|
|
|
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ / v.19, no.2, 2006³â, pp.344-347
|
°ü¼ö¹æ½Ä¿¡ µû¸¥ Äᳪ¹°ÀÇ »ýÀå°ú Àç¹è¿ë±â ³»ÀÇ ¿Âµµ º¯È
( Effect of Watering Methods on Growth of Soybean Sprout and Culture Temperature ) |
| Àüº´»ï;È«µ¿¿À;±èÈ«¿µ;ÀÌâ¿ì;°ÁøÈ£; °æ»ó´ëÇб³ ³ó¾÷»ý¸í°úÇдëÇÐ;°æ»ó´ëÇб³ ³ó¾÷»ý¸í°úÇдëÇÐ;°æ»ó´ëÇб³ ³ó¾÷»ý¸í°úÇдëÇÐ;°æ»ó´ëÇб³ ³ó¾÷»ý¸í°úÇдëÇÐ;°æ»ó´ëÇб³ »ý¸í°úÇבּ¸¿ø;
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
| ÃÊ ·Ï |
| Äᳪ¹° »ý»êÀº °ü¼ö¹æ¹ý¿¡ µû¶ó »ó¸é»ì¼ö½Ä°ú Çϸé´ã¼ö½ÄÀ¸·Î ±¸ºÐµÈ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸´Â ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ °ü¼ö¹æ¹ýÀÌ »ý»ê¼öÀ²°ú »óǰ¼º¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» ÆÄ¾ÇÇϰíÀÚ ÁØÀú¸®¸¦ °ø½ÃÀç·á·Î »ó¸é»ì¼ö¿Í Çϸé´ã¼ö ¹æ½ÄÀ¸·Î °ü¼ö¹æ¹ýÀ» ´Þ¸®ÇÏ¿© Äᳪ¹°ÀÇ »ýÀå, ÇüÅÂ, »öµµ, Àü´Ü·Â°ú Àç¹è¿ë±â³»ÀÇ ¿Âµµº¯È¸¦ Á¶»çÇϰíÀÚ ½Ç½ÃµÇ¾ú´ø ¹Ù ±× °á°ú¸¦ ¿ä¾àÇÏ¸é ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. 1. ǰÁú°ú °ü·ÃµÈ ¼¼±ÙÀÇ Çü¼ºÀº »ó¸é»ì¼ö ¹æ½Äº¸´Ù Çϸé´ã¼ö ¹æ½ÄÀ¸·Î Àç¹èÇÒ °æ¿ì ¸¹¾Ò´Ù. 2. ÇϹèÃà°ú»Ñ¸® ±æÀ̸¦ ÇÕÇÑ Àüü ±æÀÌ´Â °ü¼ö¹æ¹ý°£¿¡ Â÷À̰¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù. ±×·¯³ª ÇϹèÃàÀº »ó¸é»ì¼ö ¹æÀû¿¡¼ ±æ¾ú´ø ¹Ý¸é, »Ñ¸®´Â Çϸé´ã¼ö ¹æ½Ä¿¡¼ ±æ¾ú´Ù. ÇϹèÃà Áß°£°ú hook Á÷°æÀº »ó¸é»ì¼ö ¹æ½Ä¿¡ ºñÇÏ¿© Çϸé´ã¼ö ¹æ½Ä¿¡¼ ±½Àº °ÍÀ¸·Î Á¶»çµÇ¾ú´Ù. 3. °³Ã¼´ç ÀÚ¿±, »Ñ¸® ¹× Àüü »ýüÁß°ú °Ç¹°ÁßÀº °ü¼ö¹æ¹ý°£¿¡ Â÷À̰¡ ¾ø¾úÀ¸³ª, ÇϹèÃàÀÇ »ý°èÁß°ú °Ç¹°ÁßÀº »ó¸é»ì¼ö ¹æ½Äº¸´Ù´Â Çϸé´ã¼ö ¹æ½ÄÀ¸·Î Àç¹èÇÒ °æ¿ì ¸¹¾Ò´Ù. 4. Àç¹èÅë ³»ÀÇ ¿Âµµ´Â Àç¹è±â°£ ³»³» Çϸé´ã¼ö ¹æ½Äº¸´Ù´Â »ó¸é »ì¼ö ¹æ½Ä¿¡¼ ³ô¾ÒÀ¸¸ç, µÎ °ü¼ö¹æ¹ý°£ ¿Âµµ Â÷ÀÌ´Â Àç¹è 3ÀÏ ÀÌÈĺÎÅÍ °è¼Ó Ä¿Áö´Â °æÇâÀ» º¸¿´´Ù. |
|
| Watering methods for soybean sprouts could be mainly divided into two groups of overspraying and underwatering. The study was carried out to determine the effect of water supplying method on growth, morphological characteristics, colour and cutting resistance of soybean (cv. Junjery) sprouts and culture temperatures. The morphological characters, fresh and dry weights were measured on the 6th day after their culture, but daily mean temperatures inside the plastic culture boxes were measured by data-loggers. Lateral roots were more formed in the underwatering method (UM) than in the overspraying method (OM). Although their total lengths of both methods were nearly same, OM had longer hypocotyl but UM did longer root than the other. Middle and upper parts of hypocotyl were more thickened in UM than in OM. UM showed more hypocotyl fresh and dry weights than OM. There was, however, no significant difference between the two methods in cotyledon, root, total fresh and dry weights although the culture temperature was higher in OM than in UM. |
| |
| Ű¿öµå |
| Soybean (Glycine max L.) sprout;Water supplying method;Growth;Morphological characters;Temperature; |
| |
|
|
 |
|
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸÁö / v.19, no.2, 2006³â, pp.344-347
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-3591
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200622219605451)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î |
|
| ³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|
|