿°úÀûÀ¸·Î ¹Ý¿µÇÏ¿© È­·Â¹ßÀü¼Ò °Ç¼³»ç¾÷ÀÇ ÀûÁ¤ÇÑ ¹ßÁÖ¹æ½ÄÀ» ¼±Á¤ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î ±â´ëµÈ´Ù.
With the electricity industry structure reformation of the government in April, 2001, Korea Power Electric Corporation was divided in to Korea water power nuclear power and 5 thermal power plant. After, various delivery method is introduced and applied for active profit creation according to the competition between each development companies for the public company privatization. However, the current situation does not satisfy the project participant by selecting the delivery method without reflecting the business goal and project characteristics of power plant construction business. The objective of this study is to research the influencing factors that should be considered to select the delivery method in thermal power construction business and develop a standard of selection of appropriate delivery method through questionnaire and interviews to establish a model to select the delivery method that fits the business goal of the subject of delivery. In the future, if the delivery method selection model suggested in this study is applied, it is expected to select the appropriate delivery method of power plant construction business by effectively reflecting the business goal, characteristics and demand of the delivery subject, and characteristics of the construction business apart from the existing customary practices that decided the delivery method dependent on the subjective and experience based judgement.
 
Ű¿öµå
È­·Â¹ßÀü¼Ò;¹ßÁÖ¹æ½Ä;½Ã½ºÅÛ ´ÙÀ̳»¹Í½º;power plant;delivery method;system dynamic;
 
Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.8, no.1, 2007³â, pp.66-77
Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
ISSN : 2005-6095
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200710912655471)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿