¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ / v.36, no.5, 2008³â, pp.13-25
ÇàÁ¤Á߽ɺ¹ÇÕµµ½Ã Áß¾Ó³ìÁö°ø°£ ±¹Á¦¼³°è°ø¸ð¿¡ ³ªÅ¸³­ ´ëÇü °ø¿øÀÇ ¼³°è Àü·«
( Design Strategies of Large Park in the International Design Competition for Central Open Space in Multi-Functional Administrative City, Korea )
¹Ú±ÙÇö;¹èÁ¤ÇÑ; ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø »ýÅÂÁ¶°æÇÐ;¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Á¶°æ.Áö¿ª½Ã½ºÅÛ°øÇкÎ;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
Àü ¼¼°èÀûÀ¸·Î ´ëÇü °ø¿ø ¼³°è°ø¸ð°¡ ±ÞÁõÇϰí ÀÖÁö¸¸ ÀÌ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Ã¼°èÀû °ËÅä¿Í ºñÆÇÀû ¿¬±¸´Â µå¹°´Ù. ´ëÇ¥ÀûÀÎ ´ëÇü °ø¿ø ¼³°è°ø¸ð¿´´ø ÇàÁ¤Á߽ɺ¹ÇÕµµ½Ã Áß¾Ó³ìÁö°ø°£ ±¹Á¦¼³°è°ø¸ð´Â µ¿½Ã´ë ´ëÇü °ø¿øÀÇ ¼³°è Àü·«À» °íÂûÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ÀÇ¹Ì ÀÖ´Â ¼ÒÀçÀÌ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸´Â °ø¸ðÀüÀÇ Áöħ¼­ ¹× '´ëÇü °ø¿ø'°ú °ü·ÃµÈ ±âÁ¸ÀÇ ¹®Çå ¿¬±¸¸¦ ÅëÇØ ºÐ¼®Æ²À» ¸¶·ÃÇϰí, À̸¦ ¹ÙÅÁÀ¸·Î ¿­°³ÀÇ °á¼±ÀÛÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ºÐ¼®Æ²·Î µµÃâµÈ ³× °¡Áö Áú¹®Àº ´ëÇü °ø¿ø¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Á¢±Ù ¹æ½Ä, ÇÁ·Î¼¼½º ¼³°è, °ø¿øÀÇ Áö¼Ó°¡´É¼º, µµ½Ã¿ÍÀÇ °ü°èÀÌ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ °á°ú´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. ù°, ´ëÇü °ø¿øÀÇ ¼³°è °³³äÀº ÁÖ·Î ´ë»óÁö ³»ºÎÀÇ Æ¯¼º¿¡¼­ ³ª¿Â´Ù. ƯÈ÷ °ø¿øÀÇ Á¤Ã¼¼º È®º¸°¡ ´ëÇü °ø¿ø¿¡¼­´Â Áß¿äÇÏ´Ù. µÑ°, º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ³× °¡Áö Áú¹®À» ¸ðµÎ ¸¸Á·½ÃŲ ¼³°è¾ÈÀº ã±â ¾î·Á¿üÀ¸¸ç, ¿©ÀüÈ÷ ½Ã°¢Àû, ÇüÅÂÁß½ÉÀû, °á°úÁß½ÉÀû ¼³°è°¡ ¸¹¾Ò´Ù. ¼Â°, ´ëÇü °ø¿øÀÇ 'Áö¼Ó°¡´É¼º'Àº »ýÅÂÀû Ãø¸é, ÀçÁ¤Àû Ãø¸é, ÇÁ·Î±×·¥ Ãø¸é, Ä¿¹Â´ÏƼ Ãø¸é µî ´Ù¾çÇÑ Ãø¸éÀ» ¾Æ¿ì¸£´Â Æ÷°ýÀûÀÎ °³³äÀÌ´Ù. ÇÏÁö¸¸ ±× °³³äÀÌ ¾ÆÁ÷ ¸ðÈ£Çϰí, ±¸Ã¼ÀûÀÎ ¿î¿µ ¹× °ü¸® ÇÁ·Î±×·¥µéÀÌ ºÎÁ·ÇÏ´Ù. ³Ý°, ´ëÇü °ø¿øÀº µµ½Ã¿ÍÀÇ °ü°è ¸Î±â¿¡ Àû±ØÀûÀ¸·Î ³ª¼±´Ù. ƯÈ÷, '»ý»êÇÏ´Â °ø¿ø'°ú 'µµ½ÃÀÇ ÀÚ±ÞÀÚÁ·¼º È®º¸'´Â ´ëÇü °ø¿ø¿¡ ¿äûµÇ´Â Áß¿äÇÑ ÇÊ¿äÁ¶°ÇÀÌ´Ù.
Although competitions for large parks are increasing rapidly across the world, theoretical research and critiques of these competitions are as yet insufficient. The 'International Design Competition for Central Open Space in Multi-functional Administrative City, Korea', a representative competition for large park design, can be a significant resource for examining the contemporary design strategies that go into the design of a large park. In this study, the authors make a framework for analysis by looking at the competition's design guidelines and literatures on 'large parks', and by then analyzing the ten finalists. Four questions that were derived from the framework were: 'what are the approaches to large parks?', 'what is the process of design?', 'what is the sustainability of the park?', and 'what are the relations between city and park?' The results of the study are as follows. First, the design concepts for large parks are primarily site-specific. It is particularly important in ensuring the identity of the large park. Second, it is difficult to find design proposals which satisfy the four main questions sufficiently, and works submitted tend to be visual-oriented, form-oriented, and results-centered. Third, the notion of 'sustainability' in large parks is a comprehensive one which includes various aspects such as ecology, finance, programming, and community. However, the notion remains ambiguous, and plans for operation and management are not concretely proposed. Finally, design proposals for large parks accompany positive relations with the city. Especially, 'productive parks' and 'city self-sufficiency' are very important demands in regards to large parks.
 
Ű¿öµå
¼³°è Á¢±Ù ¹æ½Ä;ÇÁ·Î¼¼½º ¼³°è;Áö¼Ó°¡´É¼º;ÀÚ±ÞÀÚÁ·¼º;Design Approaches;Design Process;Sustainability;Self-Sufficiency;
 
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸÁö / v.36, no.5, 2008³â, pp.13-25
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1225-1755
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200806135611992)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿