¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ / v.14, no.2, 2001³â, pp.152-156
È­±âÁ¦°Å°¡ ¹éÃâ(Atractylodes macrocephala Koidz)ÀÇ »ýÀ° ¹× Á¤À¯ ÇÔ·®¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ
( Effects of flower removal on Growth and Content of essential oil in Atractylodes macrocephala Koidz )
±è¼ö¿ë;±Ç¿ÀÈç;Á¶ÁöÇü;ÀÓÀçÇÏ; °æ»óºÏµµ³ó¾÷±â¼ú¿ø ºÀÈ­°í³ÃÁö¾àÃʽÃÇèÀå;°æ»óºÏµµ³ó¾÷±â¼ú¿ø ºÀÈ­°í³ÃÁö¾àÃʽÃÇèÀå;°æ»óºÏµµ³ó¾÷±â¼ú¿ø ºÀÈ­°í³ÃÁö¾àÃʽÃÇèÀå;°æ»óºÏµµ³ó¾÷±â¼ú¿ø ºÀÈ­°í³ÃÁö¾àÃʽÃÇèÀå;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
ÃÖ±Ù Áß±¹¿¡¼­ µµÀÔµÇ¾î °æºÏ ºÏºÎÁö¹æÀ» Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î Àç¹è¸éÀûÀÌ È®´ëµÇ°í ÀÖ´Â ¹éÃâÀÇ Àç¹è±â¼úÈ®¸³ ½ÃÇèÀÇ ÀÏȯÀ¸·Î È­±âÁ¦°Å°¡ »ýÀ°°ú ¼ö·®¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» ±¸¸íÇϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© ½ÃÇè ¼öÇà ÇÑ °á°ú¸¦ ¿ä¾àÇÏ¸é ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. 1. ¹éÃâÀÇ È­±âÁ¦°Å¿¡ µû¸¥ Áö»óºÎ »ýÀ°Àº ¹«Á¦°Å¿¡ ºñÇØ È­±âÁ¦°Å¿¡¼­ ÃÊÀåÀº 1.7¡­2.5cmÁ¤µµ È­±â°¡ Á¦°ÅµÈ ¸¸Å­ ª¾ÒÀ¸¸ç ¿±ÀÇ Å©±â, °æ¼ö¿Í °æÁ÷°æÀº Â÷À̰¡ ¾ø¾úÀ¸³ª Áö»óºÎ »ýüÁßÀº 48¡­60% °¨¼ÒµÇ¾ú´Ù. 2. ¹éÃâÀÇ È­±âÁ¦°Å½Ã±âº° È­±â»ýüÁßÀº È­±âÁ¦°Å½Ã±â°¡ ´Ê¾îÁú¼ö·Ï ¹«°Å¿öÁ® °³È­Á÷ÈÄ¿¡´Â ÁÖ´ç 39gÀ¸·Î Áö»óºÎ »ý ü ÁßÀÇ 60%¸¦ Â÷Áö ÇÏ¿´´Ù. 3. È­±âÁ¦°Å¿¡ µû¸¥ ÁöÇϺΠ»ýÀ°Àº ¹«Á¦°Å¿¡ ºñÇØ È­·ÚÃâÇö±âÁ¦°Å(7¿ù 15ÀÏ)¿Í °³È­ÀüÁ¦°Å(8¿ù 20ÀÏ)¿¡¼­ ±Ù°æÀå, ±Ù°æÁ÷°æ µîÀÌ ÄÆÀ¸¸ç °Ç±Ù°æ¼ö·®µµ À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô Áõ¼öµÇ¾ú´Âµ¥ È­·ÚÃâÇö±âÁ¦°Å±¸´Â 290.5kg/10aÀ¸·Î ¹«Á¦°Å±¸º¸´Ù 40% Áõ¼öµÇ¾î °¡Àå ¸¹¾Ò´Ù. 4. Á¤À¯ÇÔ·®Àº ¹«Á¦°Å±¸ 0.71m1/50g¿¡ ºñÇØ È­·ÚÃâÇö±âÁ¦°Å´Â 12% °³È­Àü Á¦°Å´Â 9%Áõ°¡ÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸³ª °³È­ÈÄ Á¦°Å´Â Â÷À̰¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù.
This study was conducted to investigate the flower organ removal effect on Atractylodes macrocephala Koidz which was introduced from China. The results were summarized as follows; The plant height of Flower Organ Cutting(F.O.N.C.) treatment short by 1.7¡­2.5 cm compared to Flower Organ Non-Cutting(F.O.N.C.) treatment. But number of stem and stem diameter of F.0.C treatment were similar to that of F.O.N.C. treatment. The fresh weight of above-ground part of F.O.N.C. treatment was decreased 48¡­60% compare to F.O.C. treatments. The later was period of F.O.C., the higher was fresh weight of above-ground part. The growth of underground part was more F.O.C. at July 15 and Aug. 20 treatments than F.O.N.D treatment. The dry rhizome yield of F.O.C. at July 15 treatment was increased 40% compare to F.O.N.D treatment. Essential oil content of F.O.C. at July 15 treatment was increased 12% compare to F.O.N.D treatment.
 
Ű¿öµå
Atractylodes macrocephala Koidz;flower cutting;
 
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸÁö / v.14, no.2, 2001³â, pp.152-156
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-3591
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200111921403114)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿