¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ / v.20, no.5, 2011³â, pp.96-104
½Ç³»°ø°£ÀÇ À̹ÌÁö Æò°¡¿¡ ³ªÅ¸³­ Áֽýð£ Ư¼º¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸ - ½Ç³»°ø°£ À¯Çüº° Á¤º¸È¹µæÀ» Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î -
( A Study on Characteristics of Observation Time Found in Image Evaluation of Interior Space - Focusing on Acquisition of Spatial Information by Interior Space Types - )
ÃÖÁÖ¿µ;±èÁÖÇö;±èÁ¾ÇÏ;ÀÌÁ¤È£; °æºÏ´ëÇб³ °ÇÃà.Åä¸ñ°øÇкÎ;°æºÏ´ëÇб³ °ÇÃà°øÇаú;µ¿¾ç´ëÇб³ °ÇÃà¼Ò¹æÇàÁ¤Çаú;°æºÏ´ëÇб³ °ÇÃà.Åä¸ñ°øÇкÎ;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
Assuming that different spatial types involves the change of observation time to acquire the spatial information, this study intended to analyze the observation time by interior space types and derive the proper time for spatial evaluation. Coming to the study method, in order to analyze the characteristics of observation time in the image evaluation of interior space by types, it looked into the observation time chosen by the testees during evaluation. The findings of this study are as follows: First, the observation time differed by genders and spatial types: men's average time was longest for modern (93.3 sec.) and natural (89.4 sec.) spaces; women's average time was longest for classic space (110.7 sec.), which was the shortest for men. Second, the intensity of observation time zone differed by spatial types: this finding can imply that different design types require different establishment of observation time for evaluation even if the spatial elements are the same. Third, analyzing the distribution of time zones chosen by most testees showed that men's observation time zones were more intensely distributed than those of women. Fourthly, the observation lime for general space could be derived from the gender-based comparison that excluded the difference by types, but considering that different design types lead to different observation time, it could be seen as proper for evaluation of interior space to establish the difference of observation time by spatial types. Finally, Analysis showed the highest preference to the time '(3)'. However, obtaining information presented is the most highly effective time is '(6). Thus, the preferred time zone is different and effective, according to the results of the analysis.
 
Ű¿öµå
½Ç³»°ø°£À¯Çü;±â¾ï;Áֽýð£;Á¤º¸È¹µæ;µðÀÚÀοä¼Ò;Interior space type;Memory;Observation time;Information acquisition;Design elements;
 
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.20, no.5, 2011³â, pp.96-104
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-7992
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201106654856913)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿