|
|
|
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ / v.37, no.5, 2009³â, pp.1-12
|
ÀÚ¿¬Ä£ÈÀûÀÎ °ø¿ø½Ã¼³ ¼³Ä¡¸¦ À§ÇÑ Á¤Ã¥¹æÇâ - ±¹¸³°ø¿ø °ø¿ø½Ã¼³ÀÇ ÀÚ¿¬Ä£È¼º Æò°¡¸¦ ±Ù°Å·Î -
( Policy Directions to Build on Nature-Friendly Park Facilities - Based on an Evaluation on the Nature-Friendliness of Park Facilities in National Parks - ) |
| ¹Úâ¼®;¹è¹Î±â;±èÅÂÁø; Çѱ¹È¯°æÁ¤Ã¥.Æò°¡¿¬±¸¿ø;Çѱ¹È¯°æÁ¤Ã¥.Æò°¡¿¬±¸¿ø;ÇѰæ´ëÇб³ Á¶°æÇаú;
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
| ÃÊ ·Ï |
| º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº ±¹¸³°ø¿ø ³»¿¡ ÀÚ¿¬Ä£ÈÀûÀÎ °ø¿ø½Ã¼³ÀÇ ¼³°è¿Í ¼³Ä¡¸¦ À§ÇÑ Á¤Ã¥¹æÇâÀ» Á¦½ÃÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù. À̸¦ À§Çؼ ±¹³» ¿Ü ģȯ°æ°Ç¹° ÀÎÁõÁ¦µµ¿Í °ü·Ã ¿¬±¸¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °íÂûÀ» ÅëÇØ ÀÔÁö, ¼³°è¿Í ¼³Ä¡, ¿î¿µ°ú °ü¸®ºÎºÐº°·Î ÀÚ¿¬Ä£È¼º Æò°¡ÁöÇ¥¸¦ °³¹ßÇÏ¿´´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼´Â 19°³ ±¹¸³°ø¿øÀÇ 26°³ °ø¿ø»ç¹«¼Ò¿¡¼ ½ÇÁ¦ ½Ã¼³À» °ü¸®Çϰí ÀÖ´Â °ø¿ø°ü¸®ÀÚ 79¸íÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÑ ¼³¹®Á¶»ç¸¦ ÅëÇØ ÀÚ¿¬Ä£È¼º Æò°¡¸¦ À§ÇÑ ÀڷḦ ¼öÁýÇÏ¿´´Ù. ºÐ¼®¹æ¹ýÀº ±â¼úºÐ¼®, Áý´Ü°£ Æò±ÕÀÇ Â÷À̺м®, ´ÙÂ÷¿øÃ´µµ¹ý, ¿äÀκм®À» Ȱ¿ëÇÏ¿´´Ù. ºÐ¼®°á°ú, 1) ÀÚ¿¬Ä£È¼º Æò°¡ÁöÇ¥µé °£ÀÇ »ó´ëÀû Á߿䵵¸¦ »êÁ¤ÇÑ °á°ú, ½Ã¼³ÀÇ ÀÔÁö °ü·ÃÁöÇ¥ÀÇ Á߿䵵°¡ °¡Àå ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. 2) °ø¿ø½Ã¼³ÀÇ ÀÚ¿¬Ä£È¼º ¼öÁØ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Æò°¡ °á°ú, ÀÔÁö °ü·Ã ÁöÇ¥µéÀÇ ÀÚ¿¬Ä£È¼º ¼öÁØÀÌ °¡Àå ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³ ¹Ý¸é, ½Ã¼³ÀÇ ¼³°è ¹× ¼³Ä¡ °ü·Ã ÁöÇ¥µéÀÇ ¼öÁØÀÌ ³·°Ô Æò°¡µÇ¾ú´Ù. ƯÈ÷, ¿¡³ÊÁö È¿À²È¿Í °ü·ÃµÈ ÁöÇ¥µéÀÇ Æò°¡°ªÀÌ °¡Àå ³·°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. 3) ½Ã¼³º°·Î º¸¸é, ´ëÇǼÒÀÇ ÀÚ¿¬Ä£È¼ºÀÌ °¡Àå ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³ ¹Ý¸é, ÈÞ°Ô¼ÒÀÇ ÀÚ¿¬Ä£È¼ºÀÌ °¡Àå ¶³¾îÁö´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î Æò°¡µÇ¾ú´Ù. 4) Àü¹ÝÀûÀ¸·Î º¼ ¶§, ¼³¾Ç»ê, ¿À´ë»ê, žÈÇØ¾È±¹¸³°ø¿øÀÇ °ø¿ø½Ã¼³¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÚ¿¬Ä£È¼º ¼öÁØÀÌ ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³ ¹Ý¸é, °æÁÖ¿Í ¼Ó¸®»ê ±¹¸³°ø¿øÀÇ ÀÚ¿¬Ä£È¼º ¼öÁØÀº ¶³¾îÁö´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î Æò°¡µÇ¾ú´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸ °á°ú´Â ÀÚ¿øÀý¾à ¹× ÀÚ¿¬»ýŰè¿Í °ø¿øÀÚ¿øÀ» º¸Á¸Çϰí Ž¹æ°´ÀÇ Æí¸®ÇÑ ÀÌ¿ëÀ» À§ÇÑ ÀÚ¿¬Ä£ÈÀûÀÎ °ø¿ø½Ã¼³ ¼³Ä¡¸¦ À§ÇÑ ±Ç°í±âÁØÀ» ¸¶·ÃÇϴµ¥ Ȱ¿ëµÉ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀÌ´Ù. |
|
| The purpose of this research was to propose policy directions for the design and construction of nature-friendly park facilities (PF) in national parks. In order to do that, nature-friendliness evaluation indicators(NEIs) used in green building rating systems and related articles were reviewed. After the initial literature review was complete, NEIs for park facilities based on location, design, construction, operation, and management sectors were developed. Data was obtained through a questionnaire completed by 79 managers at 19 national parks in Korea in 2008. The answers were analyzed using descriptive statistical methods, a t-test, a multi-dimensional analysis, and a factor analysis. This research found that: 1) The results indicated that based on relative weight calculation, the location condition was evaluated as the most important; 2) The evaluation results regarding the degree of nature-friendliness of park facilities showed that location condition was ranked higher than design and construction--in addition, the evaluated values of indicators related to energy efficiency were ranked the lowest; 3) the level of nature-friendliness of shelter was given the highest level, but resting facility was the lowest level; 4) Overall, park facilities at Mt. Seorak, Mt. Odae, and Taean Coast national parks showed high levels of nature-friendliness. But park facilities at Mt. Gyeongju and Mt. Songni national parks showed low levels of nature-friendliness. The results of this research shall contribute to the establishment of tailor-made management policies, the development of detailed guidelines for increased energy efficiency and visitor satisfaction, and the preservation of ecosystems and natural resources in Korea's national parks. |
| |
| Ű¿öµå |
| ģȯ°æ°ÇÃ๰;ÀÚ¿¬Ä£È¼º Æò°¡ÁöÇ¥;´ÙÂ÷¿øÃ´µµ¹ý;±Ç°í±âÁØ;Green Building;Nature-Friendliness Evaluation Indicator;Multi-Dimensional Scale;Guidelines; |
| |
|
|
 |
|
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸÁö / v.37, no.5, 2009³â, pp.1-12
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1225-1755
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200911764899018)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î |
|
| ³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|
|