¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ / v.19, no.5, 2006³â, pp.606-611
½Äǰ÷°¡¹° Acetic Acid¿Í Propionic Acid 󸮳󵵿¡ µû¸¥ Äᳪ¹°ÀÇ »ýÀå°ú ÇüÅ º¯È­
( Effects of Food Additive Acetic Acids and Propionic Acids on Growth and Morphological Characters of Soybean Sprouts )
È«µ¿¿À;Àü½ÂÈ£;Àüº´»ï;ÀÌâ¿ì;±èÈ«¿µ;°­ÁøÈ£; °æ»ó´ëÇб³ ³ó¾÷»ý¸í°úÇдëÇÐ;°æ»ó´ëÇб³ ³ó¾÷»ý¸í°úÇдëÇÐ;°æ»ó´ëÇб³ ³ó¾÷»ý¸í°úÇдëÇÐ;°æ»ó´ëÇб³ ³ó¾÷»ý¸í°úÇдëÇÐ;°æ»ó´ëÇб³ ³ó¾÷»ý¸í°úÇдëÇÐ;°æ»ó´ëÇб³ »ý¸í°úÇבּ¸¿ø;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
ºÎÆÐ´Â Äᳪ¹° Àç¹è¿¡¼­ ±Øº¹ÇÏ¿©¾ß ÇÒ ¹®Á¦ÁßÀÇ ÇϳªÀÌ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸´Â Äᳪ¹° Àç¹è¿¡¼­ ºÎÆÐ¿ÏÈ­¿ëÀ¸·Î ½Äǰ÷°¡¹°ÀÇ ÀÌ¿ë °¡´É¼ºÀ» °ËÅäÇϰíÀÚ ÀºÇÏÄá, dz»ê³ª¹°Äá ¹× ¿À¸®¾ËŸ¦ °ø½ÃǰÁ¾À¸·Î ½Äǰ÷°¡¹°ÀÇ Á¾·ù(acetic acid, propionic acid)¿Í ³óµµ(0, 0.1, 0.2%)°¡ Äᳪ¹°ÀÇ »ýÀå°ú ÇüÅÂ, º´¹Ý Çü¼º, 󸮺ñ¿ë¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» Á¶»çÇϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´´ø ¹Ù ±× °á°ú¸¦ ¿ä¾àÇÏ¸é ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. 1. »óǰȭ°¡ °¡´ÉÇÑ ÇϹèÃà ±æÀ̰¡ 4cm ÀÌ»óÀÇ ºñÀ²Àº ¿À¸®¾ËÅ¿¡¼­ °¡Àå ³ô°í ÀºÇÏÄá¿¡¼­ °¡Àå ³·¾Ò°í, ½Äǰ÷°¡¹° Á¾·ù°£¿¡´Â Â÷À̰¡ ¾ø¾ú´ø ¹Ý¸é, 󸮳󵵰¡ ³ôÀ»¼ö·Ï Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. 2. ÇϹèÃàÀº ÀºÇÏÄá°ú ¿À¸®¾ËÅ¿¡ ºñÇÏ¿© dz»ê³ª¹°Äá¿¡¼­ ±æ¾úÀ¸¸ç, ÇϹèÃà Áß°£ºÎºÐÀº dz»ê³ª¹°Äá°ú ¿À¸®¾ËÅ¿¡ ºñÇÏ¿© ÀºÇÏÄá¿¡¼­ ±½¾ú´Ù. ±×·¯³ª À̵é ÇϹèÃà ±æÀÌ¿Í Á÷°æÀº ½Äǰ÷°¡¹° Á¾·ù¿Í 󸮳󵵰£¿¡´Â Â÷À̰¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù. 3. »ý»ê¼öÀ²°ú °ü·ÃµÈ °³Ã¼´ç Àüü »ýüÁßÀº ÀºÇÏÄá°ú dz»ê³ª¹°Äá¿¡ ºñÇÏ¿© ¿À¸®¾ËÅ¿¡¼­ ¸¹¾Ò´ø ¹Ý¸é, ½Äǰ÷°¡¹° Á¾·ù¿Í 󸮳󵵰£¿¡´Â Â÷À̰¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù. 4. ÀÚ¿±¿¡ Çü¼ºµÈ º´¹Ý¼ö´Â ½Äǰ÷°¡¹° Á¾·ù°£¿¡´Â Â÷À̰¡ ¾ø¾ú´ø ¹Ý¸é, À̵éÀ» ó¸®ÇÏÁö ¾Ê´Â °Íº¸´Ù´Â ó¸®ÇÒ °æ¿ì °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´´Ù. 5. 󸮺ñ¿ëÀ» °í·ÁÇÒ °æ¿ì acetic acidº¸´Ù´Â propionic acid¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© Á¾ÀÚ¼Òµ¶À» ½Ç½ÃÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ °æÁ¦ÀûÀÎ °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾ú´Ù.
Decay during soybean sprout culture detracts their quality as well as increases their production costs. This study was done to determine the effects of acetic and propionic acids on growth and morphological characters of the sprouts. The soybean seeds of 3 cultivars (cv. Eunhakong, Pungsannamulkong and Orialtae) imbibed for 2 minutes at their different concentrations (0, 0.1 and 0.2%) were soaked for 6 hours in 4 ppm BA solution after the first 5.5 hour water imbibition and 0.5 hour aeration, and cultured at $20^{circ}C$. On the 6th day, harvested soybean sprouts were classified into 4 categories on the base of hypocotyl length;>7cm, 4 to 7cm,<4cm and not germinated, and their morphological characters, fresh weights, lesion spots on cotyledons were measured or analyzed. The stronger concentration the higher rate of longer than 4cm although there was no significant difference between the two acids. Pungsannamulkong showed the longest hypocotyls but Eunhakong did the thickest ones, and Orialtae did the greatest total fresh weight, in which all the characters were not influenced by the two acids and their concentrations. Lesion spots on the cotyledons were equal to the two acids although less in their treatments than in no treatment. Utilization of propionic acid was more desirable Dan acetic acid through their treatment cost analysis.
 
Ű¿öµå
Soybean sprout;Acid treatment;Growth;Morphology;Lesion spots;Treatment cost;
 
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸÁö / v.19, no.5, 2006³â, pp.606-611
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-3591
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200603043152856)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿