¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ / v.10, no.1, 1997³â, pp.58-63
îÍíúè®Óø¿Í õöîóî§Öù°¡ ¸¶ÀÇ îÍíú°ú ù¡òõ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ç¯úÂ
( Effect of Storage Temperature and Keeping Materials on Storability and Quality of Chinese Yam )
±è¿µ±¤; ;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
ÃÖ±Ù Çѹæ(ùÛÛ°)ÀÇ »ý¾àÁ¦(ßæå·ð¥) ¶Ç´Â »ý½Ä¿ë(ßæãÝéÄ)À¸·Î¼­ ¸¶ÀÇ ¼Òºñ·®Àº ±Þ°ÝÈ÷ Áõ´ëµÇ°í ÀÖ¾î ³âÁß(Ò´ñé) ÃâÇÏ(õóùÃ)¸¦ À§ÇÑ ¾ÈÁ¤ÀûÀÎ ÀúÀ广¹ýÀÌ ¼³Á¤µÇ¾î¾ß ÇÒ °ÍÀÌ´Ù. º» ½ÃÇèÀº ¸¶ÀÇ ÀúÀå¿¡ °üÇÑ Á¤º¸¸¦ Á¦°øÇϰíÀÚ ÀúÀå¿Âµµ¿Í ÃæÀüÀç(õöîóî§)¿¡ µû¸¥ ÀúÀå ¶Ç´Â »óǰ¼º°ú °ü·ÃµÈ ÇüÁúÀÇ º¯È­¸¦ Á¶»çÇÏ¿´´ø ¹Ù ±× °á°ú¸¦ ¿ä¾à(é©å³)ÇÏ¸é ´ÙÀ½°í °°´Ù. 1. ÃæÀüÀç(õöîóî§)¿¡ µû¸¥ °ÇÀü°³Ã¼À²Àº »ó¿ÂÀúÀå°ú Àú¿ÂÀúÀå ¸ðµÎ vermiculite¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÒ °æ¿ì °¡Àå ³ô¾Ò°í »ó¿ÂÀúÀå¿¡¼­´Â Èë, Àú¿ÂÀúÀå¿¡¼­´Â PE filmÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÒ °æ¿ì °¡Àå ³·¾Ò´Ù. ÇÑÆí Áß·®°¨¼ÒÀ²Àº »ó¿Â°ú Àú¿ÂÀúÀå ¸ðµÎ Å¸ÃæÁøÀç(öâõöîóî§)¿¡ ºñÇÏ¿© PE film°ú vermiculite¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÒ °æ¿ì °¡Àå ³·¾Ò´Ù. 2. ÃæÀüÀç°ú(õöîóî§Î¡)¿¡ µû¸¥ ÀúÀå ÈÄ »óǰ¼º(ßÂù¡àõ)°ú °ü·ÃµÈ ¸íµµ(Ù¥Óø)¿Í ¼öºÐÇÔ·®(â©ÝÂùßÕá)Àº Àú¿ÂÀúÀå¿¡ ºñÇÏ¿© »ó¿ÂÀúÀå¿¡¼­ ³·¾ÒÀ¸¸ç, ÃæÀüÀç(õöîóî§)´Â Àú¿ÂÀúÀå¿¡¼­ PE filmÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÒ °æ¿ì ¸íµµ ¹× »öµµ a°ªÀÌ ³ô°í »öµµ b°ªÀÌ ³·Àº ¹Ý¸é, vermiculite¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÒ °æ¿ì PE film°ú´Â »ó¹ÝµÈ °á°ú¸¦ º¸¿´´Ù. 3. ÃæÀüÀç·áº° ÀúÀå ÈÄ »óǰ¼ö·®Àº °ÇÀü°³Ã¼À² ¶Ç´Â ¼öºÐÇÔ·®°ú Á¤(ïá)ÀÇ »ó°ü(ßÓμ)À» º¸ÀÎ ¹Ý¸é, ºÎÆÐÁ¤µµ°¡ $30sim60%$, 60% ÀÌ»óÀÎ °Í, Áß·®°¨¼ÒÀ² ¶Ç´Â »öµµ b°ª°ú ºÎ(ݶ)ÀÇ »ó°ü(ßÓμ)À¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾ú´Ù.
The experiment was done to clarify the effect of keeping material and storage temperature on weight and quality of Chinese yam (Dioscorea opposita) tuber. After the yam tubers were placed into the plastic boxes filled with different keeping materials [polyethylene (PE) film, hull, soil, sand, vermiculite], they were stored under different storage temperature(room, cold) from Oct. 15 to Mar. 15 when all the characters related to the tubers were measured. Soil or PE film as keeping materials was the lowest sound tuber rate when stored at room or cold temperature, respectively, while vermiculite was the highest in both storage temperature. When PE film and vermiculite in both storage temperatures were used as keeping materials, tuber weight were less reduced than the others. Brightness of chromaticity and moisture content were lower in room temperature storage than in cold temperature storage although the characteristics related to marketability were not affected by storage temperature. PE film had greater brightness and value 'a' of chromaticity but lower its 'b' value in the latter temperature than in the former temperature. Vermiculite, however, did the reverse result in comparison with PE film.
 
Ű¿öµå
 
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸÁö / v.10, no.1, 1997³â, pp.58-63
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-3591
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO199711920278589)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿