¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ / v.13, no.1, 2000³â, pp.80-88
ÀÚ»ýÁöº° ±Ý°­ÃÊ·Õ²ÉÀÇ ¿ÜºÎÇüÅ ¹× ¼ö¸®ºÐ·ù
( External Morphology and Numerical Taxonomy of Hanabusaya asiatica Populations in Different Habitats )
À¯±â¾ï;ÀÌ¿ìö;·ù½Â¿­; °­¿ø´ëÇб³ ÀÚ¿¬°úÇдëÇÐ »ý¹°Çаú;°­¿ø´ëÇб³ ÀÚ¿¬°úÇдëÇÐ »ý¹°Çаú;°í³ÃÁö³ó¾÷½ÃÇèÀå;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
±Ý°­ÃÊ·Õ²É ÀÚ»ýÁö 6Áö¿ª(¿À´ë»ê, Çâ·ÎºÀ, ´ë¾Ï»ê, È­¾Ç»ê, Á¡ºÀ»ê, ¼³¾Ç»ê)¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÇüÅÂÀû À¯¿¬°ü°è¸¦ ¾Ë¾Æº¸±â À§ÇÏ¿© ¿ÜºÎÇüÅÂ, ÁÖ¼ººÐºÐ¼®°ú À¯ÁýºÐ¼® µî ¼ö¸®ºÐ·ùÇÐÀû ¿¬±¸¸¦ ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¿¬±¸ °á°ú, ¿ÜºÎÇüÅÂÇüÁú Áß ÀÚ»ýÁö°£¿¡ ¶Ñ·ÇÇÑ Â÷À̸¦ º¸ÀÌ´Â ÇüÁúÀº ¾ø¾úÀ¸¸ç ÇüÁúÀÇ ¿¬¼Ó¼ºÀÌ ÀÎÁ¤µÇ¾ú´Ù. Á¶»çµÈ 6°³ ÀÚ»ýÁöÀÇ 71°³Ã¼¿Í outgroupÀ¸·Î »ç¿ëÇÑ °Ë»êÃÊ·Õ²É 7°³Ã¼, ÃÑ78°³Ã¼ Áß Çâ·ÎºÀ°ú ¼³¾Ç»ê Á¤»óºÎ¿¡¼­ ÀÚ¶ó´Â ÀϺΠ°³Ã¼µéÀº ÀÙ, Æ÷¿±ÀÇ ÇüÅ µî ¿¡¼­ ´Ù¼Ò Â÷À̸¦ º¸¿© ±¸º°ÀÌ °¡´ÉÇÏ¿´´Ù. OutgroupÀ¸·Î »ç¿ëµÈ °Ë»êÃÊ·Õ²ÉÀº ²É¹ÞħÀÇ ÇüŰ¡ ³ÐÀº ³­Çü À¸·Î ¼±Çü ¶Ç´Â ¼±»óÇÇħÇüÀÎ ±Ý°­Ãʷղɰú ±¸º°µÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç ³ª¸ÓÁö ÇüÁúµéÀº ºñ½ÁÇÑ °æÇâÀ» º¸¿´´Ù. 17°¡ÁöÀÇ ¾çÀû ÇüÁúÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ÁÖ¼ººÐºÐ¼® °á°ú ÁÖ¼ººÐ1(22.3%), ÁÖ¼ººÐ2(15.7%), ÁÖ¼ººÐ3(12.0%)ÀÌ ÃÑ 50.07%ÀÇ ±â¿©À²À» º¸¿´À¸¸ç, ÁÖ¼ººÐ 1°ú 2¸¦ ÀÌÂ÷¿ø°ø°£¿¡ µµ½ÃÇÑ °á°ú 6°³ ÀÚ»ýÁö Áý´ÜÀº ¼­·Î Áߺ¹µÇ¾î ³ªÅ¸³ª ±¸º°ÀÌ ºÒ°¡´ÉÇÏ¿´´Ù. Æò±Õ¿¬°á¹æ¹ý°ú Ward's¹ý ¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ À¯ÁýºÐ¼® °á°úµµ ÁÖ¼ººÐºÐ¼®°ú ¸Å¿ì À¯»çÇÑ °á°ú¸¦ º¸¿© À¯ÁýÀÌ ºÒ°¡´ÉÇÏ¿´´Ù.
External morphology and numerical taxonomy by principal component analysis and cluster analysis were investigated to understand the taxonomic relationships on the populations of Hanabusaya asiatica from 6 different habitats. Additionally H. latisepala was used as a outgroup. The distinct characters to each habitat were not present in the measurement of 21 qualitative characters except for some native individuals in the top of Mt. Sorak and Hyangrobong based on leaf shape and bracts. This results were recognized as the continuous variations of external morphology. The populations of H. latisepala and H. asiatica were identified by calyx lobe shape. The results obtained based on the principal component(PC) analysis of treated 78 OTU were divided into two groups by PC 1,2,3, and the sums of contributions for the total variance were 50.07% (PC1 22.3% , PC2 15.7%, PC3 12.0%, respectively), and six populations were not distinctly identified as illustrated in two dimensions with PC1 and PC2. In cluster analysis based on average linkage cluster analysis and Ward's method, there were similarities in the composition of clustered taxa, and each populations were not identified.
 
Ű¿öµå
external morphology;principal component analysis;cluster analysis;numerical taxonomy;Hanabusaya asiatica;habitat;population;
 
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸÁö / v.13, no.1, 2000³â, pp.80-88
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-3591
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200011921402601)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿