¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ / v.19, no.1, 2006³â, pp.180-188
»êÀÚ°í ÀÚ»ýÁöÀÇ »ýÀ°Æ¯¼º ¹× Åä¾ç¿äÀΰ£ »ó°ü¸ðÇü
( Correlation Model between Growth Characteristics and Soil Factors of Tulipa edulis Habitat )
À¯ÁÖÇÑ;Á¤¼º°ü;ÀÌöÈñ; ÃæÃ»ºÏµµ¼ö¸ñ.»ê¾ßÃÊ¿¬±¸¼¾ÅÍ;°æºÏ´ëÇб³ Á¶°æÇаú;ÃæºÏ´ëÇб³ ¿ø¿¹Çаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸´Â ¾à¿ë ¹× °ü»ó¿ë ÀÚ¿øÀ¸·Î½á ±â´ëµÇ´Â »êÀÚ°íÀÇ ÀÚ»ýÁö ȯ°æÀ» ü°èÀûÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿© Àç¹è¹ý ¹× »ýÅÂÀû Ư¼º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ±âÃÊÀÚ·á Á¦°øÀ» À§ÇØ ¼öÇàµÇ¾ú´Ù. ÀÚ»ýÁö ȯ°æÀº ÇØ¹ß 245 m, ¹æÀ§´Â ³²Çâ, ÀÚ»ýÁö ¸éÀûÀº¾à $49;m^2$À̰í, °ÇÁ¶ÇÑ ¾çÁö¿¡¼­ ÀÚ»ýÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾ú´Ù. °ü¼Ó½Ä¹°»óÀº 28°ú 59¼Ó 50Á¾ 11º¯Á¾ 1ǰÁ¾ µî ÃÑ 62ºÐ·ù±ºÀÌ È®ÀεǾú°í ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°»óÀº °ü»ó¿ë 23Á¾(37.1%), ½Ä¿ë 43Á¾(69.4%), ¾à¿ë 34Á¾(54.8%), ±âŸ¿ë 29Á¾(46.8%)À¸·Î ºÐ·ùµÇ¾ú´Ù. Åä¾ç¿äÀÎ ºÐ¼®°á°ú, »êµµ´Â pH 4.9, À¯±â¹°ÇÔ·® 4.8%, À¯È¿Àλê 3.6 mg/kg, ġȯ¼º Ä®·ý $0.5;cmol^{+}/kg$, ġȯ¼º Ä®½· $3.0;cmol^{+}/kg$, ġȯ¼º ¸¶±×³×½· $0.8;cmol^{+}/kg$, ¾çÀÌ¿Âġȯ¿ë·® $12.3;cmol^{+}/kg$, Àü±âÀüµµµµ 0.3 dS/m·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. È­ÇÐÀû Ư¼º°£ »ó°üºÐ¼®°á°ú, ġȯ¼º Ä®½·°ú ¾çÀÌ¿Âġȯ¿ë·®ÀÌ ³ôÀº »ó°ü¼ºÀ» º¸¿´´Ù. »êÀÚ°íÀÇ »ýÀ°Æ¯¼ºÀº ÃÊÀå 7.6cm, ¿±Æø 0.6 cm, ¿±Àå 12.7cm, È­Æø 2.8 cm, È­°æÀå 5.4 cm, ¿±·Ï¼Ò·®Àº $34.7;{mu}g;mg^{-1}$·Î Á¶»çµÇ¾ú´Ù. »ýÀ°Æ¯¼º°£ »ó°üºÐ¼® °á°ú, ÃÊÀå°ú È­°æÀåÀÌ ³ôÀº »ó°ü¼ºÀ» º¸¿´´Ù. Åä¾ç¿äÀΰú »ýÀ°Æ¯¼º°£ »ó°ü¼º ºÐ¼®°á°ú, ġȯ¼º Ä®·ý°ú ¿±ÀåÀÌ ³ôÀº »ó°ü¼ºÀ¸·Î º¸¿´À¸³ª À̵éÀÇ °ü°è´Â ºÎÀû »ó°ü¼ºÀ¸·Î È®ÀεǾú´Ù. »ýÀ°¸ðÇü ºÐ¼® °á°ú, ¿±Æø°ú ġȯ¼º Ä®·ýÀÇ ¼³¸í·ÂÀº ¾à 86.4%, ¿±·Ï¼Ò·®°ú ġȯ¼º Ä®·ýÀº ¾à 83.7%¿´´Ù.
This study was carried out to offer the raw data on the method of cultivation and ecological characteristic by systematical analysing habitat environment of Tulipa edulis that was expected as medicinal and ornamental resource. The habitat environment was that the altitude was 245 m, the aspect of south, the size of approximately $49;m^2$, and there was analyzed that Tulipa edulis grew wild in the dryly sunny spot. The vascular plants were summarized as 62 taxa; 28 families, 59 genera, 50 species, 11 varieties and 1 forms, and the resource plants were classified that there were 23 taxa of ornamental plants(37.1%), 43 taxa of edible plants(69.4%), 34 taxa of medicinal plants(54.8%) and 29 taxa of others(46.8%). In the results of soil factors analysis, there showed that acidity was pH 4.9, organic matter content of 4.9%, available $P_{2}O_{5}$ of 3.6 mg/kg, exchangeable $K^+$ of $0.5;cmol^{+}/kg$, exchangeable $Ca^{2+}$ of $3.0;cmol^{+}/kg$, exchangeable $Mg^{2+}$ of $0.8;cmol^{+}/kg$, cation exchange capacity(C.E.C) of $12.3;cmol^{+}/kg$ and electrical conductivity(EC) of 0.3 dS/m. In the results of correlation analysis between soil factors, exchangeable $Ca^{2+}$ and C.E.C were highly correlative. The growth characteristics of Tulipa edulis were surveyed that height was 7.6 cm, leaf width of 0.6 cm, leaf length of 12.7 cm, flower width of 2.8 cm, peduncle of 5.4 cm and chlorophyll of $34.7;{mu}g;mg^{-1}$. In the results of correlation analysis between growth characteristics, height and peduncle were highly correlative. In the results of correlation analysis between soil factors and growth characteristics, exchangeable $K^{+}$ and leaf length were high relativity but they were confirmed negative relation. In the results of growth model analysis, R-square of leaf width and exchangeable $K^{+}$ was some 86.4% and that of chlorophyll and exchangeable $K^{+}$ was some 83.7%.
 
Ű¿öµå
Model;Habitat;Soil;Growth;
 
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸÁö / v.19, no.1, 2006³â, pp.180-188
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-3591
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200617033413098)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿