|
|
|
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ / v.2, no., 1994³â, pp.40-40
|
±Ù´ë µðÀÚÀÎÀÇ Àüȯ±âÀû ½ÃÁ¡¿¡ ÀÖ¾î¼ Àå½Ä·ÐÀÇ Àü°³°úÁ¤¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸
( A Study on the Development of Ornamental Theory Design in Transitional Age ) |
| Á¶¿µ¹è;±èÈ«±â;À±µµ±Ù; È«ÀÍ´ë °ÇÃàÇаú;µ¿¾ç°øÀü °ÇÃà°ú;È«ÀÍ´ë °ÇÃàÇаú;
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
| ÃÊ ·Ï |
|
|
| This thesis is to research the change in attitude regarding the architectura ornament. One of the key dogmas within Modern Movement of art and design was anti-ornamentalism. The modernist had revolted against ornament and believed that the greatness of the modern age might lay in its inability to produce a new form of ornament. Architectural ornament has been passed through an process of evolution in a decadent stage. In this context, the purpose of this study is to identify historical meaning of architectural ornament in the age of transition toward Modernism. |
| |
| Ű¿öµå |
|
| |
|
|
 |
|
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.2, no., 1994³â, pp.40-40
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-7992
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO199410102466725)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î |
|
| ³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|
|