¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ / v.12, no.3, 2011³â, pp.121-130
BTO ¹Î°£ÅõÀÚ»ç¾÷ ÇØÁö½ÃÁö±Þ±Ý ¸Å¼öû±¸±Ç °¡Ä¡¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸
( A Study on Early Termination Payment Option of BTO PPI Projects )
½Å¼ºÈ¯; È«ÀÍ´ëÇб³ °æ¿µ´ëÇÐ;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ³í¹®¿¡¼­´Â ¹Î°£ÅõÀÚ»ç¾÷¿¡¼­ »ç¾÷½ÃÇàÀÚ°¡ º¸À¯Çϰí ÀÖ´Â ÇØÁö½ÃÁö±Þ±Ý¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¸Å¼öû±¸±ÇÀÇ °¡Ä¡¸¦ ÀÌÇ׸ðÇüÀ» ÅëÇÑ ½Ç¹°¿É¼Ç °¡Ä¡ÃßÁ¤ ¹æ¹ý·ÐÀ» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© ÃßÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¸Å¼öû±¸±ÇÀº »ç¾÷½ÃÇàÀÚÀÇ ºÎµµÁ¶°ÇºÎ ¸Å¼öû±¸±Ç°ú ºÎµµÁ¶°ÇÀÌ ¾ø´Â ¸Å¼öû±¸±ÇÀ¸·Î ±¸ºÐÇÏ¿© °¡Ä¡¸¦ ÃßÁ¤ÇÏ¿´°í, ÇØÁö½ÃÁö±Þ±ÝÀº »ç¾÷ÀÚ±ÍÃ¥ÀÎ °æ¿ìÀÇ ±Ý¾×À¸·Î °¡Á¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¿î¿µ¼öÀÔ, ¿î¿µºñ¿ë, »ç¾÷¼öÀÍ·ü, ºÎäºñÀ², ¿î¿µ¼öÀÔÀÇ º¯µ¿¼º µî¿¡ µû¶ó ¸Å¼öû±¸±ÇÀÇ °¡Ä¡´Â ´Þ¶óÁö´Âµ¥, ºÎµµÁ¶°ÇÀÌ ¾ø´Â ¸Å¼öû±¸±Ç °¡Ä¡´Â ´ë·« ÃÑ»ç¾÷ºñÀÇ 1%~7% ¼öÁØÀ¸·Î ÃßÁ¤µÇ¾ú°í ºÎµµÁ¶°ÇºÎ ¸Å¼öû±¸±ÇÀÇ °æ¿ì 0%~1.89% ¼öÁØÀ¸·Î ÃßÁ¤µÇ¾ú´Ù. ¹Î°£ÅõÀÚ»ç¾÷ÀÇ ¼ö¿ä¿¹ÃøÀ§ÇèÀÇ ¿µÇâÀ» ÆÄ¾ÇÇϱâ À§ÇØ ½ÇÁ¦ ¿î¿µ¼öÀÔÀÌ ¿¹»ó¼öÀÔ°ú ´Ù¸¥ °æ¿ìÀÇ ¸Å¼öû±¸±Ç °¡Ä¡µµ ÃßÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ½ÇÁ¦ ¿î¿µ¼öÀÔÀÌ ¿¹»ó¼öÀÔ¿¡ ¸ø ¹ÌÄ¡´Â °æ¿ì ¸Å¼öû±¸±Ç °¡Ä¡´Â Å« ÆøÀ¸·Î »ó½ÂÇÏ´Â ¹Ý¸é ¹Ý´ëÀÇ °æ¿ì´Â ¸Å¼öû±¸±Ç °¡Ä¡°¡ ¼ÒÆø Ç϶ôÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ÃßÁ¤µÇ¾ú´Ù. ÀÌ´Â ¼ö¿ä¿¹ÃøÀÇ ºÒÈ®½Ç¼ºÀÌ Å« °æ¿ì ½Ç½ÃÇù¾à ½ÃÁ¡¿¡¼­ÀÇ ¸Å¼öû±¸±Ç °¡Ä¡´Â ¿¹»ó¼öÀÔÀ» °¡Á¤ÇÑ ¸Å¼öû±¸±Ç °¡Ä¡º¸´Ù »ó´çÈ÷ Ŭ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù´Â Á¡À» ÀǹÌÇÑ´Ù. º» ³í¹®Àº ÇâÈÄ ÇØÁö½ÃÁö±Þ±Ý Á¦µµ¸¦ °³¼±Çϴµ¥ ±â¿©ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î ±â´ëµÈ´Ù.
Real option values of early termination payment for selected BTO PPI projects are studied using binomial models. Two cases of early termination payments are considered; an option with the condition of private participants' default, and an option without the condition. Values vary depending upon parameter values such as revenues, costs, discount rates, debt ratio, and volatility of revenues. For selected projects, the option values without the default condition are estimated as 1%~7% of total project costs, whereas the option values with the default condition are estimated as 0%~1.89% of total project cost. When actual revenues differ from the forecasted revenues, apparently the option values deviate from the values based upon the forecasted revenues. When actual revenues fall short of the forecasted revenues, the option values increase by a large amount whereas the option values decrease by a small amount in the opposite case. This implies that the option values can be quite bigger than the values based upon the forecasted revenue especially when the revenue forecast uncertainty is large. This study is expected to play an important role in improving the early termination payment option policy of the government in PPI projects in Korea.
 
Ű¿öµå
½Ç¹°¿É¼Ç;¸Å¼öû±¸±Ç;ÇØÁö½ÃÁö±Þ±Ý;¼ö¿ä¿¹ÃøÀ§Çè;Real Option;Early Termination Payment;PPI projects;Revenue Forecast Uncertainty;
 
Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.12, no.3, 2011³â, pp.121-130
Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
ISSN : 2005-6095
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201119342676413)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿