|
|
|
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ / v.20, no.2, 2006³â, pp.203-211
|
õ¿¬Àܵð, ÀÎÁ¶Àܵð ¹× ¸Ç¶¥ Ã౸Àå¿¡¼ Ã౸ °æ±â·Â ºñ±³
( Comparison of Play Ability of Soccer Fields with Natural Turfgrass, Artificial Turf and Bare Ground ) |
| ÀÌÀçÇÊ;¹ÚÇöö;±èµÎȯ; °Ç±¹´ë ³óÃà´ëÇпø °ñÇÁÀåÀܵð;°Ç±¹´ë ¿ø¿¹Çаú;°Ç±¹´ë ºÐÀÚ»ý¸í°øÇÐ;
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
| ÃÊ ·Ï |
| º» ¿¬±¸´Â õ¿¬Àܵð, ÀÎÁ¶Àܵð ¹× ¸Ç¶¥ Ã౸ÀåÀÌ Ã౸ °æ±â·Â¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» ±¸¸íÇϰíÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù. õ¿¬Àܵð Ã౸ÀåÀº ÇÑÁöÇü Àܵð(ÄËÅÍŰ ºí·ç±×·¡½º 80%+ÆÛ·¹´Ï¾ó ¶óÀ̱׷¡½º 20%)¿Í Áß¿±Çü Çѱ¹Àܵð·Î Á¶¼ºµÈ Ã౸ÀåÀ̸ç, ÀÎÁ¶Àܵð Ã౸ÀåÀº Äڴϱ׸° $DV5000^{TM}$À¸·Î Á¶¼ºÇÏ¿´°í ¸Ç¶¥ Ã౸ÀåÀº ¸¶»çÅä·Î Á¶¼ºµÇ¾ú´Ù. Ã౸ °æ±â·Â ºÐ¼®À» À§ÇÑ º¼ ±¸¸§°Å¸®(m)¿Í ¼öÁ÷ º¼¸®¹Ù¿îµå(m)´Â 2005³â°ú 2006³â °Ç±¹´ëÇб³ ½ºÆ÷Ã÷°úÇП¿î¿¡¼ Á¶»çÇÏ¿´´Ù. º» ½ÇÇè¿¡ »ç¿ëµÈ °øÀº Çѱ¹Ã౸Çùȸ(Korea Football Association)¿¡¼ °øÀÎµÈ Hummel Air Vision #1À» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿´°í °ø±â¾ÐÀº 1.0 1bs¸¦ À¯ÁöÇÏ¿´´Ù. º¼ ±¸¸§°Å¸®´Â ¸Ç¶¥ Ã౸Àå(13.6m) > ÀÎÁ¶Àܵð Ã౸Àå(11.4m) > ÇÑÁöÇü ÀܵðÃ౸Àå(7.8m) > Çѱ¹Àܵð Ã౸Àå(4.7m) ¼øÀ¸·Î ±æ¾ú´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ º¼ ±¸¸§°Å¸®´Â ÀܵðÀÇ »ç¿ëºóµµ°¡ ÀûÀ»¼ö·Ï, ÀܵðÀÇ Á÷¸³Á¤µµ°¡ °ÇÒ¼ö·Ï, ÀܵðÀÇ ¹Ðµµ°¡ ³ôÀ»¼ö·Ï ª¾ÆÁö´Â °æÇâÀ̾ú´Ù. ¼öÁ÷ º¼¸®¹Ù¿îµå ¿ª½Ã ¸Ç¶¥ Ã౸Àå(1.0m) > ÀÎÁ¶Àܵð Ã౸Àå(0.98m) > ÇÑÁöÇü Àܵð Ã౸Àå(0.68m) > Çѱ¹ÀܵðÃ౸Àå(0.4m) ¼øÀ¸·Î ³ô¾Ò´Ù. ¼öÁ÷ º¼ ¸®¹Ù¿îµå´Â ÀܵðÀÇ »ç¿ëºóµµ°¡ ÀûÀ»¼ö·Ï, ÀܵðÀÇ Á÷¸³Á¤µµ°¡ °ÇÒ¼ö·Ï, ÀܵðÀÇ ¹Ðµµ°¡ ³ôÀ»¼ö·Ï ³·¾ÆÁö´Â °æÇâÀ̾ú´Ù. Ç¥Áذü¸®°¡ µÇ´Â ÇÑÁöÇü Àܵð Ã౸ÀåÀº Á¶¼º¿¬¼ö¿¡ µû¸¥ º¼ ±¸¸§°Å¸®¿Í ¼öÁ÷ º¼ ¸®¹Ù¿îµå¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀÌ Àû¾ú´Ù. ¹Ý¸é Ç¥ÁØ °ü¸®°¡ ÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀº Çѱ¹Àܵð Ã౸ÀåÀº ¿À·¡ µÉ¼ö·Ï º¼ ±¸¸§°Å¸®´Â ±æ¾îÁ³°í ¼öÁ÷ º¼ ¸®¹Ù¿îµå ¿ª½Ã ³ô¾Ò´Ù. |
|
| This study was initiated to investigate the difference of playing ability among soccer fields established with natural turfgrass, artificial turf and bare ground. The soccer fields with natural turfgrasses were established with cool-season grass(Kentucky bluegrass 80%+Perennial ryegrass 20%) and zoysiagrass. The artificial turf field was constructed with Konigreen $DV5000^{TM}$. Bare ground was sandy soil. Data such as ball rolling distance and vertical ball rebound were collected at the Sports Science Town of Konkuk University from 2005 to 2006. A ball in the study was Hummel Air Vision #1, certified by KFA(Korea Football Association) in ball pressure of 1.01b. Ball rolling distance was the longest on bare ground(13.6m), followed by artificial grass(11.4m), cool-season grass(7.8m) and zoysiagrass(4.7m). It decreased with lower frequency in use, stronger rigidity and higher density of turfgrass. Vertical ball rebound was the highest on bare ground(1.0m), followed by artificial grass(0.9m), cool-season grass(0.6m) and zoysiagrass(0.4m). It was lower under conditions of low use frequency, strong rigidity, and high density. Both ball rolling distance and vertical ball rebound were not greatly affected by cool-season grass maintained with high intensity of culture by years after establishment. However, zoysiagrass field under low intensity of culture showed longer in ball rolling distance and higher in vertical ball rebound with time after establishment. |
| |
| Ű¿öµå |
| º¼ ±¸¸§°Å¸®;¼öÁ÷º¼¸®¹Ù¿îµå;ÀÎÁ¶Àܵð Ã౸Àå;Àܵð ±×¶ó¿îµå;Ã౸ °æ±â·Â;artificial turf;ball rolling distance;soccer play ability;turf ground;vertical ball rebound; |
| |
|
|
 |
|
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸÁö / v.20, no.2, 2006³â, pp.203-211
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-3253
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200617317767396)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î |
|
| ³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|
|