¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ / v.37, no.5, 2009³â, pp.42-52
Á¶°ÇºÎ°¡Ä¡ÃøÁ¤¹ýÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ÀÚ¿¬È޾縲 È޾簡ġ ÃøÁ¤
( Study on Measuring the Value of Recreational Forests Using Contingent Valuation Method )
°­±â·¡; °æºÏ´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø Á¶°æÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
ÈÞ¾çÀ» ÅëÇÑ °³ÀÎÀÇ Àھư³¹ß°ú ÁÖÀ§»ç¶÷µé°úÀÇ ±³À¯ÀÇ Àå¼Ò, ÀÚ¿¬¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ±³À°ÀÇ Àå¼Ò, ½É¸®Àû ¾ÈÁ¤°ú Á¤½ÅÀû Æí¾ÈÇÔÀÇ Àå¼Ò·Î¼­ ÀÚ¿¬È޾縲ÀÌ °¢±¤¹Þ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ÇÏÁö¸¸ ´Ù¾çÇÑ ±â´ÉÀ» Á¦°øÇØ ÁÖ´Â ÀÚ¿¬È޾縲ÀÇ ÀÚ¿¬Àû °¡Ä¡¿Í ±× °ø°£ÀÌ °¡Áö´Â ¼ÒÁßÇÔÀ» °£°úÇϱ⠽±´Ù. ´©±¸³ª Á¤ÇØÁø ÀÔÀå·á¿Í »ç¿ë·á¸¦ ³»¸é ¸¼Àº °ø±â¿Í ÄèÀûÇÑ È¯°æ, ÈÞ½ÄÀ» À§ÇÑ °ø°£À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ°Ô µÈ´Ù. ±×·¯³ª À̿밴µéÀÌ Áö±ÞÇÑ ±Ý¾×ÀÌ ´©¸®°í ÀÖ´Â ÀÚ¿¬ÀÇ ¿Ã¹Ù¸¥ °¡Ä¡ÀÎÁö´Â ±íÀÌ °í·ÁÇØ ºÁ¾ß ÇÒ °úÁ¦ ÁßÀÇ Çϳª¶ó°í »ý°¢µÈ´Ù. ±×¸®°í À̿밴µéÀÌ ¸Ó¹«´Â ȯ°æÀÌ °æÁ¦ÀûÀ¸·Î ¾î´À Á¤µµÀÇ °¡Ä¡°¡ µÇ´ÂÁö ±× ±Ý¾×À» ÃßÁ¤ÇÏ¿© Á¦½ÃÇÔÀ¸·Î ÈÞ¾ç ¹× È¯°æÀÇ °¡Ä¡¸¦ ¹Ù¸£°Ô ÀνÄÇϵµ·Ï º» ¿¬±¸°¡ ¼öÇàµÇ¾ú´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¸ñÀûÀ» ´Þ¼ºÇϱâ À§ÇÑ °¡Àå È¿À²ÀûÀÎ ¹æ¹ýÀÌ °æÁ¦ÇÐÀûÀÎ Á¢±ÙÀ̸ç, ÀÌ¿¡ µû¸¥ ¹æ¹ýÀº ±âÁ¸¿¡ Á¦½ÃµÈ ¿¬±¸¹æ¹ýÀ» Ãæ½ÇÈ÷ ÀÌÇàÇÏ¿© ÀûÀýÇϰí Á¤È®ÇÑ ±Ý¾×À» »êÃâÇØ ³»´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ÇÏÁö¸¸ ÀÚ¿¬È޾縲ÀÇ È¯°æ°¡Ä¡´Â ½ÃÀå¿¡¼­ °Å·¡µÇÁö ¾Ê´Â °ø°øÀçÀÇ ¼º°ÝÀÌ °­Çϱ⠶§¹®¿¡ ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ °ø°øÀçÀÇ È¯°æ°¡Ä¡¸¦ Æò°¡ÇÏ´Â ¿©·¯ ¹æ¹ýµéÀ» °í·ÁÇÏ¿© Á¶°ÇºÎ°¡Ä¡ÃøÁ¤¹ý(Contingent Valuation Method: CVM)À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ÀÚ¿¬È޾縲ÀÇ È޾簡ġ¸¦ ÃßÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. Á¶»ç´ë»óÁöÀÇ 1ÀÎ´ç ¿¬°£ È޾簡ġ´Â ÁöºÒÀÇ»ç¾×(Wlingness To Pay: WTP) Áß¾Ó°ª ¾à 16,000¿ø¿¡¼­ WTP Æò±Õ°ª ¾à 25,400¿ø »çÀÌÀ̸ç, Á¶»ç´ë»óÁö ÀÚ¿¬È޾縲 1°³¼ÒÀÇ È޾簡ġ´Â ¿¬°£ ¾à 17¾ï ¿ø¿¡¼­ 27¾ï ¿ø Á¤µµ·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ¸ðÁý´ÜÀ¸·Î ÁöÁ¤ÇÑ 85°³¼Ò Àü±¹ ±¹, °øÀ¯ ÀÚ¿¬È޾縲ÀÇ ¿¬°£ È޾簡ġ´Â ¾à 1,400¾ï ¿ø¿¡¼­ 2,300¾ï ¿ø »çÀÌ·Î ÃßÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÌ ÃßÁ¤µÈ ±Ý¾×Àº À̿밴µéÀÌ ´Ü¼øÈ÷ ÀçÈ­¿Í ½Ã°£À» ÅõÀÚÇÏ¸é ¾ðÁ¦µçÁö °¡Áú ¼ö Àִ ȯ°æÀÌÁö¸¸ ÃßÁ¤µÈ ȯ°æÀÇ °¡Ä¡¸¦ ÇöÀç ÅëÈ­·®À¸·Î Á¦½ÃÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ÀÚ¿¬°ú ȯ°æÀÇ ¼ÒÁßÇÔÀ» ¾Ë·Á ÁÖ°í, ´õ ³ªÀº ÈÞ¾ç ¸¸Á·À» ´À³¢µµ·Ï Çϴµ¥ ÀÇÀǰ¡ ÀÖ´Ù°í ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù.
Recreational forests are catching on as places for personal development through recreation, association with people, education about nature, mind relaxation and spiritual peace. However, the value and significance of recreational forests with various functions are easily overlooked. Whoever pays fees for admission to facilities are able to enjoy fresh air, a comfortable environment, and space for rest. It should be taken into consideration whether the fee which customers pay is appropriate for the value of nature they are enjoying. This study is involved in giving the right recognition to the value of recreation and environment by estimating economically the value of the environment in which visitors stay, and presenting the appropriate price. The most efficient way to achieve this goal is through an economic approach, which suggests following established research skills and yielding suitable and accurate amounts of money. The environmental value of a recreational forests is estimated through contingent valuation method(CVM), which is chosen among several methods to estimate public facilities because the value of recreational forests has strong characteristics as public facilities which are not traded in the market. The annual recreation value per person of surveyed recreational forests is Willingness To Pay(WTP) with a mean between about 16,000 won and 25,400 won. The recreation value of one recreational forest surveyed is annually between approximately 1.7 billions won and 2.7 billions won. The annual recreation value of 85 national and public recreational forests is presumed to be between about 140 billions won and 230 billions won. The presumed amount of money is the environment in which visitors can enjoy whenever they invest some money and time. Indeed, it is more than that; it provides visitors with a greater sense of satisfaction and the recognition of the preciousness of nature and the environment.
 
Ű¿öµå
°ø°øÀç;ȯ°æ°¡Ä¡;°æÁ¦Àû °¡Ä¡;¿¬°£È޾簡ġ;°æÁ¦ÇÐÀû Á¢±Ù;Recreational Values;Environmental Value;Recreational Forests;Utility Theory;
 
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸÁö / v.37, no.5, 2009³â, pp.42-52
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1225-1755
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200911764899024)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿