¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ / v.20, no.2, 2007³â, pp.145-149
°ü¼ö¹æ¹ýº° ¾ÐÂøÁ¤µµ¿¡ µû¸¥ Äᳪ¹°ÀÇ »ýÀå°ú ÇüÅ º¯È­
( Growth and Shape of Soybean Sprouts as Affected by Culture Method and Their Pressing )
Àü½ÂÈ£;ÀÌâ¿ì;±èÈ«¿µ;Àüº´»ï;°­ÁøÈ£; °æ»ó´ëÇб³ ³ó¾÷»ý¸í°úÇдëÇÐ;°æ»ó´ëÇб³ ³ó¾÷»ý¸í°úÇдëÇÐ;°æ»ó´ëÇб³ ³ó¾÷»ý¸í°úÇдëÇÐ;°æ»ó´ëÇб³ ³ó¾÷»ý¸í°úÇдëÇÐ;°æ»ó´ëÇб³ »ý¸í°úÇבּ¸¿ø;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
Äᳪ¹°ÀÇ ÇüÅ´ »óǰ¼º¿¡ Ä¿´Ù¶õ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ£´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸´Â »ó¸é»ì¼ö ¹æ½Ä°ú Çϸé´ã¼ö ¹æ½Ä¿¡¼­ ¾ÐÂøÀÌ Äᳪ¹°ÀÇ »ýÀå°ú ÇüÅ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» Á¶»çÇϰíÀÚ »ó¸é»ì¼ö ¹æ½Ä¿¡¼­´Â »óÇÏ·Î Àç¹èÅëÀ» Æ÷°³¾î À̸¦ ¸ÅÀÏ ±³È¯Çϰųª, °è¼Ó ¾ÐÂøÇÏ´Â ¹æ¹ý°ú Çϸé´ã¼ö ¹æ½Ä¿¡¼­´Â 4ÀϺÎÅÍ ¾ÐÂøÀ» °¡Çϰųª °è¼Ó ¾ÐÂøÇÏ´Â ¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î 󸮸¦ °¡ÇÏ¿© ½ÃÇèÀ» ¼öÇàÇÏ¿´´ø ¹Ù ±× °á°ú¸¦ ¿ä¾àÇÏ¸é ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. 1. °³Ã¼´ç Çü¼ºµÈ ¼¼±Ù¼ö´Â »ó¸é»ì¼ö ¹× Çϸé´ã¼ö ¹æ½Ä ¸ðµÎ ¾ÐÂø °­µµ°¡ °­ÇÒ¼ö·Ï Àû¾ú´Ù. 2. »ó¸é»ì¼ö ¹æ½Ä¿¡¼­ ÇϹèÃàÀº °è¼Ó ¾ÐÂø½Ã °¡Àå ª¾Ò´ø ¹Ý¸é, »Ñ¸®´Â ¾ÐÂøÇÏÁö ¾Ê°Å³ª °è¼Ó ¾ÐÂø½Ã °¡Àå ±æ¾ú´Ù. Çϸé´ã¼ö ¹æ½Ä¿¡¼­´Â ÇϹèÃà ±æÀÌ¿¡¼­¸¸ ¹«¾ÐÂø¿¡¼­ °¡Àå ±æ°í °è¼Ó ¾ÐÂø½Ã °¡Àå ª¾Ò´Ù. 3. °ü¼ö¹æ½Ä¿¡ °ü°è¾øÀÌ ÀÚ¿± ¹Ù·Î ¾Æ·¡ÀÇ hook Á÷°æÀº ¾ÐÂø 󸮰£ Â÷À̰¡ ¾ø¾ú´ø ¹Ý¸é, ÇϹèÃà Áß°£ºÎºÐÀÇ Á÷°æÀº ¾ÐÂø°­µµ°¡ °­ÇÒ¼ö·Ï ±½¾îÁö´Â °æÇâÀ» º¸¿´´Ù. 4. »ý»ê¼öÀ²°ú °ü·ÃµÈ °³Ã¼´ç Àüü»ýüÁßÀº »ó¸é»ì¼ö ¹æ½Ä¿¡¼­´Â ¹«¾ÐÂø½Ã °¡Àå Àû¾úÀ¸¸ç, ¾ÐÂø °­µµ°¡ °­ÇÒ¼ö·Ï Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿© °è¼Ó ¾ÐÂø½Ã °¡Àå ¸¹¾Ò´Ù. ±×·¯³ª Çϸé´ã¼ö ¹æ½Ä¿¡¼­ Àüü»ýü ÁßÀº ¾ÐÂøÃ³¸®°£ Â÷À̰¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù.
Shape of soybean sprouts affects their marketability. This study was carried out to understand the effects of pressure in both overspraying and underwatering cultivation methods on growth and morphological characteristics of soybean sprouts. Pressing treatments were done by continuous pressing by laying a plastic culture box over another with growing the sprouts, their alteration every day, or no pressing in overspraying method, and by continuous pressing, pressing after the 4th day cultivation with 30 kg steel case, or no pressing in underwatering method. The soybean (cv. Junjery) seeds were soaked in 2 ppm BA solution for 5 hours and then aerated for 3 hours immediately before 6 day culture. Lateral roots, hypocotyl and root lengths, hypocotyl diameters, fresh and dry weights were measured. Lateral roots per sprout were decreased with stronger pressing regardless of watering methods. In overspraying method, continuous pressing treatment resulted in shortest hypocotyl, but no and ones did the longest root. In underwatering method, however, no pressing one showed the longest hypocotyl but continuous pressing did the shortest hypocotyl. Regardless of watering methods, middle part of hypocotyl was more thickened with stronger pressing although hook diameters of the 3 treatments were not affected. In overspraying method. total fresh weight per sprout was the least in no pressing but the greatest in continuous pressing. In underwatering method, however, there was no significant difference between the treatments.
 
Ű¿öµå
Soybean (Glycine max L.);Sprout;Pressing;Growth;Morphological characteristics;
 
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸÁö / v.20, no.2, 2007³â, pp.145-149
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-3591
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200717317909423)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿