¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ / v.13, no.1, 2012³â, pp.67-76
¹°°¡º¯µ¿ Á¶Á¤¹æ¹ýÀÇ ºñ±³ºÐ¼®À» ÅëÇÑ ÇÕ¸®È­ ¹æ¾È
( The Rationalization through Comparative Analysis of Price Fluctuation Adjustment Method )
±è¼ºÈñ; SH°ø»ç;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
°ø°ø°ø»çÀÇ ¹°°¡º¯µ¿·ü »êÁ¤¹æ½ÄÀº Áö¼öÁ¶Á¤°ú ǰ¸ñÁ¶Á¤ ¹æ½ÄÀÌ ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, °ü·Ã¹ý±Ô¿¡¼­´Â ǰ¸ñÁ¶Á¤¹æ¹ýÀ» ¿øÄ¢À¸·Î »ï°í ÀÖÀ¸³ª ´ë´Ù¼öÀÇ °Ç¼³ÇöÀå¿¡¼­´Â Áö¼öÁ¶Á¤ÀÇ ¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î °è¾à±Ý¾×Á¶Á¤ÀÌ ÀÌ·ç¾îÁö°í ÀÖ´Ù. ÀÌ¿¡ º» ¿¬±¸´Â Áö¼öÁ¶Á¤°ú ǰ¸ñÁ¶Á¤ ¹æ½ÄÀÇ Á÷Á¢Àû »óÈ£ ºñ±³ºÐ¼®À» ÅëÇØ Â÷ÀÌÀÇ Á¤µµ ¹× Â÷ÀÌ ¹ß»ý ¿øÀÎÀ» ±Ô¸íÇÔÀ¸·Î½á Á¶Á¤¹æ¹ý°£ Â÷ÀÌ¿¡ µû¸¥ ºÒ±ÕµîÀ» ÇØ¼ÒÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, °¢°¢ÀÇ ¹æ¹ý¿¡¼­ ¹ß°ßµÇ¾îÁö´Â ºÒÇÕ¸®¼º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÇÕ¸®Àû ¹æ¾ÈÀ» Á¦½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. °ø°øÁÖÅðǼ³°ø»çÀÇ °ÇÃà°ø»ç¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î µ¿Àϰø»çÀÇ °ø»ç¿ø°¡¿ä¼Ò Áï, Á÷Á¢Àç·áºñ, Á÷Á¢³ë¹«ºñ, ½ÇÀû°ø»çºñÀÇ Áö¼öÁ¶Á¤°ú ǰ¸ñÁ¶Á¤¹æ¹ý¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ¼¼ºÎ µî¶ô·üÀ» »êÁ¤ÇÏ¿© µÎ °¡Áö Á¶Á¤¹æ¹ý°£ Â÷À̸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ°í ±× ¿øÀÎÀ» ±Ô¸íÇÏ¿´´Ù. ºÐ¼®°á°ú ǰ¸ñÁ¶Á¤ÀÇ ¹æ¹ýÀÌ ºÐ¼® Àü¹Ý¿¡¼­ Áö¼ö Á¶Á¤¿¡ ºñÇØ µî¶ô·üÀÌ ³·°Ô »êÃâµÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, Â÷À̹߻ýÀÇ ÁÖ¿ä¿øÀÎÀ¸·Î °ßÀû´Ü°¡ÀÇ µî¶ô·ü »êÁ¤¹æ¹ý »óÀÌ, °ø»çÁ¾·ù ¹× °ø»çƯ¼º°ú ¹«°üÇÑ Áö¼ö Àû¿ë µî¿¡ ±âÀÎÇÑ °á°ú·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾ú´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸´Â °è¾à´ç»çÀÚ°£ ¿øÈ°ÇÑ °è¾à±Ý¾×Á¶Á¤À» À§ÇÏ¿© Á¶Á¤¹æ¹ý°£ Â÷À̸¦ Á÷Á¢ ´ëÀÀÇÏ¿© ºñ±³ºÐ¼®ÇÏ´Â ¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î, ½ÇÁ¦ ¹ß»ýµÇ´Â Â÷À̸¦ ½ÇüÀûÀ¸·Î Áõ¸íÇÏ¿´´Ù´Â Á¡¿¡ ÀÇÀǰ¡ ÀÖ´Ù.
There are index adjustment method and item adjustment method in estimation methods for price fluctuation rate of public constructions. A relevant regulation has put item adjustment method as a principle, but in most construction, contract sum adjustment has been made by index adjustment method. Hence, this study, by figuring out width and causes of the gap between index adjustment method and item adjustment method through direct comparative analysis, solved inequality caused by difference between them and suggested a rational way against irrationality of each method. For building operations of public housing construction, a detailed fluctuation rate by index adjustment method and item adjustment method of construction cost elements of the same construction, that is, direct material cost, direct labor cost and historical construction cost was estimated to analyze difference between two adjustments and establish its cause. Across the analysis, it was found that fluctuation rate by item adjustment method was estimated lower than that by index adjustment method and difference between methods for estimating fluctuation rate of quotation unit price and application of index unrelated to construction type and construction nature are main causes of the difference. This study has a significance in that, for smooth contract sum adjustment between contracting parties, it practically proved the real difference between adjustment methods by conducting comparative analysis of the difference in direct correspondence way.
 
Ű¿öµå
¹°°¡º¯µ¿;°è¾à±Ý¾×Á¶Á¤;¿¡½ºÄ÷¹À̼Ç;ǰ¸ñÁ¶Á¤;Áö¼öÁ¶Á¤;Escalation;Contract Sum Adjustment;Item Adjustment Method;Index Adjustment Method;
 
Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.13, no.1, 2012³â, pp.67-76
Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
ISSN : 2005-6095
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201208040009287)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿