¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ / v.8, no.2, 1995³â, pp.195-199
¿±¿Â ¹× ±¤°­µµ¿¡ µû¸¥ ´ëµÎǰÁ¾°£ÀÇ ±¤ÇÕ¼º´É·Â¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸
( Studies of photosynthesis rate on the leaf temperature and light intensity in Soybean Cultivars )
À±º´¼º; ;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
´ëµÎ(ÓÞÔç) ¼ö·®(â¥Õá)ÀÌ ¿ì¼öÇÑ ÀºÇÏ(ëÞùÁ), ¹æ»ç(Û¯ÞÒ), ÆÈ´Þ(ø¢Ó¹) Àç¹èǰÁ¾(î¨ÛÆù¡ðú)À» ±¤ÇÕ¼ºÈ°¼ºÆø»ç¼±(ÎÃùêà÷üÀàõøëÞÒàÊ) ((PAR) ¹üÀ§(ÛôêÌ)¿¡¼­ 5º»¿±±â(Üâç¨Ñ¢)($V_5$)¿¡ ¿±¿Â(ç¨è®)À» ´Þ¸®ÇÏ¿© ±¤ÇÕ¼º¼Óµµ(ÎÃùêà÷áÜÓø)¿Í È£Èí¼Óµµ(û¼ýåáÜÓø)ÀÇ º¯È­¸¦ ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿´°í, ǰÁ¾º°(ù¡ðúܬ) ¿±(ç¨)ÀÇ Æ¯¼ºÀÎ ºñ¿±Áß(Ýïç¨ñì)(SLW), ¿±³ì¼ÒÇÔ¾ç(ç¨ÒÑáÈùßåÖ)°ú ±¤ÇÕ¼º(ÎÃùêà÷)°úÀÇ °ü°è¸¦ Á¶»çÇÑ °á°ú(Ì¿Íý)´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. 1. $25^{circ}C$¿¡¼­ ¼ø±¤ÇÕ¼º¼Óµµ(âíÎÃùêà÷áÜÓø)(Net Photosynthesis)´Â ÀºÇÏ(ëÞùÁ) $21.5mgdm^{-2}h^{-1}$, ¹æ»ç(Û¯ÞÒ) $20.2mgdm^{-2}h^h{-1}$, ÆÈ´Þ(ø¢Ó¹) $18.5mgdm^{-2}h^{-1}$À̾ú´Ù. 2. ÀüǰÁ¾(îïù¡ðú) ¸ðµÎ ¿±¿Â(ç¨è®) $25^{circ}C$¿¡¼­ ±¤ÇÕ¼º¼Óµµ(ÎÃùêà÷áÜÓø)°¡ °¡Àå ³ô¾Ò°í ÀºÇÏ(ëÞùÁ) ǰÁ¾(ù¡ðú)ÀÌ ¿ì¼ö(éÐâ³)ÇßÀ¸¸ç, ¿±Çü(ç¨úþ)Àº ÀºÇÏ(ëÞùÁ) (Long) > ¹æ»ç(Û¯ÞÒ)(Oval) > ÆÈ´Þ(ø¢Ó¹)(Round) ¼ø¼­¿´´Ù. 3. ¿±(ç¨)ÀÇ È£Èí¿¬µµ(û¼ýåææÓø)´Â ÀºÇÏ(ëÞùÁ), ¹æ»ç(Û¯ÞÒ), ÆÈ´Þ(ø¢Ó¹)¿¡¼­ $15^{circ}$ $0.56mgdm^{-2}h^{-1}$, $20^{circ}C$ $0.79mgdm^{-2}h^{-1}$, $25^{circ}$ $1,15mgdm^{-2}h^{-1}$, $30^{circ}C$ $1.37mgdm^{-2}h^{-1}$¿´´Ù. 4. ºñ¿±Áß(Ýïç¨ñì)Àº ¹æ»ç(Û¯ÞÒ)°¡ $3.1mg/cm^2$À̾ú°í, ÀºÇÏ(ëÞùÁ)¿Í ÆÈ´Þ(ø¢Ó¹)Àº $3.5mg/cm^2$À̾úÀ¸¸ç ºñ¿±Áß(Ýïç¨ñì)°ú ±¤ÇÕ¼º(ÎÃùêà÷)°ú´Â À¯ÀǼº(êóëòàõ)ÀÌ ÀÎÁ¤µÇÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. 5. ¿±³ì¼Ò(ç¨ÒÑáÈ) ÇÔ·®(ùßÕá)Àº ÀºÇÏ(ëÞùÁ)°¡ $2.48{mu}g/gF.W.$À¸·Î °¡Àå ³ô¾Ò°í, ¹æ»ç(Û¯ÞÒ)°¡ $2.19{mu}g/gF.W.$À̾ú°í ÆÈ´Þ(ø¢Ó¹)ÀÌ $1.67{mu}g/gF.W.$·Î °¡Àå ³·¾ÒÀ¸¸ç ¿±·Ï¼Ò(ç¨ÖàáÈ) ÇÔ·®(ùßåÖ)°ú ±¤ÇÕ¼º(ÎÃùêà÷)°ú´Â À¯ÀǼº(êóëòàõ)ÀÌ ÀÎÁ¤µÇ¾ú´Ù. 6. ±¤º¸»óÁ¡(ÎÃÜÍßÁïÇ)Àº $15^{circ}C$¿¡¼­´Â $10{mu}Em^{-2}s^{-1}$·Î ¸ðµÎ °°¾ÒÀ¸³ª, $20^{circ}C$¿¡¼­ ÀºÇÏ(ëÞùÁ)´Â $12{mu}Em^{-2}s^{-1}$À̾ú°í, ¹æ»ç(Û¯ÞÒ)¿Í ÆÈ´Þ(ø¢Ó¹)Àº $13{mu}Em^{-2}s^{-1}$À̾ú´Ù. $25^{circ}C$¿¡¼­´Â ÀºÇÏ(ëÞùÁ)¿Í ¹æ»ç(Û¯ÞÒ)°¡ $16{mu}Em^{-2}s^{-1}$À̾úÁö¸¸ ÆÈ´ÞÀº $18{mu}$m^{-2}s^{-1}$À̾ú°í, $30^{circ}C$¿¡¼­´Â ÀºÇÏ(ëÞùÁ)¿Í ¹æ»ç(Û¯ÞÒ)°¡ $22{mu}Em^{-2}s^{-1}$À̾úÁö¸¸, ÆÈ´ÞÀº $23{mu}Em^{-2}s^{-1}$À̾ú´Ù.
This study was conducted to investigate the Net photosynthesis and respiration rates among the varieties of Soybean(Eunha, Pangsa and Paldal that have high yields) at various leaf temperature and light intensity at the stage of $V_5$. The relations between the Net photosynthesis rate and SLW(specific leaf weight) and chlorophyll content were also investigated. 1. Net photosynthesis rates at $25^{circ}C$ were $21.5mgdm^{-2}h^{-1}$ in cv. Eunha, $20.2mgdm^{-2}h^{-1}$ in cv. Pangsa and $18.5mgdm^{-2}h^{-1}$ in cv. Paldal. 2. Most cultivars of Soybean showed the maximum rates of Net photosynthesis at $25^{circ}C$, especially in cv. Eunha. Also Net photosynthesis rates differed depending on the leaf shape. Long leaf shape(cv. Eunha) was better than round leaf shape(cv. Paldal) in Net photosynthesis rate. 3. Respiration rates of leaves in Eunha, Pangse and Paldal were $0.56mgdm^{-2}h^{-1}$ at $15^{circ}C$, $0.79mgdm^{-2}h^{-1}$ at $20^{circ}C$ $1.15mgdm^{-2}h^{-1}$ at $25^{circ}C$ and $1.37mgdm^{-2}h^{-1}$ at $30^{circ}C$. 4. Specific leaf weight were $3.1mg/cm^2$ in Pangsa, $3.5mg/cm^2$ in Eunha and Paldal. No signlficant difference were showed in net photosynthesis rates and specific lear weight. 5. Leaf chlorophyll content were $2.48{mu}g/gF.W.$ in Eunha, $2.19{mu}g/gF.W.$ in Pangsa and $1.67{mu}/g F.W.$ in Paldal. Significant difference were showed in Net photosynthesis rates and Leaf chlorophyll content. 6. The estimated compensation points at which net photosynthesis approached zero were $10{mu}Em^{-2}s^{-1}$ in Eunha, Pangsa, and Palda at 1$5^{circ}C$. The compensation point in cv. Eunha at $20^{circ}C$ was $12P{mu}Em^{-2}s{-1}$ while $13{mu}Em^{-2}s{-1}$ in Pangsa and Palda. The compensation point in cv. Paldal at $25^{circ}C$ was $18{mu}Em^{-2}s{-1}$ while $16{mu}Em^{-2}s{-1}$ in Eunha and Pangsa. The compensation point in cv. Palda at $30^{circ}C$ was $23{mu}Em^{-2}s{-1}$ Palda while $13{mu}Em^{-2}s{-1}$ in Eunha and Pangsa.
 
Ű¿öµå
Chlorophyll content;Compensation point;Net photosynthesis;Respiration rate;Specific leat weight;
 
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸÁö / v.8, no.2, 1995³â, pp.195-199
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-3591
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO199511920278061)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿