|
|
|
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ / v.33, no.4, 2005³â, pp.119-128
|
Çü±¤µî°ú ÀÚ¿¬±¤ÀÇ ±¤µµ¿¡ µû¸¥ ½Ç³»Á¶°æ½Ä¹°ÀÇ »ýÀ°¹ÝÀÀ°ú µµÀÔ ¹æ¾È
( Growth Responses and Introduction Plan of Interior Landscape Plants under Light Intensity of Fluorescent Light and Sunlight ) |
| ÃÖ°æ¿Á;ÀÌ»ó¿ì; ÁøÁÖ»ê¾÷´ëÇб³ ¿ø¿¹Çаú;ÁøÁÖ»ê¾÷´ëÇб³ ¿ø¿¹Çаú;
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
| ÃÊ ·Ï |
|
|
| This study was carried out to obtain fundamental information of growth response of interior landscape plants under a fluorescent lighting, a sunlight at indoor. Ficus elastica Roxb. vu. decora Hort, Spathiphyllum 'Clevelandii', Codiaeum variegatum Blume var. pictum Mvell. Arg. 'Exalant' and Cordyline terminalis Kunth var. red edge Hort were examined under 100lux, 500lux, 1,000lux and 2,000lux light intensity consisted of fluorescent lighting and sunlight at indoor condition. Result of experiments are as follows; 1. A Ficus elastica Roxb. var. decora Hort plant growth status was better showed under fluorescent lighting than sunlight. A plant growth status showed the best result under 2,000lux light intensity of fluorescent lighting in cases of all conditions. 2. A Spathiphyllum 'Clevelandii' showed the best effective adaptations under law intensity among experimental plants. A Spathiphyllum 'Clevelandii', plant growth status was better showed under fluorescent lighting than sunlight. A plant growth status showed the best result under 1,000lux light intensity of fluorescent lighting in cases of all conditions. 3. It need the best high establishment of fluorescent lighting among experimental plants for good plant growth. A Codiaeum variegatum Blume var. pictum Mvell. Arg. 'Exalant' plant growth status was better showed under fluorescent lighting than sunlight. A plant growth status was better showed under high light intensity in case of same light source. A plant growth status showed the best result under 2,000lux light intensity of fluorescent lighting. 4. A Cordyline terminalis Kunth var. red edge Hort plant growth status was better showed under fluorescent lighting than sunlight. but, A plant growth status was better showed under $500luxsim1,000lux$ than 2,000lux in cases of all intensity of fluorescent lighting. while, A plant growth status was better showed under $1,000luxsim2,000lux$ in cases of all intensity of sunlight. |
| |
| Ű¿öµå |
| Light Source;Interior Plant;Interior Plant Growth; |
| |
|
|
 |
|
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸÁö / v.33, no.4, 2005³â, pp.119-128
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1225-1755
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200518718234136)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î |
|
| ³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|
|