¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ / v.14, no.1, 2001³â, pp.84-88
°í·©Áö °á±¸»óÃßÀÇ °üºñÀç¹è½Ã µ·ºÐ´¢ ¹ßÈ¿¾×ºñ ½Ã¿ëÈ¿°ú
( Effect of Application on the Growth of Head Lettuce under Fertigation Conditions in Highland )
±è¿ø¹è;±Ç¿µ±â;Àå¼®¿ì;ÀÓ»óö; ³óÃÌÁøÈïû °í·ÉÁö³ó¾÷½ÃÇèÀå;³óÃÌÁøÈïû °í·ÉÁö³ó¾÷½ÃÇèÀå;³óÃÌÁøÈïû °í·ÉÁö³ó¾÷½ÃÇèÀå;»óÁö´ëÇб³ ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°Çаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
µ·ºÐ´¢ ¹ßÈ¿¾×ºñ¸¦ ¾çä·ùÀÎ °á±¸»óÃßÀÇ Àç¹è¿¡ ºñ·á¿øÀ¸·Î Ȱ¿ëÇϸ鼭 ȯ°æ¿À¿° ºÎ´ãÀ» °æ°¨ÇϰíÀÚ °­¿øµµ °í·©Áö Áö¿ªÀÎ ´ë°ü·É¿¡¼­ ¼öÇàÇÑ ¿¬±¸°á°ú¸¦ ¿ä¾àÇÏ¸é ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. µ·ºÐ´¢ ¹ßÈ¿¾×À» Åä¾ç¿¡ ó¸®ÇÏ¿´À» ¶§ ´ëÁ¶±¸ÀÎ È­Çкñ·á½Ã¿ë±¸¿¡ ºñÇØ¼­ °á±¸»óÃßÀÇ »ýÀ°ÀÌ Áõ°¡ÇÏ´Â °æÇâÀ» º¸¿´À¸¸ç, ¼ö·®Àº µ·ºÐ´¢ ¹ßÈ¿¾× 󸮱¸¿¡¼­µµ Àú³óµµÀÎ 50¹è Èñ¼®±¸¿¡¼­ °¡Àå ³ô¾Ò´Ù. µ·ºÐ´¢ ¹ßÈ¿¾× 󸮽à °á±¸»óÃß¿¡ Èí¼öµÇ´Â ¿µ¾ç¼Ò ÇÔ·®Àº ´ëÁ¶±¸ÀÎ È­Çкñ¿ë½Ã¿ë±¸¿¡ ºñÇØ Áõ°¡µÇ´Â °æÇâÀ̾úÀ¸¸ç, µ·ºÐ´¢ ¹ßÈ¿¾× Èñ¼®±¸¿Í ºñ±³ÇÒ ¶§ À¯ÀǼºÀÖ´Â Â÷À̸¦ º¸¿©ÁÖÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. ½ÃÇèÀü Åä¾ç¿¡ ºñÇØ µ·ºÐ´¢ ¹ßÈ¿¾×¸¦ ó¸®ÇÑ ÈÄ pH, EC, Åä¾çÀÇ Áú¼Ò(NH$_4$-N, NO$_3$-N), Av. P$_2$O$_{5}$, Ex. Ca ¹× MgÇÔ·®Àº ¶Ñ·ÇÇÑ º¯È­°¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù. º» ½ÃÇè°á°ú µ·ºÐ´¢ ¹ßÈ¿¾×¿¡´Â ¸¹Àº ¾çÀÇ ºñ·á¼ººÐÀ» ÇÔÀ¯Çϰí ÀÖ¾î °ú´Ù ½Ã¿ë½Ã¿¡´Â ÀÛ¹°ÇÇÇØ´Â ¹°·Ð Åä¾çÀ̳ª ÁöÇϼö¸¦ ¿À¿°½Ãų ¼ö Àֱ⠶§¹®¿¡ °á±¸»óÃßÀÇ °æ¿ì °üºñÀç¹è½Ã 50¹è Èñ¼®ÇÏ¿© ½Ã¿ëÇϸé ÀÛ¹°»ýÀ°°ú ȯ°æ Ãø¸é¿¡¼­ ¸Å¿ì ¹Ù¶÷Á÷ÇÏ´Ù°í ÆÇ´ÜµÇ¾ú´Ù.
The growth of leaves in field-grown head lettuce(cv. Urake) was compared after conventional application of N-P-K fertilizer or after application of various dilutions of livestock waste solution. Plants treated with livestock waste solution diluted 25 times (Ef. 25) or 50 times (Ef. 50) had greater growth than that for any other treatment. The number of leaves was greater with Ef. 25 than that with other treatments, although the increase was not statistically significant. Total head yield increased by fertigation with livestock waste solution compared to yield resulting from conventional fertilization. Plant tissue weight was increased according to the increase in concentration of applied livestock waste solution. The soil chemical properties, pH, electrical conductivity, $NH_4^+-N$, NO$_3$-N, available P exchangeable Ca and Mg, all increased with the increased application of livestock waste solution. In conclusion, fertigation of the dilute livestock waste solution on the range of Ef. 25 to Ef. 50 could improve yield and quality in head lettuce.
 
Ű¿öµå
°á±¸»óÃß;µ·ºÐ´¢ ¹ßÈ¿¾×;°í·©Áö Åä¾çÀÌÈ­Çмº;head lettuce;livestock waste;highland;soil chemical properties;
 
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸÁö / v.14, no.1, 2001³â, pp.84-88
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-3591
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200111921402982)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿