¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ / v.18, no.3, 2005³â, pp.367-373
¼öÁý ¾¦¼Ó ÀÚ¿øÀÇ »ýÀ°Æ¯¼º ¸ðÇü
( Growth Characteristic Models of Collected Artemisia Resources )
À¯ÁÖÇÑ;Á¶Èï¿ø;ÀÌöÈñ; ÃæÃ»ºÏµµ¼ö¸ñ »ê¾ßÃÊ¿¬±¸¼¾ÅÍ;ÃæÃ»ºÏµµ¼ö¸ñ »ê¾ßÃÊ¿¬±¸¼¾ÅÍ;ÃæºÏ´ëÇб³ ¿ø¿¹Çаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº ¾¦¼Ó ÀÚ¿ø¿¡ ´ëÇÑ »ýÀ°ÀÎÀÚ°£ »ó°ü¼º ±¸¸í°ú »ýÀ°ÀÎÀÚ ¸ðÇü °³¹ßÀ» À§ÇØ ¼öÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. »ýÀ°ÀÎÀÚÀÇ Æ¯¼º¿¡¼­ ÃÊÀå ÃÊÆø, ¿±º´Àå, ¿±·Ï¼Ò·®Àº ´õÀ§Áö±â, ¿±ÀåÀº ³ÐÀºÀÙ¿ÜÀÙ¾¦, ¿±ÆøÀº ¾¦, ÁÙ±âÁ÷°æÀº »±¾¦, ¿²µÎ²²´Â ´õÀ§Áö±â, ¾¦, »ê¾¦, ³ÐÀº ÀÙ¿ÜÀÙ¾¦, ±×´Ã¾¦ÀÌ °¡Àå ³ôÀº °ªÀ» ³ªÅ¸³Â´Ù. »ýÀ°ÀÎÀÚ °£ »ó°üºÐ¼® °á°ú »çö¾¦Àº ¿±Æø°ú ÁÙ±âÁ÷°æ, »ê¾¦Àº ÃÊÀå°ú ÃÊÆø, ³ÐÀºÀÙ¿ÜÀÙ¾¦Àº ÃÊÀå°ú ¿±Æø, ³ª¸ÓÁö Á¾µéÀº ¿±Àå°ú ¿±ÆøÀÌ ³ôÀº »ó°ü¼ºÀ» º¸¿´´Ù. »ýÀ°ÀÎÀÚ ¸ðÇü ºÐ¼® °á°ú »çö¾¦Àº ¾à $79.4%$, ¾¦Àº ¾à $91.7%$, »ê¾¦Àº ¾à $70.3%$, ´õÀ§Áö±â´Â ¾à $49.0%$, ³ÐÀºÀÙ¿ÜÀÙ¾¦Àº ¾à $72.5%$, ±×´Ã¾¦Àº ¾à $75.0%$, »±¾¦Àº ¾à $60.4%$, ´ýºÒ¾¦Àº ¾à $54.4%$ÀÇ ¼³¸í·ÂÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù.
The purposes of this dissertation were to examine relativity between growth characteristics factors and develop the model of growth characteristics. In the result of statistical summaries of the factors in growth characteristic, the highest level of correlation was in plant height, plant width, petiole and chlorophyll in the case of Artemisia iwayomogi; leaf length, in the case of A. stolonifera;, leaf width, of A. princeps var. orientalis;, diameter, of A. feddei;, leaf thickness, of A. iwayomogi, A. princeps var. orientalis, A. montana, A. stolonifera, A. sylnatica; leaf length and leaf width of the other species. In the case of correlation analysis, leaf width and diameter were most correlative in A. capillaris;, plant height and plant width, in A. montana; plant height and leaf width, in A. stolonifera; leaf length and leaf width, in other species. The results of model analysis of growth characteristics were as follows. A. capillaris proved to be about $79.4%$ effective ; A. princeps var. orientalis, about $91.7%$ ; A. montana, about $70.3%$ ; A. iwayomogi, about $49.0%$ ; A. stolonifera, about $72.5%$; A. sylnatica, about $75.0%$;, A. feddei about $60.4%$ ; A. rubripes about $54.0%$.
 
Ű¿öµå
Artemisia;relativity;resource plant;model;
 
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸÁö / v.18, no.3, 2005³â, pp.367-373
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-3591
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200507523330005)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿