¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ / v.15, no.1, 2006³â, pp.39-46
Çѱ¹ Çö´ë ½Ç³»µðÀÚÀο¡¼­ Çѱ¹¼º Ç¥Çö¹æ¹ýÀÇ °æÇâ¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸ - 1990³â´ë ÀÌÈÄ ÁÖ¿ä ÀÛ°¡ÀÛǰÀÇ µðÀÚÀÎ ¹æ¹ý ºÐ¼®À» Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î -
( A Study on the tendencies of Expressional Methods of Koreaness In Contemporary Korean Interior Design - Focused on the Analysis of Design Methods of Korean Primary Designers' Works since 1990 - )
À̼÷°æ;ÃÖ»óÇå; Áß¾Ó´ëÇб³ °Ç¼³´ëÇпø ½Ç³»°ÇÃàÇаú;Áß¾Ó´ëÇб³ °Ç¼³´ëÇпø ½Ç³»°ÇÃàÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
There lies more subjectivity in the methods and process of showing the Koreaness, and design methods cannot be defined with only one answer key, which is probable to cause much difficulty. Until now, the traditional Korean features have been tried by quite a few designers whose approaches deserves for the reference to understand the trends of expressing the Koreaness and develop the ways of its expression. Therefore, this study first considers the trial processes of design methods in reconsidering the Koreaness done by many artists in terms of previous studies and researches. Then this tries to make a frame to analyze the Koreaness theoretically after studying the approaches knowledge about traditional architecture designs widely used as design concepts, and to examine specific cases which reflects them in their interior architecture. All of these studies are aimed at get the understandings on trends and methods demonstrating the Koreaness in modern interior design. This study ranges from the artists, who have made efforts to express Koreaness in 1990s and after, to their artworks. As study methods, pre-study and reference researches had been done to examine the knowledge factors on the ground of the theory of D.G Jansson, to give a theory to the understanding of its methods and tendencies, and to build the frame for case analysis. As a result, in traditional architecture, spacial design gets the prominent priority and other factors are not far from different. In formative approachesthe expression inclination on material factor is outstanding. Consequently, these two approaches have analytic elements in difference but spacial design and materiality have prominently in common to express the Koreaness.
 
Ű¿öµå
Çѱ¹¼º;µðÀÚÀÎ ¹æ¹ý;Ç¥Çö¹æ¹ýÀÇ °æÇâ;Koreaness;Design methods;Tendencies of expressional methods;
 
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.15, no.1, 2006³â, pp.39-46
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-7992
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200612842567635)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿