|
|
|
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ / v.23, no.1, 1995³â, pp.95-109
|
¿ÜºÎ°ø°£ ¼³°è¿¡ ÀÖ¾î "ÇÁ¶óÀ̹ö½Ã" °³³äÀÇ ÀÀ¿ë ¹× ÃøÁ¤"¸ðµ¨"ÀÇ °³¹ß¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸
( Privacy ; Concept and Estimation Model in Outdoor Space Design ) |
| ¾öºØÈÆ; ´ë±¸È¿¼º°¡Å縯´ë Á¾°æÇаú;
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
| ÃÊ ·Ï |
|
|
| All human spatial behavior and psychological stress are affected by the 'Privacy'of each space. This Paper deals with the theoretical review of 'privacy'concept and establishment of 'Privacy Model' that can be a useful design tool. 'Privacy Index(Pl)' model of 10 point scale, which is based on 'Hierarchic system of Privacy' in urban spaces by Chermeyeff and Alexander(1963), was established as a hypothetical model in this study. And'Activity Suitability', based on each hierarchy of primacy level, was investigated at each site to construct the validity of 'Privacy Model'. Total 67 sites were investigated by on.-site questionnaire in 3 types of outdoor spaces, (Park), (Campus), and (Garden) respectively. The major results are as follows; 1. The P7rivacy level of earth spaces, distributed from to in and . and (Groun Private> spaces are dominant In , spaces are dondnant 2, Privacy level, based on , showed higher privacy level than that of . This means the criteria of each privacy level should be modified for more specific space. The . could be derived from the (Activity Suitability) of each space. 3.The cognition of privacy level. by user group, showed no significant difference in dach group by sex, age, education, and job, respectively |
| |
| Ű¿öµå |
|
| |
|
|
 |
|
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸÁö / v.23, no.1, 1995³â, pp.95-109
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1225-1755
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO199511920951295)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î |
|
| ³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|
|