¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ / v.36, no.2, 2008³â, pp.99-112
Á¶°æ°Ç¼³¾÷ÀÇ ±â¼º½ÇÀû º¯µ¿ Ư¼º
( A Study on Changes of Ready Constructed Record in Landscape Construction Industry )
ÀÌ»ó¼®; ¼øÃµ´ëÇб³ Á¶°æÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº Á¶°æ°Ç¼³¾÷ÀÇ Áß¿äÇÑ »ý»êÁöÇ¥ÀÎ ±â¼º½ÇÀûÀ» Á¶»çºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿© Á¶°æ°Ç¼³¾÷ÀÇ ¸ÅÃâ¾× Ư¼ºÀ» ±Ô¸íÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ¿¬±¸¸¦ À§ÇØ Á¶°æ°Ç¼³¾÷À» ÀϹݰǼ³¾÷ÀÎ Á¶°æ°ø»ç¾÷, Àü¹®°Ç¼³¾÷ÀÎ Á¶°æ½ÄÀç°ø»ç¾÷°ú Á¶°æ½Ã¼³¹°¼³Ä¡°ø»ç¾÷À¸·Î ±¸ºÐÇϰí, Ÿ °Ç¼³¾÷°ú Á¶°æ°Ç¼³¾÷ÀÇ ±â¼º½ÇÀû ºñ±³ºÐ¼®, Á¶°æ°Ç¼³¾÷ÀÇ Áö¿ªº° ¿¬µµº° ±â¼º½ÇÀû, °ø»ç1°Ç´ç Æò±Õ±â¼º±Ý¾×, ¾÷ü´ç ¿¬Æò±Õ ±â¼º½ÇÀûÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ °á°ú¸¦ Åä´ë·Î ÇÏ¿© Á¶°æ°Ç¼³¾÷ÀÇ ±â¼º½ÇÀûÀÇ º¯µ¿ Ư¼º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °íÂûÀ» ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ÁÖ¿ä°á°ú´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. 1. Á¶°æ°Ç¼³¾÷Àº 1997³âºÎÅÍ 2006³â±îÁö 10³â°£ Ÿ °Ç¼³ ºÐ¾ß¿¡ ºñÇØ ±â¼º½ÇÀûÀÌ »ó´ëÀûÀ¸·Î Å©°Ô Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿© ¿Ô´Âµ¥, ÀϹݰǼ³¾÷¿¡¼­ Á¶°æ°ø»ç¾÷ÀÇ ±â¼º½ÇÀûÀÌ Â÷ÁöÇÏ´Â ºñÁßÀº 0.9%¿¡¼­ 1.9%À¸·Î Áõ°¡Çϰí, Àü¹®°ø»ç¾÷¿¡¼­ Á¶°æ½ÄÀç°ø»ç¾÷ÀÇ ±â¼º½ÇÀûÀÌ Â÷ÁöÇÏ´Â ºñÁßÀº 1.3%¿¡¼­ 2.5%, Á¶°æ½Ã¼³¹°¼³Ä¡°ø»ç¾÷ÀÇ ±â¼º½ÇÀûÀº 0.5%¿¡¼­ 1.5%·Î Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ Á¶°æ°ø»ç¾÷ÀÇ ±â¼º½ÇÀû Áõ°¡À²Àº 367%, Á¶°æ½ÄÀç°ø»ç¾÷Àº 328%, Á¶°æ ½Ã¼³¹°¼³Ä¡°ø»ç¾÷Àº 515% ±ÞÁõÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç, ¼±ÇàÁöÇ¥ÀÎ 2006³â °è¾à½ÇÀû ÀÌ Å©°Ô Áõ°¡ÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î º¸¾Æ ÇâÈÄ ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ Áõ°¡ Ãß¼¼°¡ Áö¼ÓµÉ °ÍÀ¸·Î Àü¸ÁµÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù. 2. Áö¿ªº° ±â¼º½ÇÀû¿¡¼­ ¼­¿ï, °æ±âÀÇ ±â¼º½ÇÀûÀÌ »ó´ëÀûÀ¸·Î ³ô¾Æ Á¶°æ°ø»ç¾÷Àº ÀüüÀÇ 53.5%, Á¶°æ½ÄÀç°ø»ç¾÷Àº ÀüüÀÇ 55.1%, Á¶°æ½Ã¼³¹°¼³Ä¡°ø»ç¾÷Àº ÀüüÀÇ 71.2%¸¦ Â÷ÁöÇϰí ÀÖ¾î, Á¶°æ°Ç¼³½ÃÀåÀÇ ¼öµµ±Ç ÁýÁßÈ­ Çö»óÀÌ ½É°¢ÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. 3. Á¶°æ°Ç¼³¾÷ÀÇ ´ÜÀ§°ø»ç´ç Æò±Õ±â¼º±Ý¾×Àº Á¶°æ°ø»ç 5¾ï 4,000¸¸¿ø, Á¶°æ½ÄÀç°ø»ç 7,320¸¸¿ø, Á¶°æ½Ã¼³¹°°ø»ç´Â 7,740¸¸¿øÀ¸·Î Á¶°æ °ø»çÀÇ 1°Ç´ç Æò±Õ°è¾à±Ý¾×ÀÌ »ó´ëÀûÀ¸·Î ³ôÀº °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼® µÇ¾ú´Ù. Á¶°æ°ø»ç¿Í Á¶°æ½ÄÀç°ø»ç´Â ¿¬µµº°·Î ¶Ñ·ÇÇÑ Áõ°¡¼¼¸¦ º¸¿©ÁÖ°í ÀÖÁö ¸øÇϰí ÀÖÀ¸³ª, Á¶°æ½Ã¼³¹°¼³Ä¡°ø»ç´Â Áö¼ÓÀûÀ¸·Î °ø»ç±Ô¸ð°¡ Ä¿Áö°í ÀÖ¾î 2002³âºÎÅÍ Á¶°æ½ÄÀç°ø»çº¸´Ù 1°Ç´ç Æò±Õ±â¼º±Ý¾×ÀÌ ³ô¾ÆÁö°í ÀÖ´Ù. 4. Á¶°æ°Ç¼³¾÷ ¾÷ü´ç ¿¬Æò±Õ ±â¼º½ÇÀûÀº Á¶°æ°ø»ç¾÷ 19¾ï 7,000¸¸¿ø, Á¶°æ½ÄÀç°ø»ç¾÷ 7¾ï 9,080¸¸¿ø, Á¶°æ½Ã¼³¹°¼³Ä¡°ø»ç¾÷ 4¾ï 6,890¸¸¿øÀ¸·Î Á¶°æ°ø»ç¾÷ÀÇ ¾÷ü´ç ¿¬Æò±Õ ±â¼º½ÇÀûÀÌ ³ôÀº °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ±×·¯³ª Á¶°æ°ø»ç¾÷ ¹× Á¶°æ½ÄÀç°ø»ç¾÷Àº Àüü ±â¼º½ÇÀûÀÌ Áö¼ÓÀûÀ¸·Î Áõ°¡ÇØ ¿ÔÀ½¿¡µµ ºÒ±¸ÇÏ°í ¿¬Æò±Õ ±â¼º½ÇÀûÀÌ Áõ°¡ÇÏÁö ¸øÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¿¬±¸°á°ú¸¦ Á¾ÇÕÇØ º¸¸é, Á¶°æ°Ç¼³¾÷ÀÇ ±â¼º½ÇÀûÀº Ÿ °Ç¼³¾÷¿ªº¸´Ù ³ôÀº ¼ºÀåÀ» ÇØ¿Ô°í, ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¼ºÀåÃß¼¼°¡ ÇâÈÄ¿¡µµ °è¼ÓµÉ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ±×·¯³ª Á¶°æ°Ç¼³¾÷ÀÇ Áö¼ÓÀûÀÎ ¼ºÀå¿¡µµ ºÒ±¸Çϰí Á¶°æ°ø»çÀÇ ±Ô¸ð°¡ »ó´ëÀûÀ¸·Î ÀÛ´Ù´Â Á¡°ú Á¶°æ°Ç¼³¾÷ü¼öÀÇ ±ÞÁõ¿¡ µû¶ó Á¶°æ°Ç¼³¾÷üÀÇ ±â¼º½ÇÀûÀÌ ¿µ¼¼ÇÏ´Ù´Â ¹®Á¦´Â ÇØ°áµÇ°í ÀÖÁö ¾Ê´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ¹àÇôÁ³´Ù. ¾Æ¿ï·¯ ¼­¿ï, °æ±â, ÀÎõ µî ¼öµµ±Ç Áö¿ª¿¡¼­ Â÷ÁöÇÏ´Â ±â¼º½ÇÀûÀÌ »ó´ëÀûÀ¸·Î ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³ª°í ÀÖ¾î Á¶°æ°Ç¼³½ÃÀåÀÇ ¼öµµ±Ç ÁýÁßÈ­ Çö»óÀÌ ½É°¢ÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¹àÇôÁ³´Ù.
The purpose of this study was to analyze on changes of ready constructed record(RCR) in landscape construction industry for 10 years from 1997 to 2006. For the study, according to the classification system of Korea construction industry, landscape construction industry were classified into landscape constructor as a general constructor, landscape planting constructor and landscape facilities constructor as special constructors. The results are as follows: 1. The RCR in landscape construction industry have increased for 10 years higher than other construction industry. Concretely the RCR ratio of landscape constructor has increased 0.9% in 1997 to 1.9% in 2006, the RCR ratio of landscape planting constructor 1.3% to 2.5%, and the RCR ratio of landscape facilities constructor 0.5% to 1.5%. Futhermore this increasing trend has been strengthened during the last a few years. 2. Differently from landscape constructor, the subcontract ratio of landscape planting constructor and landscape facilities constructor were higher, especially landscape facilities constructor was highest amount for 71.1% in the subcontract ratio. 3. The RCR of landscape construction industry in the metropolitan area including Seoul, Kyunggi, was higher than other region's, and the ratio of RCR of landscape constructor in this area was 53.5%, landscape planting constructor's 58.2%, and landscape facilities constructor 75.0%. 4. The yearly RCR per company and the RCR by project of landscape constructor and landscape planting constructor were stagnant. However, landscape facilities constructor's RCR showed an upward trend as years go by. This study was focused on the RCR of landscape construction industry, further study on the factors to affect the RCR of landscape construction industry and the RCR by project types is required in the near future.
 
Ű¿öµå
Á¶°æ°ø»ç¾÷;Á¶°æ½ÄÀç°ø»ç¾÷;Á¶°æ½Ã¼³¹°¼³Ä¡°ø»ç¾÷;ÀϹݰǼ³¾÷;Çϵµ±ÞÀ²;Landscape Contractor;Landscape Planting Constructor;Landscape Facilities Constructor;General Constructor;Subcontract Ratio;
 
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸÁö / v.36, no.2, 2008³â, pp.99-112
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1225-1755
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200827448607953)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿