|
|
|
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ / v.15, no.1, 2002³â, pp.50-56
|
µ·ºÐ´¢ ¹ßÈ¿¾×À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ³ì»ö²É¾ç¹èÃß ¹× ¾ç¹Ì³ª¸® °üºñÀç¹è ½Ç¿ëÈ ¿¬±¸
( A Study on the Fertigation of Swine Liquid Manure for Broccoli and Celely Western Vegetables ) |
| ±è¿ø¹è;¹è¿øÈ£;Àå¼®¿ì;±Ç¿µ±â;Çã±Ç;ÀÓ»óö; °í·ÉÁö³ó¾÷½ÃÇèÀå;°í·ÉÁö³ó¾÷½ÃÇèÀå;°í·ÉÁö³ó¾÷½ÃÇèÀå;°í·ÉÁö³ó¾÷½ÃÇèÀå;°¿ø´ëÇб³ ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°Çаú;»óÁö´ëÇб³ ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°Çаú;
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
| ÃÊ ·Ï |
| µ·ºÐ´¢ ¹ßÈ¿¾×À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ³ì»ö²É¾ç¹èÃß, ¾ç¹Ì³ª¸® °üºñÀç¹è È¿°ú¸¦ °ËÁ¤Çϰí À̶§ÀÇ ÀûÁ¤ ¾×ºñ³óµµ¸¦ ±¸¸íÇϰíÀÚ µ·ºÐ´¢ ¹ßÈ¿¾×À» 5, 10, 25 ±×¸®°í 50¹è Èñ¼®(Ef. 5, Ef. 10, Ef. 25, Ef. 50)ÇÏ¿© ½ÃÇèÇÑ °á°ú´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. ÀÛ¹° Àç¹è ÈÄ Åä¾çºÐ¼®°á°ú µÎ ÀÛ¹° °øÈ÷ »êµµ ¹× Ä®·ýÀº ¾×ºñ³óµµ°¡ ÁøÇÑ Ef. 5 󸮱¸¿¡¼ ³·¾ÒÀ¸³ª, Ef. 25, Ef. 50 󸮱¸¿¡¼´Â ³ô¾Ò´Ù. ¹Ý¸é Àü±â Àüµµµµ, Àλê, À¯±â¹°ÇÔ·®, ±×¸®°í Áú»êÅ Áú¼Ò´Â ¾×ºñ³óµµ°¡ ³·Àº Ef. 50 󸮱¸¿¡¼ ³·¾ÒÀ¸¸ç, Ef. 5 󸮱¸¿¡¼´Â ³ô¾ÆÁö´Â °æÇâÀ̾ú´Ù. ½Ä¹°Ã¼ ºÐ¼®Àº µÎÀÛ¹° °øÈ÷ ÃÑ Áú¼Ò´Â ¾×ºñ³óµµ°¡ ÁøÇØÁü¿¡ µû¶ó ½Ä¹°Ã¼³»ÀÇ ³óµµ°¡ Áõ°¡µÇ¾ú´Ù. À¯È¿ ÀλêÀº 󸮱¸¿¡ °ü°è¾øÀÌ Å« Â÷À̰¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù. »ýÀ°°ú ¼ö·®À» »ìÆìº¸¸é ³ì»ö²É¾ç¹èÃßÀÇ °æ¿ì ¿±Àå, ¿±Æø ¹× ÃÊÀåÀº Ef. 50¿¡¼ »ýÀ°ÀÌ °¡Àå ÁÁ¾Ò´Ù. È·Ú°í¿Í È·ÚÆøÀº ¾×ºñ³óµµ°¡ ³·Àº Ef. 25¿Í Ef. 50 󸮱¸¿¡¼ Å« °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç, È·ÚÁß ¶ÇÇÑ ¹«°Å¿ü´Ù. ¾ç¹Ì³ª¸® ´Â ¿±Àå¿¡¼ Ef. 25¿Í Ef. 50 󸮱¸¿¡¼ ÄÇÀ¸¸ç ,¼ö·®Àº °üÇà´ëºñ Ef. 25¿Í Ef. 50 󸮱¸¿¡¼ °¢°¢ 2¹è Áõ¼öµÇ¾úÀ¸³ª, °í³óµµ ó¸®ÀÎ Ef. 5¿¡¼ Å« ÆøÀ¸·Î °¨¼ÒµÇ¾ú´Ù. ÀÌ»óÀÇ °á°ú ³ì»ö²É¾ç¹èÃß ¹× ¾ç¹Ì³ª¸®ÀÇ °üºñÀç¹è½Ã ¹ßÈ¿µ·ºÐ´¢ÀÇ Èñ¼®³óµµ´Â 25¡50¹è°¡ ÀûÁ¤ÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. |
|
| This study was carried out to optimize the fertigation method using fermented swine liquid manure for the growth of two western vegetables, broccoli and celery. Plants were grown in a rain-shelter house and fertilized with a range of dilutions(efflux 5 dilution=Ef. 5, efflux 10 dilution=Ef. 10, efflux 25 dilution=Ef. 25, and efflux 50 dilution=Ef. 50) of the liquid manure or with conventional application of N : P$_2$O$_$5/ : K$_2$O = 200 : 70 : 500kg/ha for broccoli, 250 : 210 : 240 kg/ha for celery as controls. After harvest, soil pH and K content decreased after using a high concentration of the liquid manure, Ef. 5, than after treatment with weaker concentrations at Ef. 25 and Ef. 50. On the other hand, soil electrical conductivity, content of P$_2$O$_$5/, organic matter, total nitrogen, and NO$_3$-N at Ef. 5 increased as concentration of swine liquid manure increased. After harvest, available P$_2$O$_$5/ in plant tissue did not differ significantly between any of the treatments. In broccoli, the lower concentration (Ef. 50) of swine liquid manure increased flowering over the other treatments, perhaps because the level of absorption into the plants is higher with lower concentration. The amounts of K and Ca in plant tissue were greatest after Ef. 25 and Ef. 50 treatments. Plant growth was best at Ef. 50 in broccoli, head height, head width, and head weight were the best with Ef. 25 and Ef. 50 treatments after harvest. In celery, leaf length was greater after Ef. 25 and Ef. 50 treatments than any other treatments. Total yield of celery of Ef. 25 and Ef. 50 treatments was twice that of conventional cultivation. On the other hand, yield severely decreased after application of high-concentration treatment at Ef. 5. In conclusion, fertigation of swine liquid manure, diluted in the range of Ef. 25 to Ef. 50, could improve yield and quality in broccoli and celery. |
| |
| Ű¿öµå |
| plant tissue;head weight; |
| |
|
|
 |
|
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸÁö / v.15, no.1, 2002³â, pp.50-56
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-3591
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200211921163856)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î |
|
| ³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|
|