¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ / v.19, no.1, 2006³â, pp.105-111
´Ùº¯·® ºÐ¼®¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ±¹³»»ê ´ëÃß³ª¹« ǰÁ¾ÀÇ ÇüÅÂÀû Ư¼º°ú À¯¿¬°ü°è
( Morphological Characteristics and Classification of Zizyphus Cultivars in Korea by Multivariative Analysis )
À̹®È£;Ȳ¼®ÀÎ;Àå¿ë¼®; ±¹¸³»ê¸²°úÇпø Ư¿ë¼ö°ú;±¹¸³»ê¸²°úÇпø Ư¿ë¼ö°ú;±¹¸³»ê¸²°úÇпø Ư¿ë¼ö°ú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
´ëÃß³ª¹«¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸ ¹× 2008³âºÎÅÍ ½ÃÇàµÉ »ê¸²¼öÁ¾ÀÇ Ç°Á¾º¸È£Á¦µµ¿¡ ´ëºñÇÏ¿© ´ëÃß³ª¹«ÀÇ Æ¯¼ºÁ¶»ç¿ä·É°ËÁ¤Áöħ¼­(TG : Test guidelines) ÀÛ¼º µî¿¡ Ȱ¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ±âÃÊÀڷḦ Á¦°øÇϰíÀÚ ¿ì¸®³ª¶ó¿¡¼­ °¡Àå ¸¹ÀÌ Àç¹èµÇ°í ÀÖ´Â ´ëÃß³ª¹« º¹Á¶ µî 5ǰÁ¾À» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î °ú½Ç°ú ¿±ÀÇ ÇüÅÂÀû Ư¼ºµéÀ» Á¶»ç, ÁÖ¼ººÐºÐ¼® ¹× ±ºÁýºÐ¼® µî°ú °°Àº ´Ùº¯·® ºÐ¼®¹ýÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ºÐ¼® °íÂûÇÑ °á°ú, ÀÎ(ìÒ)°ú °ü·ÃµÈ Ư¼º¿¡¼­´Â À¯ÀǼºÀÌ ÀÎÁ¤µÇÁö ¾Ê¾Æ ´ëÃß³ª¹«ÀÇ Ç°Á¾°£ À¯¿¬°ü°è¸¦ °íÂûÇϴ Ư¼ºÀ¸·Î´Â ºÎÀûÀý ÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÈ´Ù. °ú½ÇÁß·®À» ºñ·ÔÇÑ ¸ðµç Ư¼ºµé¿¡¼­ º¸Àº´ëÃß Ç°Á¾ÀÌ º¹Á¶¸¦ ºñ·ÔÇÑ ´Ù¸¥ 4ǰÁ¾°ú´Â ÇüÅÂÀû Ư¼º¿¡¼­ ¸íÈ®ÇÏ°Ô ±¸ºÐµÇ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ÁÖ¼ººÐºÐ¼® °á°ú, Á¦1ÁÖ¼ººÐÀÇ °íÀ¯°ªÀº 10.45·Î Àüü ºÐ»ê¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© 65.3%ÀÇ ±â¿©µµ°¡ ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, °íÀ¯ °ªÀÌ 1ÀÌ»óÀÎ Á¦3ÁÖ¼ººÐ±îÁöÀÇ Àüü ºÐ»ê¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ±â¿©µµ´Â 96.5%·Î ¸Å¿ì ³ôÀº °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ƯÈ÷, °ú½ÇÁ¾°æÀ» ºñ·ÔÇÏ¿© ¿±Àå°ú ¿±º´Àå ¹× Á¤¿±Àå°ú Á¤¿±Æø, °úÇüÁö¼ö¿Í ÇÙÇüÁö¼ö ¹× Á¤¿±ÇüÁö¼ö¿Í °°Àº ÇüÅÂÀû Ư¼ºµéÀÌ ´ëÃß³ª¹« ǰÁ¾ÀÇ À¯¿¬°ü°è¸¦ ±¸¸íÇϴµ¥ ³ôÀº ±â¿©µµ¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾ú´Ù. ±ºÁýºÐ¼® °á°ú, °Å¸®¼öÁØ 3.3À» ±âÁØÀ¸·Î º¸Àº´ëÃ߸¦ Á¦¿ÜÇÑ ¹«µî°ú ¿ùÃâ ¹× ±Ý¼º°ú º¹Á¶Ç°Á¾ÀÌ Æ÷ÇÔµÈ I group°ú º¸Àº´ëÃß Ç°Á¾¸¸ÀÌ Æ÷ÇÔµÈ II groupµî Å©°Ô 2°³ÀÇ groupÀ¸·Î ±¸ºÐÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾úÀ¸¸ç I groupÀº ¹«µî°ú ¿ùÃâ ¹× º¹Á¶Ç°Á¾ÀÌ Æ÷ÇÔµÈ sub group°ú ±Ý¼º ǰÁ¾ µî 2°³ÀÇ sub groupÀ¸·Î ´Ù½Ã ±¸ºÐÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù.
The objectives of this study, an analysis of fruit and leaf morphological characteristics among the five Zizyphus cultivars could be used for the investigation of cultivars classification and could provide information to make out the UPOV TG(Test Guidelines). ANOVA tests showed that there were statistically significant differences in all fruit and leaf morphological characteristics among the five Zizyphus cultivars at 1% level. But, for kernel characteristics, differences were statistically non-significant among the cultivars. Approximately, the Wolchul and Boeun cultivars showed larger and smaller values in overall characteristics and cultivars, respectively. The results of principal component analysis(PCA) for the fruit and leaf morphological characteristics showed that the first for principal components(PC's) explained about 65.3% of the total variation. The first PC was correlated with those characteristics that were mainly related to the terminal leaf length(TLL), leaf length(LL), fruit length(FL), terminal leaf width(TLW), and leaf petiole length(LPL). The second and third PC was mainly correlated with the terminal leaf morphological index(TLMI). Therefore, these characteristics were important to analysis of the fruit and leaf morphological characteristics and classification among the five Zizyphus cultivars. Cluster analysis using UPGMA method based on principal components showed that five Zizyphus cultivars could be clustered into two groups. Group I comprises Mudung, Wolchul, and Bokjo and Geumsung cultivars, Group II is Boeun cultivar. These results well similar to that of principal component analysis.
 
Ű¿öµå
Zizyphus;Morphological characteristics;Classification;Multivariative analysis;
 
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸÁö / v.19, no.1, 2006³â, pp.105-111
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-3591
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200617033412659)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿