¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ / v.13, no.1, 2012³â, pp.77-86
Áøµµ°ü¸® ÀÚµ¿È­¸¦ À§ÇÑ ÀÚ·á¼öÁý±â¼ú(DAT) ¼±Á¤ ¹æ¹ý
( Data Acquisition Technology (DAT) Selection Algorithm for Automated Progress Measurement and Management )
°­½ÂÈñ;Á¤¿µ¼ö; ´ëÇѰǼ³Á¤Ã¥¿¬±¸¿ø;¸íÁö´ëÇб³ °ÇÃà´ëÇÐ;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
°Ç¼³ ÇÁ·ÎÁ§Æ®ÀÇ ¼º°ú ÃøÁ¤ ¹× °ü¸®¿¡ ÀÖ¾î Áøµµ°ü¸®´Â ±âº»ÀûÀ̸ç ÇÙ½ÉÀûÀÎ ¾÷¹«±â´ÉÀÌ´Ù. ¿À·£ ±â°£ µ¿¾È ´Ù¾çÇÑ Áøµµ °ü¸® ±â¹ýÀÌ ¿¬±¸ °³¹ßµÇ°í ÀÖÀ½¿¡µµ ºÒ±¸Çϰí, ÀÚ·á¼öÁýÀ» À§ÇÑ °úµµÇÑ ¾÷¹«ºÎ´ãÀº ü°èÈ­µÈ Áøµµ°ü¸®ÀÇ Àå¾Ö¿ä¼Ò·Î ÁöÀûµÇ¾î ¿Ô´Ù. ÃÖ±Ù ÀÚ·á¼öÁý±â¼ú(Data Acquisition Technology, DAT)ÀÇ ¹ßÀüÀº ÀÚµ¿È­µÈ Áøµµ°ü¸®ÀÇ ±âȸ¸¦ Á¦°øÇϰí Çϰí ÀÖ´Ù. ±×·³¿¡µµ ºÒ±¸Çϰí Áö±Ý±îÁöÀÇ DAT ¿¬±¸´Â ƯÁ¤ °øÁ¾ ¶Ç´Â ƯÁ¤ ±â¼ú¿¡ ÁýÁßÇϰí ÀÖ¾î, °Ç¼³»ç¾÷ ÀüüÀÇ Áøµµ°ü¸® ÀÚµ¿È­¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸´Â ÀÌ·ç¾îÁöÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ °üÁ¡¿¡¼­, º» ¿¬±¸´Â °Ç¼³»ç¾÷ °øÁ¾º° ÃÖÀûÀÇ DAT¸¦ ¼±Á¤ÇÏ´Â ¹æ¹ý·ÐÀ» Á¦¾ÈÇÏ¿´´Ù. DAT ¼±Á¤¹æ¹ýÀº °¢ °øÁ¾º° ÁøµµÃøÁ¤ÀÇ ¹æ¹ý, ´ë»ó, ¹üÀ§, ±â¼ú µîÀÇ À¯ÇüÀ» ºÐ·ùÇÏ¿©, À̸¦ DAT Ư¼ºº°·Î ÃÖÀûÄ¡¸¦ µµÃâÇÏ´Â ¾Ë°í¸®ÁòÀ¸·Î ±¸¼ºµÈ´Ù. Á¦¾ÈµÈ ¹æ¹ý·ÐÀÇ °ËÁõÀ» À§ÇÏ¿© »ç·Ê ÇÁ·ÎÁ§Æ®¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ±â°èÀû ºÐ¼®À» ½Ç½ÃÇÏ°í ¶ÇÇÑ ½Ç¹«ÀÚ Æò°¡¸¦ ¼öÇàÇÑ °á°ú, ´ëºÎºÐ °øÁ¾¿¡¼­ µ¿ÀÏÇÑ °á°ú¸¦ ¾ò¾ú´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ »ç·ÊÇöÀå Æò°¡°á°ú ÁßÀÇ Çϳª·Î¼­, ³ë¹«ÀÚÀÇ Ãþº° ÃâÀÔÁ¤º¸¸¦ RFID¸¦ Ȱ¿ëÇÏ¿© ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ °¡Àå È¿À²ÀûÀÌ¸ç °¡Àå ¸¹Àº °øÁ¾¿¡ Àû¿ëÀÌ °¡´ÉÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
Progress measurement provides project participants with valuable information in terms of 'current status', 'corrective countermeasure', and 'forecast of future risks'. However, the managerial effort (or workload) required to acquire and maintain detailed progress data has been the major barrier to practical implementation. Even though recent efforts in utilizing data acquisition technologies (DATs) have actively attempted to automate the progress measurement process, previous DAT research has only been focused on limited construction tasks or selected technologies. This paper proposes a DAT selection algorithm that automatically assign an appropriate DAT for every commodity item for an entire constriction project. Five different criteria were identified and developed in order to comprehend specific requirements for automating the progress measurement of each commodity group. A case-study and also a survey from practitioners were conducted in order to validate the proposed methodology.
 
Ű¿öµå
°øÁ¤°ü¸®;Áøµµ°ü¸®;ÀÚµ¿È­;¼¾¼­;Schedule control;Progress Measurement;Automation;Sensing;DAT (Data Acquisition Technology);
 
Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.13, no.1, 2012³â, pp.77-86
Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
ISSN : 2005-6095
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201208040009289)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿