|
|
|
한국조경학회 / v.24, no.3, 1996년, pp.109-114 
|
주제공원의 규모결정을 위한 재무적 손익모형 II -에버랜드, 서울랜드, 드림랜드 비교-
( 2nd Study : A Financial Model to Select the Size of Theme Park ) |
| 이양주;유병림; 서울대 대학원 협동과정조경학;서울대 환경대학원 환경조경학과;
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
| 초 록 |
|
|
| Generally, the size of our recreation sites is selected through use demand at the peak day. At same time, scale economic and diseconomic are applied to a recreation site. If you are a rational decision-maker, you would like to select the size of your park at profit-maximization point. This study is the first try for modelling a Gain-Loss by the size options of a theme park. For testing the validity of a financial model to select the size of theme parks. Ever-Land, Seoul-Land, Dream-Land's operating size was analyzed. By the size options, the revenue of each park was compared with cost. The profit-maximization point and break-even point of each park were found. Ever-Land and Dream-Land's size was selected between the profit-maximization point and the break-even point. In contrast with Ever-Land and Dream-Land's, Seoul-Land's was selected upper the break-even point. To increase the utility of this model in selecting the size of a theme park, a decision-maker must keep in mind a few limits of this study. That is, 1) this model can not be applied at public parks. 2) Sometimes the others can be more important than financial revenue and cost. Finally, there is the validity of Gain-Loss Model in estimating only the financial revenues and costs through the size options. |
| |
| 키워드 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
한국조경학회지 / v.24, no.3, 1996년, pp.109-114
한국조경학회
ISSN : 1225-1755
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO199611920417727)
언어 : 한국어 |
|
| 논문 제공 : KISTI 한국과학기술정보연구원 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
