¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ / v.12, no.3, 2011³â, pp.53-61
±¹³» ¼³°è.°¨¸® µî ¿ë¿ªº¸ÁõÁ¦µµ ÇöȲ ¹× °³¼±¹æ¾È ¿¬±¸
( A Study on the Improvement of Engineering and Construction Supervision Guarantee System in Korea )
ÀÌ¿ëÈñ;ÃÖÀçÈ£; »óÁö¿£Áö´Ï¾î¸µ°ÇÃà»ç»ç¹«¼Ò;µ¿¾Æ´ëÇб³ Åä¸ñ°øÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
Á¤ºÎ´Â 1990³â´ë ´ëÇü°ÇÃ๰ÀÇ ºØ±«»ç°í°¡ ÀÕµû¸£°í °ÇÃ๰ÀÇ »ç°í·Î ÀÎÇÑ ÀÎÀû, ¹°Àû ¼ÕÇØ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ º¸ÀüÃ¥ÀÌ ºÒÃæºÐÇÏ´Ù´Â ÁöÀû¿¡ µû¶ó '±¹°¡°è¾à¹ý'»ó¿¡ ÀÏÁ¤±Ô¸ð ÀÌ»óÀÇ ¿ë¿ªÀ̳ª °Ç¼³°ø»ç¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© Àǹ«º¸Çè¿¡ °¡ÀÔÇϵµ·Ï ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ƯÈ÷ 2002³â¿¡ ¼³°è ¹× °¨¸® µîÀÇ ±â¼ú¿ë¿ª ºÐ¾ß¸¦ À§ÇÑ º¸ÁõÁ¦µµ°¡ µµÀÔµÈ ÈÄ ¿©·¯ ¿î¿µ»óÀÇ ¹®Á¦Á¡ÀÌ Ç¥ÃâµÇ°í ÀÖÀ¸³ª ÀÌ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ±¸Ã¼ÀûÀÎ ÇöȲ ºÐ¼® ¹× °³¼±¹æ¾ÈÀ» ¸¶·ÃÇϱâ À§ÇÑ ¿¬±¸´Â ¸Å¿ì ¹ÌÈíÇÑ »óȲÀÌ´Ù. º» ³í¹®Àº µ¨ÆÄÀÌ ¹æ¹ýÀ» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© ±â¼ú¿ë¿ª º¸ÁõÁ¦µµ¿Í °ü·ÃµÈ ÁÖ¿ä Á¦µµ ¹× ¿î¿µ»óÀÇ ¹®Á¦Á¡À» µµÃâÇϰí ÀÌ¿¡ ´ëÇØ¼­ ÁÖ¿ä º¸Áõ½ÃÀå Âü°¡ÀÚÀÎ ¹ßÁÖû, ¿ë¿ª»ç, º¸Çè»çÀÇ º¸Çè¾÷¹« ½Ç¹«´ã´çÀÚ¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ¼³¹®Á¶»ç¸¦ ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿© °³¼±¹æ¾ÈÀ» µµÃâÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÁÖ¿ä Á¤Ã¥Àû ´ë¾ÈÀ¸·Î´Â ½Å¿ëÆò°¡¿¡ ±Ù°£À» µÐ º¸ÁõÇѵµÀÇ Á¶Á¤, ºñÈ¿À²ÀûÀÎ ¿¬´ëº¸ÁõÀÎ Á¦µµÀÇ ÆóÁö, Á¦3ÀÚ ÀÎÀû¼ÕÇØÀÇ ´ãº¸¹üÀ§ Æ÷ÇÔ°ú º¸Çè°¡ÀԱݾ×ÀÇ »óÇâ, º¸Çè ±â°£ÀÇ ¿¬Àå ¹× ±âŸ Á¦µµÁ¤ºñ»çÇ×À» Á¦½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. Á¦¾ÈµÈ °³¼±¹æ¾Èµé¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÌÇØ´ç»çÀÚ°£¿¡ °ø°¨´ë Çü¼ºÀº ±¹³» °Ç¼³ »ê¾÷°èÀÇ °ÇÀüÇÑ ¹ßÀüÀ¸·Î À̾îÁú °ÍÀ¸·Î ±â´ëÇØº»´Ù.
After several collapse accidents of large structures in the early 1990s in Korea, the government enacted a law that architectural, engineering and construction firms are obliged to have insurance for projects over a certain size. Particularly, with regard to insurance in design and construction supervision works (i.e. engineering insurance), although several operation-based problems were pointed out from practitioners, still little research has been done on analyzing current regnlartory and operational state and suggesting policy alternatives. Hence, this study applies Delphi technique to solicit current operational problems and propose a series of improvements on engineering insurance based on interview surveys targeting major market participants: municipalities, engineering firms, and insurance companies. Key findings culminate in adopting guarantee limits based on credit evaluation, abrogating joint surety, covering a loss of life, increasing insurance entrance fee, extending time covered, and etc. Reaching a consensus on the proposed alternatives between the market participants will form the foundation for sound developments of construction design and engineering industry.
 
Ű¿öµå
¿ë¿ªº¸Áõ;°Ç¼³º¸Áõ;º¸Áõº¸Çè;µ¨ÆÄÀÌ ¹æ¹ý;Surety Bond;Insurance;Guarantee;Policy Alternatives;Delphi Method;
 
Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.12, no.3, 2011³â, pp.53-61
Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
ISSN : 2005-6095
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201119342676399)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿