¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ / v.8, no.2, 1995³â, pp.209-215
¹é°¡¼öµµÀÇ Àç½Ä¹Ðµµ¿¡ µû¸¥ »ýÀ° ¹× ¼ö·®
( Effect of Planting Density on Growth and Yield in Cyanachum wilfordii )
ÃÖÀνÄ; ;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
ÁߺÎ(ñéÝ») ³»·úÁö¹æ(Ò®×Áò¢Û°)¿¡¼­ ¹éÇϼö¿À(ÛÜù¼âÏè¡) Àç¹è½Ã(î¨ÛÆãÁ) ÀûÁ¤(îêïá) Àç½Ä¹Ðµµ(î¨ãÕÚËÓø)¸¦ ±¸¸í(ϼ٥)ÇϰíÀÚ ÃæºÏ(õ÷ÝÁ) Áö¹æ(ò¢Û°) Àç·¡Á¾(î¤Ò­ðú)À» °ø½Ã(ÍêãË)ÇÏ¿© 10a´ç(Ó×) ½Ãºñ(ã¿Ýþ)´Â ¿õºñ(ã¿Ýþ) 1,000kg, N-P-K=8-4-4kgÀ» Àü·®(îïåÖ) ±âºñ(ÐñÝþ)·Î ½Ã¿ë(ã¿éÄ)ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ó¸®(ô¥×â)´Â ÈÞÆø(ýÏøë)À» ÁÖ±¸(ÁÖ±¸)·Î, ÁÖ°£(ñ»Êà)À» ¼¼±¸(á¬Ï¡)·Î ÇÏ¿©, ÈÞÆø(ýÏøë)Àº 40, 50, 60cm, ÁÖ°£(ñ»Êà)Àº 10, 15, 20cm·Î ÇÏ¿© ºÐ·ù±¸¹èÄ¡(ÝÂױϡÛÕöÇ) 3¹Ýº¹(ÚãÝ¥)À¸·Î ½ÃÇè(ãËúÐ)À» ¼öÇà(âÄú¼)ÇÏ¿´´ø °á°ú(Ì¿Íý)¸¦ ¿ä¾à(é©å³)ÇÏ¸é ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. 1. ÃâÇö±â(õóúÞÑ¢)´Â 5¿ù(êÅ) 25ÀÏ(ìí)·Î 󸮰£(ô¥×âÊà)¿¡ Â÷À̰¡ ¾øÀÌ ±ÕÀÏ(гìé)ÇÏ¿´´Ù. 2. À§Àå(ê×íþ)Àº ÈÞÆø°£(ýÏøëÊà)¿¡¼­ 40cm´Â 219cm, 50cm´Â 220cm, 60cm´Â 225cm ¿´À¸³ª, ÁÖ°£(ñ»Êà)¿¡´Â 10cm¿¡¼­ 225cm, 15cm´Â 219cm, 20cm´Â 218cm·Î ÁÖ°£(ñ»Êà)ÀÌ Á¼À»¼ö·Ï ±æ¾úÀ¸¸ç, ¿±¼ö(ç¨â¦)´Â ¾çÀå(å×íþ)°ú °°Àº °æÇâ(ÌËú¾)À¸·Î, ÁÖ°£(ñ»Êà)ÀÌ Á¼À¸¸é ¿±¼ö(ç¨â¦)´Â Áõ°¡(ñòÊ¥)µÇ¾ú´Ù. 3. ±ÙÀå(ÐÆíþ)Àº ÈÞÆø(ýÏøë) 40cm¿¡¼­ 24.5cm, 50cm´Â 24.6cm, 60cm´Â 24.2cm·Î Å« Â÷À̰¡ ¾øÀ¸³ª, ÁÖ°£(ñ»Êà) 10cm¿¡¼­ 23.5cm, 24.4cm, 20cm´Â 24.9cm·Î, ÁÖ°£(ñ»Êà)ÀÌ ³ÐÀ»¼ö·Ï $0.9sim1.4cm$°¡ ±æ¾úÀ¸¸ç, ±Ù¼ö(ÐÆâ¦)´Â $1.2siml.4$ °³(ËÁ)·Î 󸮰£(ô¥×âÊà)¿¡ Å« Â÷À̰¡ ¾ø´Â °æÇâ(ÌËú¾)À̾ú´Ù. 4, 10a´ç(Ó×) ¼ö¾ç(â¥åÖ)Àº ÈÞÆø(ýÏøë) 40cmÀÇ 395kg/10a¿¡ ºñ(Ýï)ÇÏ¿© 50cm´Â 11%, 60cm´Â 4%°¡ °¢°¢(ÊÀÊÀ) Áõ¼ö(ñòâ¥)µÇ¾úÀ¸³ª, ÁÖ°£(ñ»Êà) 10cmÀÇ 495kg/10a¿¡ ºñ(Ýï)ÇÏ¿©, 15cm´Â 17%, 20cm´Â 32%°¡ °¢°¢(ÊÀÊÀ) °¨¼ö(Êõâ¥)µÇ¾î, ÁߺÎ(ñéÝ») ³»·úÁö¹æ(Ò®×Áò¢Û°)¿¡¼­ ¹éÇϼö¿À(ÛÜù¼âÏè¡) Àç¹è½Ã(î¨ÛÆãÁ) Àç½Ä¹Ðµµ(î¨ãÕÚËÓø)´Â ÈÞÆø(ýÏøë) 50cm, ÁÖ°£(ñ»Êà) l0cm·Î Àç¹è(î¨ÛÆ)ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ È¿°úÀû(üùÍýîÜ)À̾ú´Ù.
This experiment was carried out to elucidate the effect of row width and hill space on growth and yield in cynanchum wilfordii on experimental fields of chungbuk Provincial Rural Development Administration. Emergence date was May 25 and had no differences between planting density. Vine length was 219cm with row 40cm, 220cm, with 50cm and 225cm with 60cm, and in hill spaces, it was 225cm with hill space 10cm, 219cm with 15cm, and 218cm with 20cm. No. of leaves was same tendencies to vine length and was more increased as the hill space was narrower. Root length was longer about 0.9cm to 1.4cm as the hill space was wider, and no. of root had no difference between planting tensity. Yield was more increased row width was wider and was decreased hill space was wider. And the profitalble planting density was row width 50cm and hill space 10cm in the cultivation cynanchum wilfordii.
 
Ű¿öµå
cynanchum wilfordu;Planting density;Growth;Yield;
 
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸÁö / v.8, no.2, 1995³â, pp.209-215
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-3591
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO199511920278076)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿