¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ / v.37, no.3, 2009³â, pp.21-32
°øµ¿ÁÖÅà Áß¾Ó±¤ÀåÀÇ °³¹æ ±¸Á¶¿¡ µû¸¥ Áö¿ª °øµ¿Ã¼ÀǽÄÀÇ Â÷ÀÌ
( Difference in the Sense of Community in Open-Structure Central Squares in Apartment Complexes )
°­¿¬ÁÖ;¹ÚÁ¾¿Ï;Àӽºó; (ÁÖ)¿ì¸®¿£µðÀÚÀÎÆß;(ÁÖ)¿ì¸®¿£µðÀÚÀÎÆß;¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Á¶°æ.Áö¿ª½Ã½ºÅÛ°øÇкÎ;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸´Â µµ½ÃÀÇ ÁÖÅà Àç°³¹ß»ç¾÷À¸·Î ÀÎÇØ Á¡Â÷ ÇØÃ¼µÇ°í ÀÖ´Â Áö¿ª °øµ¿Ã¼ÀǽÄÀÇ È¸º¹À» À§ÇÑ ÇϳªÀÇ ´ë¾ÈÀ¸·Î, °øµ¿ÁÖÅà Áß¾Ó±¤ÀåÀÇ ¹°¸®Àû ÀÔÁö¿¡ µû¸¥ ±¸Á¶Àû Ư¼º¿¡ ÁÖ¸ñÇϰíÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù. ÀÌ´Â Áß¾Ó±¤ÀåÀÌ ´Ü¼øÈ÷ °øµ¿ÁÖÅà °ÅÁÖÀڵ鸸À» À§ÇÑ ³»ÀûÀ̰í Àڱ⠿ϰáÇüÀÇ °ø°£À¸·Î ±â´ÉÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó, ÁÖº¯Áö¿ª Áֹεé°ú ¼ÒÅëÇÏ°í ±³·ùÇϸç Áö¿ª °øµ¿Ã¼ÀÇ °ÅÁ¡À¸·Î Ȱ¼ºÈ­µÈ ¿­¸° °ø°£À¸·Î½á ±× ¹üÀ§°¡ È®ÀåµÉ ¼ö ÀÖÀ½À» ÀǹÌÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ¿¬±¸ÀÇ °¡¼³Àº ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. °øµ¿ÁÖÅà Áß¾Ó±¤ÀåÀÇ ¹°¸®Àû ÀÔÁö¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ±¸Á¶Àû Ư¼ºÀº ÁÖº¯ Áö¿ª¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °øµ¿ÁÖÅà °ÅÁÖÀÚµéÀÇ ½É¸®Àû °³¹æ¼º°ú ÁÖº¯Áö¿ª °ÅÁÖÀÚµéÀÌ °®´Â ½É¸®Àû Á¢±Ù¼º, ±×¸®°í Áö¿ª °øµ¿Ã¼ÀǽĿ¡ °¢°¢ ¿µÇâÀ» ÁְԵȴÙ. ¶ÇÇÑ ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ °³¹æ¼º°ú Á¢±Ù¼ºÀ¸·Î Ç¥ÇöµÇ´Â ½É¸®Àû °Å¸®´Â Áö¿ª °øµ¿Ã¼Àǽİú »óÈ£ ¹ÐÁ¢ÇÑ °ü°è¸¦ Çü¼ºÇÑ´Ù. ¿¬±¸¸¦ À§ÇØ ¿ì¼± Áß¾Ó±¤ÀåÀÌ ´ÜÁö ¿ÜºÎ¸¦ ÇâÇØ ¿­¸° Á¤µµ¿¡ µû¶ó À̸¦ ¿­¸° ±¸Á¶¿Í ´ÝÈù ±¸Á¶·Î À¯ÇüÈ­ÇÏ¿´´Ù. À̸¦ Åä´ë·Î µ¿ÀÏ Áö¿ª ¾ÈÀÇ ºñ½ÁÇÑ Á¶°ÇÀ» °¡Áø ½Å¸² Ǫ¸£Áö¿À¿Í ¹æÇÐ ´ë»óŸ¿î Çö´ë, ±×¸®°í °ü¾Ç Ǫ¸£Áö¿À¿Í ¹æÇÐ »ï¼º ·¡¹Ì¾È 1´ÜÁö¸¦ ´ë»óÁö·Î ¼±Á¤, °¢°¢ °øµ¿ÁÖÅà °ÅÁÖÀÚµé°ú ÁÖº¯Áö¿ª °ÅÁÖÀÚµéÀÇ µÎ °³ Áý´ÜÀ¸·Î ºÐ·ùÇÑ ÈÄ ÃÑ ¿©´ü°³ÀÇ Áý´ÜÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ¼³¹® Á¶»ç¸¦ ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. Áö¿ª °øµ¿Ã¼Àǽİú ½É¸®Àû °³¹æ¼º, ½É¸®Àû Á¢±Ù¼ºÀÇ ÃøÁ¤ µîÀ» ½Ç½ÃÇÑ °á°ú À§ÀÇ ¿¬±¸ °¡¼³µéÀÌ ¸ðµÎ ¼º¸³ÇÔÀ» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. Áï, ¿­¸° ±¸Á¶ÀÇ Áß¾Ó±¤Àå¿¡¼­ Áö¿ª °øµ¿Ã¼Àǽİú ½É¸®Àû °³¹æ¼º, Á¢±Ù¼º µîÀÌ °¢°¢ ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç, ½É¸®Àû °³¹æ¼º°ú Á¢±Ù¼ºÀÌ ³ôÀº °æ¿ì Áö¿ª °øµ¿Ã¼ÀÇ½Ä ¿ª½Ã ³ôÀº °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸´Â Áß¾Ó±¤ÀåÀÇ ¹°¸®Àû ÀÔÁö¼º°ú Áö¿ª ÁֹεéÀÇ ½É¸®Àû °³¹æ¼º, Á¢±Ù¼º, Áö¿ª °øµ¿Ã¼ÀǽÄÀÌ »óÈ£ ¿¬°ü°ü°è¸¦ Çü¼ºÇϰí ÀÖÀ½À» ±¸Ã¼ÀûÀÎ ´ë»óÁö¸¦ ÅëÇØ ºÐ¼®, °ËÁõÇÏ¿´´Ù´Â µ¥¿¡ ÀÇÀǸ¦ µÎ¸ç, ÇâÈÄ ½ÇõÀûÀÎ Áß¾Ó±¤ÀåÀÇ °èȹ°ú Á¶¼ºÀ» À§ÇÑ ÇϳªÀÇ ÀÌ·ÐÀû ±Ù°Å°¡ µÉ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀÌ´Ù.
As an alternative for restoring a sense of community which has been broken up due to urban residence redevelopment, this study focuses on structural characteristics according to physical location of central squares in apartment complexes. Central squares do not simply function as inner-aiming and self-completed spaces for the residents, but their role can be expanded to a core location which encourages neighbors to communicate and interact with each other. The suppositions for this study are as follows. Structural characteristics according to the physical locations of the central squares in apartment complexes affect apartment residents' openness toward their neighbors and non-residents' accessibility to the square. At the same time, it influences the sense of community. In addition, psychological distance which is represented as psychological openness and accessibility forms a reciprocal relationship with the sense of community. For the study, we first categorized central squares as either open-structure or closed-structure based on how accessible it is from outside the apartment complex. According to these types of central squares, Sillim Prugio, Banghak Deasang Town Hyundai, Gwanak Prugio and Banghak Samsung Raemian 1 which have similar conditions and different structures were selected as sites of the study. Then each apartment complex was classified by apartment residents and non-residents so that eight groups were prepared for the survey. The results of the questionnaire survey especially regarding measuring the sense of community, psychological openness and accessibility indicated that the suppositions were right. Hence, the sense of community, psychological openness and accessibility are high in a central square with an open-structure while high standards of psychological openness and accessibility guarantee a positive sense of community. This study is meaningful in that it verifies that the physical location of central squares is reciprocally related to psychological openness, accessibility and a sense of community. At the same time, this study may serve as theoretical grounds for the planning and construction of practical central squares.
 
Ű¿öµå
Áö¿ª °øµ¿Ã¼ °ÅÁ¡;½É¸®Àû °Å¸®;°³¹æ¼º;Á¢±Ù¼º;´ÝÈù ±¸Á¶;Central Community Space;Psychological Distance;Openness;Accessibility;Closed-Structure;
 
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸÁö / v.37, no.3, 2009³â, pp.21-32
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1225-1755
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200932056738256)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿