¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ / v.18, no.2, 2005³â, pp.315-324
¹Ì¼±³ª¹« ÀÚ»ýÁö ÁÖº¯ÀÇ Ãʺ»±º¶ô°ú ½Ä¹°»ó ºÐ¼®
( Analysis on Herbaceous Communities and Flora around Abeliophyllum distichum Habitats )
À¯ÁÖÇÑ;ÀÌöÈñ; ÃæÃ»ºÏµµ¼ö¸ñ »ê¾ßÃÊ¿¬±¸¼¾ÅÍ;ÃæºÏ´ëÇб³ ¿ø¿¹Çаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸´Â ¹Ì¼±³ª¹« ÀÚ»ýÁö ÁÖº¯ÀÇ ½Ä¹°»ó°ú Ãʺ»±º¶ôÀ» ü°èÀûÀÌ°í °´°üÀûÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®ÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ÀÚ»ýÁö º¹¿ø ¹× º¸Àü´ëÃ¥¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ±âÃÊÀÚ·á Á¦°øÀ» À§ÇØ ¼öÇàµÇ¾ú´Ù. ½Ä¹°»ó Á¶»ç°á°ú, °¡Àå ¸¹Àº ºÐ·ù±ºÀ» º¸ÀÎ Áö¿ªÀº ±«»ê±º À²Áö¸®(III)·Î 48°ú 91¼Ó 99Á¾ 15º¯Á¾ µî ÃÑ 114ºÐ·ù±ºÀÌ Á¶»çµÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, °¡Àå ÀûÀº Áö¿ªÀº ÁøÃµ±º ¿ëÁ¤¸®(V)·Î 28°ú 49¼Ó 47Á¾ 7º¯Á¾ µî ÃÑ 54ºÐ·ù±ºÀÌ ÃâÇöÇÏ¿´´Ù. Ãʺ»±º¶ôÀÇ ¿ìÁ¡Á¾Àº ȯ»ïµ¢±¼°ú ¾¦(±«»ê±º ÃßÁ¡¸® I), ÁÖ¸§Á¶°³Ç®(±«»ê±º ¼Û´ö¸® II¿Í ¿µµ¿À¾ ¸Åõ¸® IV), ´ë»çÃÊ${cdot}$Ħ${cdot}$¾¦(±«»ê±º À²Áö¸® III), µ¢±¼´ßÀÇÀåÇ®(ÁøÃµ±º ¿ëÁ¤¸® V), Á¶¸´´ë(ºÎ¾È±º Á߰踮 VI)·Î È®ÀεǾú´Ù. »ó°ü°ü°èºÐ¼® °á°ú, ¾¦°ú ´ë»çÃÊ, Á¶¸´´ë¿Í ±èÀÇÅÐ, Á¶¸´´ë¿Í û¹Ì·¡µ¢±¼, ±èÀÇÅаú û¹Ì·¡µ¢±¼ÀÌ ¸Å¿ì ³ôÀº »ó°ü¼ºÀ» º¸¿´´Ù. À¯»çµµÁö¼ö ºÐ¼®°á°ú, À¯»çµµÁö¼ö°¡ °¡Àå ³ôÀº °ÍÀº III°ú VIÁö¿ªÀ¸·Î $27.27%$¸¦ º¸¿´´Ù. ȯ°æ¿äÀΰú ½Ä¹°Á¾¼ö°£ÀÇ È¸±ÍºÐ¼® °á°ú, ÇØ¹ß°íµµ¿Í ½Ä¹°Á¾¼öÀÇ ¼³¸í·ÂÀº ¾à $70.0%$¿´´Ù.
The study was carried out to offer the raw data on counterplan of restoration and conservation by systematical and objective analyzing the flora and herbaceous communities around Abeliophyllum distichum habitats. In the results of flora survey, as the site that the most taxa were showed was Yulji-ri, Geosan-gun III, there was surveyed as 114 ones; 48 families, 91 genera, 99 species and 15 varieties, and as Younjeong-ri, Jincheon-gun V was showed the fewest ones, there was appeared 54 ones; 28 families, 49 genera, 47 species and 7 varieties. The dominant species of herbaceous communities were verified Humulus japonicus${cdot}$Artemisia princeps var. orientalis(Chujeom-ri, Goesan-gun I), Oplismenus undulatifolius(Songdeok-ri, Goesan-gun II and Maechon-ri, Yeongdong-eup IV), Carex siderosticta${cdot}$Pueraria thunbergiana${cdot}$Artemisia princeps var. orientalis(Yulji-ri, Geosan-gun III), Streptolirion cordifolium(Younjeong-ri, Jincheon-Eun V) and Sasa borealis(Junggye-ri, Buan-gun IV). In correlation analysis, Artemisia princeps var. orientalis${cdot}$Carex siderosticta, Sasa borealis${cdot}$Festuca ovina, Sasa borealis${cdot}$Smilax china and Festuca ovina${cdot}$Smilax china were showed the highest relativity. In similarity index analysis, as the site that was showed highest value was Yulji-ri, Geosan-gun III and Maechon-ri, Yeongdong-eup IV, there was turned up about some $27.27%$. In the results of regression analysis between environmental factors and number of species, R-square of altitude and number of species was some $70.0%$.
 
Ű¿öµå
vascular plant;rare and endanger plant;natural monument;conservation;
 
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸÁö / v.18, no.2, 2005³â, pp.315-324
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-3591
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200504704040287)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿