¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ / v.15, no.2, 2002³â, pp.159-163
¼öÈ®½Ã±â¿Í Ƚ¼ö¿¡ µû¸¥ »ï¹éÃÊ °æ¿±ÀÇ »ýÀ° ¹× ¼ö·®ÀÇ °æ½ÃÀû º¯È­
( Change of growth and yield of top part by different harvest date and number in Saururus chinensis bailley )
³²»ó¿µ;±èÀÎÀç;±è¹ÎÀÚ;ÀÌöÈñ;±èżö; ÃæºÏ³ó¾÷±â¼ú¿ø;ÃæºÏ³ó¾÷±â¼ú¿ø;ÃæºÏ³ó¾÷±â¼ú¿ø;ÃæºÏ³ó¾÷±â¼ú¿ø;ÃæºÏ³ó¾÷±â¼ú¿ø;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
»ï¹éÃÊÀÇ ¼öÈ®½Ã±â¿Í Ƚ¼ö¸¦ ´Þ¸®ÇÔÀ¸·Î½á »ýÀ°°ú °æ¿±¼ö·®¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» ±¸¸íÇÏ¿© Àç¹è¹ý°³¼±¿¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÑ ±âÃÊÀڷḦ ¾ò°íÀÚ ½ÃÇèÇÑ °á°ú¸¦ ¿ä¾àÇÏ¸é ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. 1. 1ȸ ¼öÈ®½ÃÀÇ »ýÀ°Àº 7¿ù 16Àϰú 7¿ù 31ÀÏ ¼öÈ®¿¡¼­ °¡Àå ¿Õ¼ºÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, 2ȸ ¼öÈ®½Ã´Â 1ȸ ¼öÈ®½Ã±â°¡ ºü¸¦¼ö·Ï ¾çÈ£ÇÏ¿´´Ù. 2. »óǰ °æ¿±¼ö·®Àº 7¿ù 31ÀϱîÁö´Â ¼öÈ®½Ã±â°¡ ´ÊÀ»¼ö·Ï ¸¹¾ÒÀ¸³ª, ÀÌÈÄ 10¿ù 16ÀÏ¿¡¼­´Â 41% ¼öÁØÀ¸·Î °¨¼ÒÆøÀÌ ÄÇ´Ù. 3. °Ç¹°À²Àº ¼öÈ®½Ã±â°¡ ´ÊÀ»¼ö·Ï ³ô¾ÆÁö´Â °æÇâÀ̾ú´Ù.
This study was carried out to investigate change of growth and yield of top part by different harvest date and number in Saururus chinensis. Top part of the first harvest date showed the most effective growth on July 16 and July 31, and that of the second harvest date was greater than that of the as first harvest date. Harvest dates up to July 31 increased yield of marketable leaf and stem, but the later Harvest date decreased yield as low as 41£¥ .Percentage of dry mater was higher as the harvest date was delayed.
 
Ű¿öµå
Saururus chinensis;Harvest date and number;Growth and top part yield;
 
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸÁö / v.15, no.2, 2002³â, pp.159-163
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-3591
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200211921164145)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿