|
|
|
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ / v.1, no.1, 1988³â, pp.42-47
|
±¸±âÀÚ Àü±âÁ¤µµ°¡ ǰÁú ¹× ¼ö·®¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ
( Effect of Quality and Yield to Different Purning Degree in Lycium Chinense Miller ) |
| ÀÌ»ó·¡; ;
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
| ÃÊ ·Ï |
| »ý¾à½Ä¹°·Î¼ Áß¾àÇÑ À§Ä¡¸¦ Á¡Çϰí ÀÖ´Â ±¸±âÀÚÀÇ ÀüÁöÁ¤µµ¿¡ µû¸¥ ǰÁú ¹× ¼ö·®¹ÝÀÀÀ» ±¸¸íÇϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© 1982 ~ '83³â 2°³³â¿¡ °ÉÃÄ "ÁøµµÀç·¡"¸¦ °ø½Ã½ÃÇèÇÑ °á°ú´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. 1. ±¸±âÀÚÀÇ °³È¹ÝÀÀÀº ¸Í¸ð - Ȳ¿± - ³«¿± - °³ÈÀÇ ÀÏ·ÃÀÇ ´Ü°è¸¦ °ÅÃÄ °³ÈµÇ¾ú°í, 2. ¹«ÀüÁö±¸¿¡ ºñÇØ ÀüÁö±¸°¡ °£ÀåÀÌ ±æ°í ±×¿¡ µû¸¥ Àý¼öµµ ¸¹¾ÒÀ¸¸ç ÃÑ À¯È¿ºÐÁö¼ö°¡ ¸¹¾Æ ¼ö·®¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ÁÖ¾ú´Ù. 3. ¹«ÀüÁö±¸¿¡¼´Â °úÁ¤ÀÌ Âª¾Æ °ú½ÇÀÌ Àß°í ÀüÁö±¸´Â °úÁ¤ÀÌ ±æ°í ±½Àº Ãæ½ÇÇÑ °ú½ÇÀÌ »ý»êµÇ¾î »óǰ°¡Ä¡°¡ ³ô¾Ò´Ù. 4. 10 a ´ç ¼ö·®Àº ¹«ÀüÁö ¹æÄ¡±¸(76kg)¿¡ ºñÇÏ¿© ÁöÇ¥¸é ÀüÁö±¸¿Í ÁöÇ¥¸é 10 cm ÀüÁö±¸¿¡¼ 38 ~ 39%ÀÇ Áõ¼öÈ¿°ú°¡ ÀÖ¾î ±¸±âÀÚ´Â ¸ð³â ¹«ÀüÇÏ¿© Àç¹èÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ ¹Ù¶÷Á÷ÇÏ´Ù°í »ç·áµÈ´Ù. 5. ±¸±âÀÚ ¼öȮȸ¼öº° ¼ö·®Àº 2ȸ ¼öÈ®À¸·Î »ý»ê·®ÀÇ 85%¸¦ ¼öÈ®ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾î ¼öÇгë·Â Àý°¨ÀÌ ¾ÕÀ¸·ÎÀÇ °úÁ¦¶ó ÇϰڴÙ. |
|
| The florescence steps of Lycium chinense M. are as follows: Budding-Yellow, leaf-Falling-Flowering. Pruning treatment has a long stem diameter compared withnon-pruning treatment and as a result, the numbers of internode were great and thetotal effective numbers of branch were great, too. In the non-pruning treatment asthe fruit length was short so the fruit was small, and on the contrary in the pruningtreatment as the fruit length was long so large and good fruits were produced.Fresh fruit weight produced per 10a was increased as much as 38-39% in thesurface pruning treatment and in the pruning treatment l0Cm away from surfacecompared with in the non-pruning treatmerlt. |
| |
| Ű¿öµå |
|
| |
|
|
 |
|
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸÁö / v.1, no.1, 1988³â, pp.42-47
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-3591
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO198811920277227)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î |
|
| ³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|
|