¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ / v.16, no.3, 2003³â, pp.223-229
¾ç¾×À̿ ³óµµ Â÷À̰¡ ¿ÀÀÌÀÇ »ýÀ°°ú ¼ö·®¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ
( Effect of ionic Strength of Nutrient Solution on Growth and Yield in Cucumber(Cucumis sativus L.) )
±Çº´¼±;Á¤ÇöÈñ;½Åµ¿¿µ;±èÇÐÁø;ÀÓÁØÅÃ;Çö±Ôȯ;½ÅÁ¤½Ä; ¼øÃµ´ëÇб³ ³ó¾÷»ý¸í°úÇдëÇÐ;¼øÃµ´ëÇб³ ³ó¾÷»ý¸í°úÇдëÇÐ;¼øÃµ´ëÇб³ ³ó¾÷»ý¸í°úÇдëÇÐ;¼øÃµ´ëÇб³ ³ó¾÷»ý¸í°úÇдëÇÐ;¼øÃµ´ëÇб³ ³ó¾÷»ý¸í°úÇдëÇÐ;¼øÃµ´ëÇб³ ³ó¾÷»ý¸í°úÇдëÇÐ;¼øÃµ´ëÇб³ ÀÚ¿¬°úÇдëÇÐ;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸´Â ¾ç¾×Àç¹è ¿ÀÀÌÀÇ »ýÀå°ú ¼ö·®¿¡ ³ª»Û ¿µÇâÀ» ÁÖÁö ¾Ê´Â ÀûÁ¤ ¾ç¾× ³óµµ¸¦ ±¸¸íÇϱâ À§Çؼ­ ¾ç¾×ÀÇ À̿ ³óµµ¸¦ ´Þ¸®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. YamazakiÀÇ ¿ÀÀÌ Ã³¹æÀ» ±âº»À¸·Î ÇÏ¿© 1/4, 1/2, 3/4, 1, 3/2, 2 ¹è³óµµ¸¦ »óÀÌÇÏ°Ô Ã³¸®ÇÏ¿© »ýÀå Æ¯¼º, ¼ö·® ¹× Áú¼Ò ÇÔ·®À» ºñ±³ÇϰíÀÚ ¼öÇàÇÏ¿´°í ±× °á°ú¸¦ ¿ä¾àÇÏ¸é ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. 1. »ýÀ° ½Ã±âº° ÃÊÀå°ú ¿±¼öÀÇ Áõ°¡¼Óµµ´Â Àú ³óµµ ±¸ÀÎ 1/2¹è ³óµµ¿¡¼­ °¡Àå ºü¸¥ Áõ°¡¼Óµµ¸¦ º¸¿´´Ù. 2. ¾ç¾×ÀÇ ÀÌ¿Â³óµµ Â÷ÀÌ¿¡ µû¸¥ ¿ÀÀÌÀÇ »ýÀ° ÇüÁúÀº À¯ÀÇÀûÀÎ »ýÀåÀÇ Â÷À̰¡ ÀÎÁ¤µÇÁö ¾Ê¾ÒÀ¸¸ç, »ýÀ° ½Ã±âº° ÃÊÀå, °æÀå°ú ¿±¸éÀûÀº 1/2¹è ³óµµ±¸¿¡¼­ ¼öÄ¡»óÀ¸·Î °¡Àå ³ôÀº °ªÀ» º¸¿´´Ù. 3. ¾ç¾×ÀÇ ÀÌ¿Â³óµµ Â÷ÀÌ¿¡ µû¸¥ ¿ÀÀÌÀÇ °ú½Ç¼ö·®Àº À¯ÀÇÀûÀÎ Â÷À̰¡ ÀÎÁ¤µÇÁö ¾Ê¾ÒÀ¸¸ç ÁÖ¼ö¿¡¼­´Â °í³óµµ±¸ÀÎ 2¹è ³óµµ°¡ 86.00, 86.75·Î °¡Àå ³ôÀº °ªÀ» º¸¿´°í, °ú½Ç¼ö´Â 1/4¹è ³óµµ¿Í Ç¥ÁØ ³óµµ¿¡¼­ °¡Àå ³·Àº 74.25, 85.25¸¦ º¸¿´À¸³ª ¼ö·®¿¡¼­´Â Àú ³óµµÀÎ 1/2¹è ³óµµ¿Í 3/4¹è ³óµµ°¡ °¡Àå ³ôÀº 22.60, 22.07kgÀ» º¸¿´´Ù. 4. Áú¼ÒÇÔ·®Àº À¯ÀÇÀûÀÎ Â÷À̰¡ ÀÎÁ¤µÇÁö ¾Ê¾ÒÀ¸¸ç, l/2¹è ³óµµ¿¡¼­ ´ëüÀûÀ¸·Î ³ôÀº ÇÔ·®À» º¸¿´´Ù. 5. ¾ç¾×ÀÇ ÀÌ¿Â³óµµ Â÷ÀÌ¿¡ µû¶ó Á¤½ÄÈÄ 36ÀÏ Á¶»ç ½Ã±âÀÇ ¸ðµç »ýÀ°ÇüÁú°ú ¼ö·® Ư¼º¿¡¼­ ¼öÄ¡»óÀ¸·Î ³ôÀº °ªÀ» º¸ÀÎ 1/2¹è ³óµµ¿¡¼­ÀÇ »ó°ü°ü°è´Â ÃÊÀå°ú °æÀåÀº °íµµ·Î À¯ÀÇÇÑ Á¤ÀÇ »ó°ü°ü°è¸¦, ÃÊÀå°ú ¿±¸éÀû¿¡¼­´Â À¯ÀÇÇÑ Á¤ÀÇ »ó°ü°ü°è¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³Â°í, ÁÖ¼ö¿Í °ú½Ç¼ö´Â °íµµ·Î À¯ÀÇÇÑ Á¤ÀÇ »ó°ü°ü°è¸¦, °ú½Ç¼ö¿Í ¼ö·®Àº À¯ÀÇÇÑ Á¤ ÀÇ »ó°üÀ» ³ªÅ¸³Â´Ù.
This study was carried out to investigate the optimum ionic strength of nutrient solution were treated with a quarter, a half, three quarters, standard, one and half, and double ionic strength of balanced nutrient solution of Yamazaki solution recommended for cucumber plants. Plant height and number of loaves of growing period were rapidly increased in 1/2 ionic strength of nutrient solution. Growth characteristics of cucumber plant as affected by the different ionic strength of nutrient solution were not significant differences, however, in the growing period, plant height, stem length and leaf area were highest in 1/2 ionic strength of nutrient solution. Fruit yield of cucumber plant as affected by the different ionic strength of nutrient solution was not significant differences, however, fruit yield was highest in 1/2 ionic strength of the lowering ionic strength of nutrient solution. Nitrogen concentration was not significant differences, however, it was high corcentration in 1/2 ionic strength of nutrient solution. Growth and yield characteristic of cucumber as affected by 1/2 ionic strength of nutrient solution at 36 days transplanting analyzed correlation cofficient. Plant height showed positive correlated with number of plant and positive correlated with yield.
 
Ű¿öµå
Nutrient solution;Plant height;Number of leaves;Growth characteristics;
 
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸÁö / v.16, no.3, 2003³â, pp.223-229
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-3591
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200311922145504)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿