¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ / v.5, no.2, 2004³â, pp.55-63
Life-cycle Management¸¦ Ȱ¿ëÇÑ °ø°ø½Ã¼³ À¯Áö°ü¸® ½Ã½ºÅÛ °³¼±¹æ¾È
( A Study on the Improvement of Public Facility Management System Using Life-cycle Management )
ÀüÀͼº;¼ÕÁ¤¶ô;±è°æ¼÷;±èÀçÁØ; ÇѾç´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø °ÇÃà°øÇаú;ÇѾç´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø °ÇÃà°øÇаú;µ¿¿ø´ëÇÐ ½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇаú;ÇѾç´ëÇб³ °ÇÃà°øÇкÎ;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
À¯Áö°ü¸® ºÐ¾ß´Â ´Ù¸¥ ´Ü°è¿¡ ºñÇØ¼­ ¹ý°ú Á¦µµ°¡ ¹ÌºñÇϰí, °ü°è±â°ü ¹× °ÇÃàÁÖ°¡ ÀÌ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ´ëºñ°¡ ÃæºÐÇÏÁö ¸øÇÏ¿© °ÇÃ๰ÀÇ ¼ö¸íÀÌ ¹°¸®ÀûÀÎ ¼ö¸í¿¡ ÈξÀ ¹ÌÄ¡Áö ¸øÇÏ´Â °æ¿ì°¡ ¸¹ÀÌ ¹ß»ýÇϰí ÀÖ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ °Ç¼³Á¦´Ü°èÀÇ Life-cycleÀ» °í·ÁÇϸé Àüü °ø¿ë¼ö¸í Áß À¯Áö°ü¸®´Ü°è°¡ ÀüüÀÇ $70%$°¡·®À» Á¡À¯Çϰí À־ °Ç¼³»ê¾÷ÀÇ ÇÕ¸®È­¸¦ À§¿¡¼­ À¯Áö°ü¸®¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °ü¸®Ã¼°èÀÇ Á¤¸³ÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÏ´Ù. ±×¸®°í ÇöÀç ¿î¿ë ÁßÀÎ À¯Áö°ü¸® ½Ã½ºÅÛÀº ÁÖ·Î ÇÏÀڹ߻ý½Ã À̸¦ ó¸®ÇÏ´Â ÇÏÀÚ´ëÀÀ½Ã½ºÅÛÀ¸·Î ¿î¿µµÇ°í ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ´Ù¸¥ ´Ü°è¿ÍÀÇ Á¤º¸ °øÀ¯´Â ³·Àº ¼öÁØ¿¡¼­ ÀÌ·ç¾îÁö°í ÀÖ´Ù. °øµ¿ÁÖÅÃÀ» ºñ·ÔÇÑ °ÇÃ๰°ú °ü·ÃµÈ ¿ì¸®³ª¶óÀÇ ±âÁ¸ Á¦µµ, ¹ý±Ô ¹× Á¤Ã¥ µîÀº ½Å±Ô °Ç¼³½ÃÀå¿¡ ÃÊÁ¡ÀÌ ¸ÂÃß¾îÁ® À־, ±âÁ¸ ½Ã¼³¹°À» È¿À²ÀûÀ¸·Î °ü¸®Çϱâ À§ÇÑ Ã¼°è´Â ¾ÆÁ÷ Á¦´ë·Î Á¤ºñµÇ¾î ÀÖÁö ¾Ê°í ÀÖ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â °ø°ø½Ã¼³¹°ÀÇ È¿À²ÀûÀÎ $¿î¿µcdot°ü¸®cdotȰ¿ë$À» À§ÇÏ¿© °ø°ø½Ã¼³¹° À¯Áö°ü¸® ü°èÀÇ ÇöȲÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿© ½Ã½ºÅÛÀÇ ±¸Ãà¹æÇâÀ» Á¦½ÃÇϸç, ³ª¾Æ°¡ Á¤ºÎÁÖµµ·Î ±¸ÃàµÇ°í ÀÖ´Â °Ç¼³Á¤º¸ ½Ã½ºÅÛÀ» ±¸Ãà¿¡ ´ëÀÀÇÏ¿©, ÇöÇà À¯Áö°ü¸® Á¤º¸½Ã½ºÅÛÀÇ ¹ßÀü¹æÇâ°ú °³¼±¹æÇâÀ» Á¦½ÃÇϰíÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù.
A building structures was used the facility management phase through $planingcdotdesigncdotconstruction$. phase. building's length of life was shorter than its physical length of life, because of the lack of law and institution, the lack of related agencies' preparation and owner's preparation. Also, considering the construction life-cycle, the facility phase accounted for $70%$ of whole official lift, therefore, it needed to be opposed to systemic facility management. Current facility management system practically managed the defect of facility and almost never communicated between the other phase. In the side of policy, domestic law, institution, and policy related to building structure focused built-up market. and then the management of existing facilities was not consolidated efficiently. The purpose of this study was to suggest the direction of facility management construction for managing, utilizing, and operating public facilities, moreover, to study the direction of current facility management system improvement corresponding to total computer integrated construction system under government agencies.
 
Ű¿öµå
ÅëÇհǼ³Á¤º¸½Ã½ºÅÛ;°ø°ø½Ã¼³ À¯Áö°ü¸®½Ã½ºÅÛ;CIC(Computer Integrated Construction) system;Life-cycle Management;Public Facility Management;
 
Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.5, no.2, 2004³â, pp.55-63
Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
ISSN : 2005-6095
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200420828318455)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿