¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ / v.22, no.1, 2009³â, pp.31-36
Çѱ¹»ê °¡¹®ºñ³ª¹« ÀÚ»ýÁý´ÜÀÇ Ä§¿±Æ¯¼º º¯ÀÌ
( The Variation of Needle Characteristics of Picea jezoensis(Siebold & Zucc.) Carriere Populations in Korea )
¼ÛÁ¤È£;Ç㼺µÎ;°­±Ô¼®;¾çº´ÈÆ;ÀÌÁ¤ÁÖ; ±¹¸³»ê¸²°úÇпø »ê¸²À¯ÀüÀÚ¿øºÎ;±¹¸³»ê¸²°úÇпø »ê¸²À¯ÀüÀÚ¿øºÎ;±¹¸³»ê¸²°úÇпø »ê¸²À¯ÀüÀÚ¿øºÎ;±¹¸³»ê¸²°úÇпø »ê¸²À¯ÀüÀÚ¿øºÎ;±¹¸³»ê¸²°úÇпø »ê¸²À¯ÀüÀÚ¿øºÎ;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
°¡¹®ºñ³ª¹«ÀÇ À¯ÀüÀÚ¿ø º¸Á¸ Àü·« ¼ö¸³À» À§ÇØ 3°³ Áý´ÜÀÇ Áö¸®Àû À§Ä¡¿¡ µû¸¥ ħ¿±ÀÇ 7°¡Áö ÇüÅÂÀû Ư¼º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ º¯À̸¦ Á¶»çÇÏ°í ´Ùº¯·®ºÐ¼®À» ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. ħ¿±ÀÇ Æò±Õ»ýÀåÀº ħ¿±±æÀÌ 15.11 mm, ħ¿±Æø 1.43 mm, ħ¿±µÎ²² 0.42mm, ħ¿±±æÀÌ/Æø 10.9, ħ¿±Æø/µÎ²² 3.6, À¯°ü¼Ó°ú ¼öÁö±¸¿ÍÀÇ °Å¸® 0.47, ±â°ø¿­¼ö 17.4°³·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. Nested ºÐ»êºÐ¼® °á°ú À¯°ü¼Ó°ú ¼öÁö±¸¿ÍÀÇ °Å¸® Ư¼ºÀ» Á¦¿ÜÇÑ 6°¡Áö ¾çÀûƯ¼ºµé¿¡¼­ Áý´Ü°£ ¹× Áý´Ü ³» °³Ã¼ °£¿¡ À¯ÀÇÀûÀÎ Â÷À̸¦ º¸¿´À¸¸ç, ´ëºÎºÐÀÇ ÇüÁúµéÀº ÃÑ ºÐ»ê °¡¿îµ¥ Áý´Ü ³» °³Ã¼ °£ º¸´Ù´Â Áý´Ü°£ Â÷ÁöÇÏ´Â ºñÀ²ÀÌ Å« °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. 7°¡Áö ¾çÀûƯ¼ºµé¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Áý´Ü°£ À¯¿¬°ü°è´Â °Å¸®Áö¼ö 0.4¿¡¼­ °è¹æ»êÁý´ÜÀÌ Áö¸®»ê°ú ´öÀ¯»êÁý´Ü°ú´Â º°°³ÀÇ »óÀÌÇÑ ±×·ìÀ» Çü¼ºÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, À¯Áý±ºÀÇ À¯ÇüÀº Á¦2ÁÖ¼ººÐ±îÁö°¡ Àüü º¯ÀÌÀÇ 100%¸¦ ¼³¸íÇÏ¿´´Ù.
The aim of this study was to examine geographic variation to support a genetic resource conservation plan of rare endemic Picea jezoensis (Siebold & Zucc.) Carriere. Three populations of P. jezoensis were analysed using multivariate analysis for 7 characteristics of needle morphology. In the morphological characters, seven characters of needle were 15.11 mm (needle length), 1.43 mm (needle width), 0.42 mm (needle thickness), 10.9 (length / width of needle), 3.6 (width / thickness of needle), 0.47 mm (Distance between resin duct and vascular), 17.4 ea. (number of stomata row), respectively. Nested analysis showed that were statistically significant differences among populations as well as among individuals within populations in 6 quantitative characters. In 5 of 7 characters, variance components among populations were higher than those among individuals within populations. Cluster analysis using complete linkage method showed two groups (Mt. Gyebang populations was genetically distinct from the other two populations) to Euclidean distance 0.4. Among principal components, primary 2 principal components appeared to be major variables because of the loading contribution of 100%.
 
Ű¿öµå
Picea jezoensis;needle;multivariate analysis;conservation;
 
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸÁö / v.22, no.1, 2009³â, pp.31-36
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-3591
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200908349654090)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿