¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ / v.34, no.4, 2006³â, pp.69-83
ÇÏõº¹¿ø°èȹÀ» À§ÇÑ »ýŰæ°ü Æò°¡: ÀüºÏ ¸¸°æ°­ »ó·ùÁö¿ªÀ» »ç·Ê·Î
( Ecological Landscape Evaluation for the Planning of River Rehabilitation: The Upper Areas at the Mangyeong River in Jeollabukdo, Korea )
À̸í¿ì; ÀüºÏ´ëÇб³ Á¶°æÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
±Ù·¡¿¡ µé¾î ÀÚ¿¬È¯°æÀÇ º¹¿øÀº ¿ì¸®³ª¶óÀÇ ÇÏõ °ü¸®¿¡¼­ Áß¿äÇÑ °èȹ°úÁ¦ÀÇ ÇϳªÀÌ´Ù. °èȹ°úÁ¤¿¡ À־ °æ°üÀÇ ºÐ¼®°ú Æò°¡´Â º¸Àü Áö¿ª ¹× °³¹ß Áö¿ªÀÇ ÀûÁö¼±Á¤À» À§ÇÏ¿© ¸Å¿ì Áß¿äÇÑ ´Ü°èÀÌ´Ù. ÀÌ ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº »ýŰæ°ü ´ÜÀ§¿¡ À־ »ýÅÂȯ°æºÐ¾ßº° Á¶»ç Ư¼ºÀ» ¹Ý¿µÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â À§°èÀû ¹æ¹ý·ÐÀÇ ¼ö¸³°ú ÀÌ¿¡ ±âÃÊÇÑ ÀûÁöºÐ¼®À» ÅëÇØ¼­ ÇÏõ³» º¸Àü Áö¿ªÀ» ¼³Á¤ÇÏ´Â µ¥ ÀÖ´Ù. °æ°ü Æò°¡ °úÁ¤¿¡¼­ °æ°ü ½ºÄÉÀÏÀº ±¤¿ª½ºÄÉÀÏ, Áö¿ª½ºÄÉÀÏ, ±¹Áö½ºÄÉÀÏ·Î ±¸ºÐÇÏ¿© Àû¿ëÇÒ Çʿ䰡 ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ÀÌ¿¡ µû¶ó ȯ°æÀÚ·áµéÀÌ ¼öÁý, ºÐ¼®, Á¾ÇյȴÙ. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ 3´Ü°èÀÇ ´ÜÀ§°³³äÀÌ µµÀԵǾî¾ß ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀº ÇÏõÄÚ¸®µµ¿¡¼­ º¸ÀüÁö ¼³Á¤À» À§ÇØ »ýÅ ÀÚ·áµéÀÇ ´Ù¿øÀû ¼º°ÝÀ» Æò°¡Çϱâ À§ÇÑ °ÍÀÌ´Ù. À§°èÀû ½ºÄÉÀÏ¿¡ µû¸¥ Æò°¡°úÁ¤Àº 3´Ü°è·Î ±¸ºÐµÇ¾î ¼öÇàµÇ¾ú´Ù. ù ¹øÂ°´Â Àå°Å¸® °æ°ü ´ÜÀ§·Î¼­ ±¤¿ªÀû °³³ä¿¡¼­ ÇÏÃµÆøÀ» ±âÁØÀ¸·Î ¼³Á¤µÇ¾ú´Ù. µÎ ¹øÂ°´Â °¢°¢ÀÇ Àå°Å¸® °æ°ü ´ÜÀ§ÀÇ Áö¿ªÀû °³³ä¿¡¼­ °æ°üÀÇ µ¿Áú¼ºÀ» ±âÁØÀ¸·Î 2ÀÌ»óÀÇ ´ÜÀ§°ø°£À¸·Î ±¸ºÐµÇ¾ú´Ù. ¼¼ ¹øÂ°´Â ±¹ÁöÀû °³³ä¿¡¼­ ±³°¢, ´Ù¸®, º¸ÀÇ À§Ä¡¿¡ µû¶ó ¼¼ºÐÀûÀ¸·Î ºÐ·ùµÇ¾ú´Ù. ÀÌ ¸¶Áö¸·À¸·Î ºÐ·ùµÈ ±¹ÁöÀû ´ÜÀ§¸¦ ±âÁØÀ¸·Î ÇÏ¿© »ýÅÂȯ°æ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀڷḦ ÀçÃëÇÕ, ºÐ¼®Çϱâ À§ÇÑ °³³äÀû ÀûÁöºÐ¼®¸ðÇüÀÇ Ç׸ñµéÀ» ¼±Á¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÃÖÁ¾ °á°ú¿¡¼­´Â ÇÏõ ³» ½ÀÁö»ýÅÂÇнÀ°ø°£À¸·Î¼­ ÁýÁßÀûÀ¸·Î °ü¸®µÇ¾î¾ß ÇÒ ÀáÀç·ÂÀÌ ÀÖ´Â Àå¼Ò·Î¼­ 3°³¼ÒÀÇ º¸Àü Áö¿ªÀÌ ¼³Á¤µÇ¾ú´Ù. ÀûÁöºÐ¼®°úÁ¤ÀÌ ³»Æ÷Çϰí ÀÖ´Â ¸¹Àº °¡Á¤¿¡µµ ºÒ±¸Çϰí, ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¹æ¹ý·ÐÀû Á¦¾ÈÀº ¿ì¸®³ª¶óÀÇ ÇÏõº¹¿ø°èȹ¿¡¼­ ´Ù¿øÈ­µÈ Àü¹®°¡µé°úÀÇ °øÅëÀû Åä·ÐÀ» ÅëÇØ »ýÅ Á¤º¸µéÀ» ÅëÇÕÇÏ¿© ½ÇõÀûÀ¸·Î Àû¿ëÇÒ ¼ö Àִ ƲÀ» Á¦°øÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¸®¶ó°í ±â´ëÇÑ´Ù.ÀÇ ¹üÁÖ¿¡ Æ÷ÇÔµÇ¸ç ³²¼­ºÎ ÀϺ»ÀÇ Å¥½´(Kyushu)¼¶¿¡¼­ ³ªÅ¸³ª´Â È­°­¾Ïü¿Í À¯»çÇÑ adakiticÇÑ ÁöÈ­ÇÐÀû Ư¼ºÀ» ³ªÅ¸³½´Ù. Áö±¸Á¶ ÆÇº°µµ ¹× AUK vs. ACNKµµ¿¡ Á¡½ÃÇØº» °á°ú I-typeÀÇ È­°­¾ÏÀ¸·Î Áö±¸Á¶Àû ȯ°æÀº È­»êȣȭ °­¾Ï(VAG) ¿µ¿ª¿¡ ÇØ´çµÈ´Ù. ÀÌ °á°ú·Î ¹Ì·ç¾î Áøµ¿È­°­¾Ï·ù´Â Áß»ý´ë ¹é¾Ç±â ÀÌÀÚ³ª±âÆÇÀÇ ¼·ÀÔ°ú °ü·ÃµÇ¾î °üÀÔÇÑ ´ë·úÁÖº¯ºÎ ȯ°æ¿¡¼­ »ý¼ºµÇ¾úÀ½À» ½Ã»çÇÑ´Ù.À̸ç Á¦ÀÛµÈ ADCÀÇ Ä¨ ¸éÀûÀº $0.8mm^2$ÀÌ´Ù.quential scan) ¾Ë°í¸®Áò°ú ¼º´ÉÀ» ºñ±³ÇÑ´Ù. ½ÇÇè°á°ú, Á¦¾ÈµÈ ¾Ë°í¸®ÁòÀº ¼øÂ÷ °Ë»ö¿¡ ºñÇÏ¿© ÃÖ´ë 13.2¹è±îÁö ¼º´ÉÀÌ Çâ»óµÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, À妽ºÀÇ °³¼ö k°¡ Áõ°¡ÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó °Ë»ö ¼º´Éµµ ÇÔ²² Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù.¶ó¼­ º¸´Ù ¾ÈÀü¼º°ú È¿À²¼ºÀÌ ¶Ù¾î³­ 2Â÷ ´ë»ç¹°ÁúÀ» ã¾Æ³»´Â ¿¬±¸¿Í ¾Æ¿ï·¯ ¹æÁ¦±â´ÉÀÌ ÀÖ´Â ¹°ÁúÀÇ »ýÇÕ¼º°æ·Î¸¦ ±¸¸íÇÏ°í ´ë»ç°øÇÐÀûÀ¸·Î ÀÌ¿ëÇϹǷΠº´ÇØÃæ¿¡ ÀúÇ×¼ºÀÌ ÀÖ°í ÀâÃÊ ¹æÁ¦È¿°ú¸¦ °®´Â ÇüÁúÀüȯ ½Ä¹°À» À°¼ºÇÏ´Â ¿¬±¸°¡ Áö¼ÓÀûÀ¸·Î ÀÌ·ç¾îÁ®¾ß ÇÒ °ÍÀÌ´Ù.{sim}83.8%$ ¹üÀ§(ÛôêÌ)¸¦ Â÷Áö ÇÏ¿´´Ù. 5) Ä®½· ¼·Ãë·®(àîö¢Õá)Àº ±ÇÀå·® 500 mg ¿¡ ºñ(Ýï)ÇÏ¿© ¾ç±¸Áö¿ª(åÅÏ¢ò¢æ´) ¾Æµ¿(ä®ÔÛ)ÀÌ $282.4{sim}355.0mg$À̾ú°í ¿©ÁÖÁö¿ª(æ°ñ¶ò¢æ´) ¾Æµ¿(ä®ÔÛ)ÀÌ $284.6{sim}429.0mg$ À̾ú´Ù. 6) ö(ôÑ) ¼·Ãë·®(àîö¢Õá)Àº ±ÇÀå·® 10mg¿¡ ºñ(Ýï)ÇÏ¿© ¾ç±¸Áö¿ª(åÅÏ¢ò¢æ´) ¾Æµ¿(ä®ÔÛ)ÀÌ $6.0{sim}12.1mg$ ¹üÀ§(ÛôêÌ)À̾ú°í ¿©ÁÖÁö¿ª(æ°ñ¶ò¢æ´) ¾Æµ¿(ä®ÔÛ)ÀÌ $6.4{sim}16.7mg$
Nature rehabilitation has become a major theme in river management in South Korea. An analysis and evaluation of the landscape is a crucial step to select the suitable tracts for developing or conserving land use in the process of landscape planning. The purpose of this paper is to establish a hierarchical procedure for the setting of the landscape units on the various scales at which field biologists performed their observations and to select the preserves through by a suitability model for synthesizing the ecological empirical, and biophysical data. An evaluation process needs to be performed according to the landscape scales: site, local, and regional scales, at which the environmental data were collected, analyzed, and synthesized. Introducing of three level scales was crucially necessary for evaluating the various multi level ecological data for zoning of preserves in river corridors. The evaluation level at different scales are hierarchically established into three phases. The first evaluation phase can be performed by the long length units defined by the ranges of stream widths at regional scale. Secondly, each of these long units can be divided into two or more segments according to its landscape homogeneity at local level. Finally the segments at the last phase can be designated according to the location of the reservoir weirs and bridges at site level. The conceptual model components are adopted for collecting, evaluating, and interpreting the biological and abiotic data at site level. Three preserves are selected, having high potentials for being intensely managed as the Ecological Education Areas in the river. Despite a lot of assumption the results are expected to facilitate discussion and decision making about which frameworks of evaluation are desirable and adaptable for integrating the ecological data into the rehabilitation design process in South Korea.
 
Ű¿öµå
°æ°ü ´ÜÀ§;ÇÏõÄÚ¸®µµ;º¸Àü¿ëÁö;°æ°ü½ºÄÉÀÏ;Æò°¡°úÁ¤;»ýÅÂÁ¤º¸ÅëÇÕ °³³ä¸ðÇü;Landscape Units;River Corridors;Zoning for Preserves;Landscape Scales;Evaluation Process;Conceptual Model for Synthesizing the Ecological Data;
 
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸÁö / v.34, no.4, 2006³â, pp.69-83
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1225-1755
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200604623619021)
¾ð¾î : ¿µ¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿