¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ / v.12, no.2, 2011³â, pp.3-11
¹°°¡º¯µ¿Á¦µµ ¿î¿µ¹æ½Ä °³¼±¹æ¾È
( Improvement on the Managerial Method of Price Fluctuation System )
ÀÌÀç¼·;½Å¿µÃ¶; µ¿±¹´ëÇб³(¼­¿ï) ´ëÇпø °ÇÃà°øÇаú;µ¿±¹´ëÇб³(¼­¿ï) °ÇÃà°øÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
°ø°ø°Ç¼³°ø»çÀÇ °è¾à±Ý¾×Á¶Á¤»çÀ¯·Î¼­ ¹°°¡º¯µ¿Á¦µµ´Â 1969³â ½Ã¼³°ø»ç°è¾àÀϹÝÁ¶°ÇÀ¸·Î óÀ½ µµÀԵǾú´Ù. Á¶Á¤¿ä°ÇÀº °è¾àÀϷκÎÅÍ 90ÀÏ °æ°ú ¹× ÀÔÂûÀϷκÎÅÍ µî¶ô·ü 3%ÀÌ»óÀ» µ¿½Ã¿¡ ÃæÁ·ÇÏ¿©¾ß Çϴµ¥ ÀÌ ¶§ Àû¿ëÇÏ´Â µî¶ô·ü »êÁ¤¹æ½ÄÀº ǰ¸ñÁ¶Á¤°ú Áö¼öÁ¶Á¤ÀÇ ´Ü µÎ °¡Áö»ÓÀÌ´Ù. 4°³ °ø°ø±â°üÀÇ 163°³ »ç¾÷ÀåÀ» Á¶»çÇÑ °á°ú ¸ðµÎ Áö¼öÁ¶Á¤¹æ½ÄÀ» Àû¿ëÇϰí ÀÖ¾ú°í, Á¶Á¤±âÁØÀϺÎÅÍ °è¾à±Ý¾×Á¶Á¤ ½ÂÀÎÀϱîÁö 6°³¿ùÀ» ÃʰúÇÏ´Â »ç¾÷ÀåÀÌ ÀüüÀÇ 90%¸¦ »óȸÇÏ¿´´Ù. °è¾à±Ý¾×Á¶Á¤±îÁöÀÇ Àå±â°£ ¼Ò¿ä´Â º¹ÀâÇÑ µî¶ô·ü »êÁ¤¹æ½ÄÀÌ ÁÖ¿øÀÎÀ̹ǷΠÀ̸¦ ´Ù¾çÈ­ÇÏ¿© ½Ã°øÀÚÀÇ ¼±ÅñÇÀ» È®º¸ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÏ´Ù. ÇöÇà ¹ßÇ¥µÇ´Â Çѱ¹ÀºÇàÀÇ »ý»êÀÚ/¼ÒºñÀÚ¹°°¡Áö¼öÀÇ Æò±ÕÁö¼ö, °Ç¼³°ø»çºñÁö¼ö¿¡ ´ëÇÑ º¸Á¤°è¼ö¸¦ Àû¿ëÇÏ´Â ¹æ½ÄÀ» Ãß°¡ÇÑ´Ù¸é º°µµÀÇ Ãß°¡ºñ¿ë ¾øÀ̵µ ´Ù¾çÈ­¸¦ ¸¸Á·½ÃÄÑ Á¶Á¤½ÅûÁö¿¬À» ÃÖ¼ÒÈ­ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â ¹°°¡º¯µ¿À¸·Î ÀÎÇÑ °è¾à±Ý¾×Á¶Á¤À» ½Å¼ÓÇϰí È¿À²ÀûÀ¸·Î ÀÌÇàÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖµµ·Ï ¹°°¡º¯µ¿·ü »êÁ¤¹æ½ÄÀÇ ´Ù¾çÈ­¿Í ½Ã°øÀÚÀÇ ¼±ÅÃ±Ç È®Àå µîÀÇ ¹°°¡º¯µ¿Á¦µµ ¿î¿µ¹æ½Ä °³¼±¹æ¾ÈÀ» Á¦½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù.
There are several causes to recalculate the contract amount in public construction projects. Among them, the escalation clause was introduced in 1969 and now the condition to recalculate the cost is effective after 90 days from the date of contract and the rate of fluctuation should be more than 3% from the date of bidding. The two calculation methods for the rate of fluctuation are item-adjustment and index-adjustment. According to the results of investigation into 4 public institutions and 163 projects, all of them have used the method of index-adjustment and the rate of projects that spend over 6 months obtaining the approval of contract amount adjustment is more than 90%. The reason for spending lots of time is caused by problems of the calculation method on the price fluctuation rate. Therefore, it is necessary that the calculation method should be diversified to cope with the problems and a option of the builder should be expanded as well. Furthermore, if the way to apply correction factors to construction price index and average index based on the producer and consumer price index made by the bank of Korea is added, then the duration will be reduced without additional expenses. This study proposed the diversification of the calculation method using price fluctuation rate and builders' expanded options as improvement on the managerial method of Price Fluctuation System for the prompt and efficient contract amount adjustment.
 
Ű¿öµå
¹°°¡º¯µ¿;Áö¼öÁ¶Á¤¹æ½Ä;°è¾àº¯°æ;°è¾à±Ý¾×Á¶Á¤;escalation;index adjustment;contract change;contract amount;
 
Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.12, no.2, 2011³â, pp.3-11
Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
ISSN : 2005-6095
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201116637925810)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿