¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ / v.38, no.1, 2010³â, pp.84-97
¿þ½ºÆ® ÿ½Ã °³¹ß°ú ÇÏÀ̶óÀÎÀÇ ¿ªÇÒ¿¡¼­ ³ªÅ¸³­ ·£µå½ºÄÉÀÌÇÁ ¾î¹Ù´ÏÁòÀÇ ¼º°Ý
( Landscape Urbanism in Special West Chelsea District Rezoning and High Line Open Space Redevelopment Project )
À±Èñ¿¬; Á¦ÀÓ½º ÄÚ³Ê ÇÊµå ¿ÀÆÛ·¹À̼Ç;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
·£µå½ºÄÉÀÌÇÁ ¾î¹Ù´ÏÁòÀº 90³â´ë ´ëµÎµÈ Á¶°æ°èÀÇ ÀÌ·ÐÀ̸ç, ¿äÁ¡Àº µµ½Ã ¼³°èÀÇ °úÁ¤¿¡¼­ ·£µå½ºÄÉÀÌÇÁ ¿ä¼ÒÀÇ Á߿伺À» °­Á¶Çϰí, ¿ÀÇ ½ºÆäÀ̽º Àü·«ÀÌ ¼³°è °úÁ¤À» À̲ô´Â Åä´ë°¡ µÇ¾î¾ß ÇÑ´Ù´Â µ¥¿¡ ÀÖ´Ù. ±×·¯³ª ÀÌ ÀÌ·ÐÀÌ µµ½Ã ¼³°è¿¡ °¡Á®¿Â ÇüÅÂÀûÀÎ ¿µÇâ°ú ÇØ¼®ÀÌ ¾ø´Ù´Â Á¡Àº ºñÆÇÀÇ ¿©Áö¸¦ ³²°Ü ¿Ô´Ù. ÀÌ·ÐÀÇ Á¦ÀÇÀÚµéÀÌ ¸¹ÀÌ ¾ð±ÞÇÏ°í ¿¹·Î½á »ç¿ëÇß´ø ÇÁ·ÎÁ§Æ®´Â ±Ô¸ð°¡ Å« ´ëÇü °ø¿øÀ̶ó ÇÒ ¼ö Àִµ¥, ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¿ÀÇ ½ºÆäÀ̽º´Â µµ½Ã¿ÍÀÇ °ü°è¸¦ ¹ÐÁ¢ÇÏ°Ô Á¦½ÃÇØ ÁÖÁö ¸øÇÑ´Ù´Â ÇѰ踦 Áö´Ñ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â ÇÏÀ̶óÀÎ(High Line)ÀÌ ´ëÇ¥Çϴ Ư¼öÇÑ ¼ÒÇü °ø¿øÀÌ Áö´Ñ ·£µå½ºÄÉÀÌÇÁ ¾î¹Ù´ÏÁòÀûÀÎ ¿ä¼Ò¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿©, ÇÏÀ̶óÀÎÀÌ ÀÌ À̷п¡ ÀÔ°¢ÇÑ ÇÁ·ÎÁ§Æ®¶ó °£ÁÖµÉ ¼ö ÀÖÀ½À» º¸ÀÎ µÚ, À̰¡ ¿þ½ºÆ® ÿ½Ã ÀçÁ¤ºñ °úÁ¤¿¡¼­ µµ½Ã ¼³°è¿¡ ÀÛÀº ½ºÄÉÀÏÀÇ º¯È­¸¦ ÁÖµµÇßÀ½À» °á·Ð ³»·È´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ ·£µå½ºÄÉÀÌÇÁ ¾î¹Ù´ÏÁò ÀÌ·ÐÀº ÇöÀç ´ëÇü °ø¿ø¿¡ ±¹ÇѵǾî ÀÖ´ø ¿¬±¸ ´ë»óÀ» ¼ÒÇü °ø¿øÀ¸·Îµµ ³ÐÇô¾ß Çϸç, ÀÛÀº ½ºÄÉÀÏ¿¡¼­ ÀϾ´Â »óÈ£ ÀÛ¿ë¿¡¼­ ±× ÇüÅÂÀû ¿µÇâ·ÂÀ» ã¾Æ¾ß ÇÑ´Ù. À̸¦ À§Çؼ­´Â ÇÏÀ̶óÀΰú °°Àº ¼ÒÇü °ø¿øÀÌ ÁÖº¯ Áö¿ª°ú ÁÖ°í¹Þ´Â ¿µÇâ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °üÂû°ú Á¤·®Àû, ÇüÅÂÀû ºÐ¼® °úÁ¤ÀÌ µÚµû¶ó¾ß Çϸç, ÀÌ·Î½á µµÃâµÈ ±¸Ã¼ÀûÀÎ Àü·«ÀÌ ÀÖ¾î¾ß¸¸ »õ·Î¿î µµ½Ã ¼³°è ÇÁ·ÎÁ§Æ®¿¡ Àû¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¿ÏÀü¼ºÀ» Áö´Ñ ÀÌ·ÐÀ¸·Î °Åµì³¯ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀÌ´Ù.
Landscape urbanism emerges as an alternative to the urban design theories of the past century, emphasizing landscape as an organizing principle, integrating the medium of different elements of the urban environment. However, ongoing criticism of the theory's lack of consideration for physical urban morphology has not supported the integrity of the theory. Large parks, which many proponents of the theory have referred to, possess valuable and interesting points in their design and management. This also shows the limitation of not being able to show the close physical relationship between open space and the city. In this study, the High Line project was analyzed to verify it as founded on landscape urbanism, providing that landscape urbanism drives the urban morphology on a small scale rather than a large one. This paper concludes that landscape urbanism should include small parks as one kind of study model with the small grained interaction between open spaces and the cities under this category to broaden and deepen the perspective. Also, the effort to analyze quantified and physical consequences of the theory through close observation should be followed to extract the design strategies to be applied to future projects.
 
Ű¿öµå
µµ½Ã ¼³°è;µµ½Ã ÇüÅÂ;¼ÒÇü °ø¿ø;Á¤·®Àû ºÐ¼®;Urban Design;Urban Morphology;Small Park;Quantitative Analysis;
 
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸÁö / v.38, no.1, 2010³â, pp.84-97
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1225-1755
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201027463259413)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿