¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ / v.38, no.1, 2010³â, pp.1-11
µµ½Ã°ø¿øÀÇ °ø±ÞÀÎÀÚ Æò°¡¸ðÇü
( An Evaluation Model on Supply Factors of Urban Park )
À庴¹®; ¿µ³²´ëÇб³ Á¶°æÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸´Â 'µµ½Ã°ø¿øÀÇ °ø±ÞÀÎÀÚ°¡ µµ½Ã°ø¿øÀÇ ÀÌ¿ë ¸¸Á·µµ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀº ¹«¾ùÀΰ¡?'¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸Àǹ®¿¡ ÇØ´äÀ» Á¦°øÇϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© µµ½Ã°ø¿øÀÇ °ø±ÞÀÎÀÚÀÎ ¸Å·Â¹°, ¼­ºñ½º, Á¢±Ù¼º, Á¤º¸, ÃËÁøÀÌ µµ½Ã°ø¿øÀÇ ÀÌ¿ë ¸¸Á·µµ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» Æò°¡ÇÔÀ» ¿¬±¸¸ñÀûÀ¸·Î ÇÑ´Ù. µµ½Ã°ø¿øÀÇ °ø±ÞÀÎÀÚ¿¡ °üÇÑ ÀÌ·ÐÀû °íÂûÀ» Åä´ë·Î ¿ÜºÎÀû °ø±ÞÀÎÀÚ¿Í ³»ºÎÀû °ø±ÞÀÎÀÚ°¡ ÀÌ¿ë ¸¸Á·µµ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» ÇϳªÀÇ Àΰú¸ðÇüÀ¸·Î ±¸¼ºÇÑ °³³äÀû ƲÀ» ±¸¼ºÇÏ¿© °¡¼³À» µµÃâÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¿¬±¸°¡¼³ÀÇ ½ÇÁõÀû °ËÁ¤À» À§ÇÑ ÀÚ·á´Â 8°³ÀÇ µµ½Ã°ø¿øÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÒ´çÃßÃâ¹æ¹ýÀ» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© ¼±Á¤µÈ 452¸íÀÇ °ø¿ø ÀÌ¿ëÀÚ¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ¼³¹®Á¶»ç¸¦ ÅëÇØ ¼öÁýÇÏ¿´´Ù. ºÒ¼º½ÇÇÑ ÀÀ´ä°ú ÀÌ»óÄ¡¸¦ Á¦¿ÜÇÑ 356¸Å°¡ ºÐ¼®¿¡ »ç¿ëµÇ¾ú´Ù. ¼öÁýµÈ ÀÚ·á´Â LISREL for Windows 8.72(Scientific Software International, Inc., 2006)¿Í SAS Ver. 9.1(SAS Institute Inc., 2002)À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© °æ·ÎºÐ¼®À» ¼öÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. µµ½Ã°ø¿øÀÇ °ø±ÞÀÎÀÚÀÇ Æò°¡ °á°ú´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. 1) ¿ÜºÎÀû °ø±ÞÀÎÀÚÀÎ Á¢±Ù¼ºÀÌ ÀÌ¿ë ¸¸Á·µµ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â Á÷Á¢È¿°ú¿Í °£Á¢È¿°ú´Â °¢°¢ 0.184, 0.220À¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. Á¤º¸¿Í ÃËÁøÀÌ ÀÌ¿ë ¸¸Á·µµ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â Á÷Á¢È¿°ú´Â ¾øÀ¸³ª °£Á¢È¿°ú´Â °¢°¢ 0.101, 0.177·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. 2) ³»ºÎÀû °ø±ÞÀÎÀÚÀÎ ¼­ºñ½ºÀÇ Á÷Á¢È¿°ú¿Í °£Á¢È¿°ú´Â °¢°¢ 0.130, 0.236ÀÎ ¹Ý¸é ¸Å·Â¹°ÀÇ Á÷Á¢È¿°ú´Â 0.698·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. 3) µµ½Ã°ø¿ø ÀÌ¿ë ¸¸Á·µµ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â Á¢±Ù¼º, ¼­ºñ½º, ¸Å·Â¹°ÀÇ Á÷Á¢È¿°úÀÇ Å©±â´Â °¢°¢ 0.184, 0.130, 0.698·Î 57.96%¸¦ ±¸¼ºÇÏ´Â ¹Ý¸é, Á¢±Ù¼º, Á¤º¸, ÃËÁø, ¼­ºñ½ºÀÇ °£Á¢È¿°úÀÇ Å©±â´Â °¢°¢ 0.220, 0.101, 0.177, 0.236À¸·Î 42.04%ÀÌ´Ù. 4) µµ½Ã°ø¿øÀÇ °ø±ÞÀÎÀÚµéÀÌ µµ½Ã°ø¿øÀÇ ÀÌ¿ë ¸¸Á·µµ(100.00%)¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ÀΰúÈ¿°úÀÇ Å©±â´Â ¸Å·Â¹°(39.98%), Á¢±Ù¼º(23.14%), ¼­ºñ½º(20.96%), ÃËÁø(10.14%), Á¤º¸(5.78%)ÀÇ ¼øÀÌ´Ù. 5) µµ½Ã°ø¿øÀÇ ¿ÜºÎÀû °ø±ÞÀÎÀÚÀÎ Á¢±Ù¼º, Á¤º¸, ÃËÁøÀÇ È¿°ú´Â 39.06%ÀÎ ¹Ý¸é, ³»ºÎÀû °ø±ÞÀÎÀÚÀÎ ¼­ºñ½º, ¸Å·Â¹°ÀÇ È¿°ú´Â 69.94%·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ¿¬±¸¸¦ ÅëÇØ µµ½Ã°ø¿øÀÇ ¸¶ÄÉÆÃÀü·« ¼ö¸³°ú ±âÁ¸ÀÇ Á¶¼ºµÈ µµ½Ã°ø¿ø °³·® ¹æ¾ÈÀ» ¸¶·ÃÇϴµ¥ À¯¿ëÇÑ Áö½ÄÀ» ¾ò¾ú´Ù. ƯÈ÷, ÀÌ ¿¬±¸¿¡ Àû¿ëµÈ ¹æ¹ý·ÐÀº ¿©Å¸ÀÇ ¿©°¡È°µ¿ Àå¼ÒÀÇ °èȹ°ú ¼³°è¿¡ À¯¿ëÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÈ´Ù. ÀåÂ÷ ´õ ¸¹Àº ÃøÁ¤º¯¼öµéÀ» µµÀÔÇÏ¿© µµ½Ã°ø¿øÀÇ °ø±Þ¿¡ °üÇÑ ±¸Á¶¹æÁ¤½Ä ¸ðÇüÀÇ Á¤¸³°ú µµ½Ã°ø¿øÀÇ Á¾·ùº° °ø±ÞÀÎÀÚ ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Æò°¡°¡ ¿ä±¸µÈ´Ù.
The purpose of this paper is to evaluate supply factors of urban parks to answer the research question: What are the causal effects of supply factors of urban parks on visitor satisfaction? After reviewing the literature and the Korean park planning process, we constructed a conceptual framework and have formulated the hypothesis of this research. We had obtained data through a questionnaire, which surveyed 452 visitors at 8 urban parks in Daegu Metropolitan City in 2008, based on a stratified sampling method. After the elimination of 96 unsuitable samples, we have analyzed the data using descriptive statistical methods, Pearson's correlation analysis and a path analysis method. We have found that: 1) While the direct and indirect effect of accessibility(ACC) on visitor satisfaction(VS) turned out to be 0.184 and 0.220, respectively, the indirect effect of information(IFM) and promotion(PRM) on VS turned out to be 0.101 and 0.177, respectively. 2) While the direct and indirect effect of service(SVR) on VS turned out to be 0.130 and 0.236, respectively, the direct effect of ACC turned out to be 0.698. 3) While the direct effect of ACC, SVR and attraction(ATT) on VS turned out to be 0.184, 0.130 and 0.698, respectively, composing 67.96% of causal effect, the indirect effect of ACC, IFM, PRM and SVR on VS turned out to be 0.220, 0.101, 0.177 and 0.236, respectively, composing 42.04% of causal effect. 4) The magnitude of causal effect of supply factors on VS turned out to be ATT(39.98%), ACC(23.14%), SVR(20.96%), PRM(10.14%) and IFM(5.78%) in order, and 5) the causal effect of external supply factors of ACC, IFM and PRM compose 39.06% of the causal effect while that of the internal supply factors of SVR and ATT is 69.94%. The research results suggest that: 1) Planning for park marketing strategy and remedial directions for existing urban parks, in order to increase visitor satisfaction, be focused on IFM and PRM, especially. 2) The research approach and path analysis method adopted by this research be valid and highly useful for planning and evaluation of other recreation areas. It is recommended that: 1) Structural Equation Model on supply factors of urban parks be established in the future. 2) Evaluation of supply factors by type of urban park be performed.
 
Ű¿öµå
¿ÜºÎÀû °ø±ÞÀÎÀÚ;³»ºÎÀû °ø±ÞÀÎÀÚ;ÀÌ¿ë ¸¸Á·µµ;µµ½Ã°ø¿øÀÇ Æò°¡;External Supply Factors;Internal Supply Factor;Visitor Satisfaction;Evaluation of Urban Park;
 
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸÁö / v.38, no.1, 2010³â, pp.1-11
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1225-1755
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201027463259399)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿