¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ / v.36, no.3, 2008³â, pp.29-38
Çб³½£ ¼Ó¼ºº° °¡Ä¡Æò°¡ ¿¬±¸
( A Study on the Value Analysis of School Forest )
À±ÈñÁ¤;º¯Àç»ó;±èÀÎÈ£; ³óÃÌÀÚ¿ø°³¹ß¿¬±¸¼Ò;½Å±¸´ëÇРȯ°æÁ¶°æ°ú;½Å±¸´ëÇРȯ°æÁ¶°æ°ú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸´Â µµ½Ã½£ÀÇ ÇϳªÀÎ Çб³½£ÀÇ °¡Ä¡¸¦ Æò°¡ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ» ÁÖ¿äÇÑ ¿¬±¸¸ñÀûÀ¸·Î ÇÑ´Ù. À̸¦ À§ÇØ Áø¼úµÈ ¼±È£¸ðÇüÀÎ ÄÁÁ¶ÀÎÆ® ¸ðÇüÀ» Ȱ¿ëÇÏ¿© Çб³½£ÀÇ È¯°æ»ýÅÂÀû, ±³À°Àû, »çȸ¹®È­Àû, °æÁ¦Àû ¼Ó¼ºÀ» ¿¬±¸ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¹®Ç忬±¸ °á°ú£¬ Çб³½£ÀÇ 4°³ ¼Ó¼º(°¡Ä¡)º° ¼öÁØÀÌ ¼±Á¤µÇ¾ú°í£¬ Çб³½£ °ü°èÀÚ¿Í ºñ°ü°èÀÚ·Î ±¸ºÐÇÏ¿© 279¸í À» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ¼³¹®Á¶»ç¸¦ ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. ºÐ¼® °á°ú, 4°³ ¼Ó¼º Áß °¡Àå Áß¿äÇÑ Çб³½£ÀÇ ¼Ó¼ºÀº °æÁ¦Àû ¼Ó¼ºÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç, ´ÙÀ½À¸·Î ȯ°æ»ýÅÂÀû, »çȸ¹®È­Àû, ±³À°Àû °¡Ä¡ ¼øÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ¸ðÇüÀÇ ÀûÇÕµµ´Â 0.900 ÀÌ»óÀ¸·Î ¸Å¿ì À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. °æÁ¦Àû °¡Ä¡ Áõ¿¡¼­´Â 0¿ø, 1,000¿ø ÀÇ È¿¿ë°ªÀÌ ´Ù¸¥ µÎ ¼öÁغ¸´Ù ³ô°Ô ¼±È£µÇ¾ú°í, ȯ°æ»ýÅÂÀû °¡Ä¡ Áß¿¡¼­´Â µµ½Ã°ø±âÁ¤È­ °¡´ÉÀÇ °ªÀÌ °¡Àå ³ô°í, ´ÙÀ½À¸·Î Çб³°æ°ü Á¶¼º, µ¿¹° ¼­½Ä °ø°£ Á¦°ø, ¹Ì±âÈÄÁ¶Àý ¼øÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ Áö¿ªÁÖ¹ÎÀÇ ¿©°¡È°µ¿°ú °ü·ÃµÈ »çȸ¹®È­Àû °¡Ä¡ Áß¿¡¼­´Â ÀÚ¿¬°üÂûÀÌ »êÃ¥ ¹× ÈÞ½Ä, ¿îµ¿º¸´Ù È¿¿ëÀÌ ´õ ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç, ±³À°Àû °¡Ä¡ Áß¿¡¼­´Â ȯ°æÀÇ Á߿伺 ÀνÄÀÌ °¡Àå ³ô¾Ò°í, Á¤¼­ÇÔ¾ç, Áö½Ä½Àµæ ¼øÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ È¿¿ë°ªÀ» ±âÃÊ·Î °¡±¸´ç WIP¸¦ ÃßÁ¤Çغ» °á°ú, Àüü ÀÀ´äÀÚÀÇ °æ¿ì´Â 3,580¿ø, Çб³½£ °ü°èÀÚ´Â 3,650¿ø, ºñ°ü°èÀÚ´Â 3,540¿øÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. À̸¦ ±Ù°Å·Î ¿¬°£ Àüü °¡±¸ÀÇ ¼ø¼ö °æÁ¦Àû °¡Ä¡¸¦ ÃßÁ¤Çغ¸¸é ¾à 6,820 ¾ï ¿øÀ̸ç, Çб³½£ °ü°èÀÚÀÇ °æ¿ì 6,970¾ï¿ø, ºñ °ü°èÀÚÀÇ °æ¿ì 6£¬750¿øÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
This study intends to analyze the value of school forests, one type of urban forest. For this purpose, four attributes of school forests were investigated, considering ecological, educational, social and economic values using a conjoint model as the stated preference. Based on literature reviews, the levels of the four attributes were selected, and a questionnaire survey was given to 279 urban residents divided into 2 groups: those impacted by school forests and those not. The study results suggest that the most important attribute of school forests is economic value, and next is ecological, social and educational value according to the part-worth model. The fitness level of the model is 0.900(total group) which is very significant. As for the economic value, free and 1,000 won are more critical factors than the other 2 levels, 5,000 won and 10,000 won and air pollution purification and making the school landscape are more critical factors than small habitats and microclimate factors. In addition, regarding the social value related to residents' leisure activities£¬the utility of nature observation is higher than walking and exercising. Finally, for educational value, understanding nature's importance is more critical than the emotions and learning of students. The estimated WTP per household/month is 3,580 won, the group related to school forestsis 3,650 won and the non-related group is 3,540 won. Based on these results, the estimated total economic value of all households per year is 6,820 hundred million won. The group related to school forests is 6,970 hundred million won and the non-related group is 6,750 hundred million won.
 
Ű¿öµå
µµ½Ã½£;µµ½Ã ¿ÀǽºÆäÀ̽º;°æÁ¦Àû °¡Ä¡;ÄÁÁ¶ÀÎÆ® ¸ðÇü;È¿¿ë°ª;Urban Forest;Urban Green Space;Economic Value;Conjoint Model;Utility;
 
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸÁö / v.36, no.3, 2008³â, pp.29-38
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1225-1755
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200833155783312)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿