|
|
|
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ / v.15, no.1, 1987³â, pp.39-67
|
»ï¸²°æ°ü¿¡ °üÇÑ °è·®Àû ºÐ¼®¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸
( A Study on the Quantitative Analysis for the Forest Landscape ) |
| ¼ÁÖȯ; °æÈñ´ëÇб³ »ê¾÷´ëÇÐ Á¶°æÇаú;
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
| ÃÊ ·Ï |
| »ï¸²°æ°üÁöÀÇ ¹°¸®Àû ȯ°æÀÌ Áö´Ñ ½Ã°¢Àû ÁúÀ» °è·®Àû Á¢±Ù¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿© ȯ°æ¼³°è¿¡ °´°üÈµÈ ±âÃÊÀڷḦ Á¦½ÃÇϰíÀÚ, ÀÚ¿¬»ï¸²°æ°üÀÇ °æ°ü°¡Ä¡¸¦ Iveson ¹ý¿¡ ÀÇÇÏ¿© Æò°¡Çϰí, »ï¸²³» ÁÖ¸®¿ë°ø°£¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿©´Â S.D ScaleÀ» ÃøÁ¤Çϰí, ÀÎÀںм® AlgorithmÀ» ÅëÇÏ¿© À̹ÌÁö ±¸È£¸¦ ¹àÇûÀ¸¸ç, ½Ã°¢Àû ¼±È£¼º ¹× S.B.E Method¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ½Ã°¢Àû ¼±È£µµ¸¦ ÆÄ¾ÇÇÑ °á°ú´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. 1. Iverson ÀÎÀÚ I°ú IV°¡ ³ôÀº Ä¡¸¦ º¸ÀÌ´Â ÁöÁ¡Àϼö·Ï °æ°üÀÇ °¡Ä¡¼øÀ§°¡ ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç, Àΰø±¸Á¶¹°ÀÌ °øÀÜÀûÀ¸·Î ÀϰüµÈ ¸Æ¶ôÀ» À¯ÁöÇÏ´Â ºÐ¹è¿Í ¿¬Á¾ÀÇ »ó°ü°ü°è¸¦ º¸ÀÌÁö ¾Ê°í ÀÌÁúÀûÀ¸·Î ÀÛ¿ëÇÏ´Â ÁöÁ¡¿¡¼´Â ³·Àº Ä¡¸¦ º¸¿´´Ù. Àΰø¿ä¼Ò¸¦ ÀÚ¿¬°æ°ü¿ä¼Ò¿¡ µ¿ÁúÀûÀ¸·Î À¶ÇÕ½ÃÄÑ Iverson ÀÎÀÚ IVÀÇ ÃøÁ¤Ä¡¸¦ ³ôÀÌ´Â ¼³°è±â¹ýÀÌ Áß¿äÇÏ´Ù ÇϰڴÙ. 2. °¢ Á¶»çÁöÁ¡ °øÈ÷ °èÀý¿¡ µû¸¥ S.D. Scale Ä¡ÀÇ Â÷À̰¡ ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç, »ï¸²°æ°üÁö¿¡¼ Àΰø±¸Á¶¹°ÀÌ º¸¿ÏÀû, À¶ÇÕÀûÀ¸·Î ÀÛ¿ëÇÏ´Â °ø°£¿¡¼´Â ½Ã°¢Àû ¿¬¼Ó¼º ±¸Á¶¹°ÀÇ ÇüÅÂÀû °£°á¼º °Á¶¼º ÀÌÁú¿ä¼ÒÀÇ ÅëÀϼº ¹× µ¿È¼º µîÀÇ ¾îÀǹ̺Ðôµµ°¡ À̹ÌÁöÀÇ ÁÖ¼ººÐ¼® º¯¼ö·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. 3. »ï¸²°æ°üÁöÀÇ °ø°£ À̹ÌÁö¸¦ ÇÔÃàÇÏ´Â º¯ÀÎÀº Á¾ÇÕÆò°¡, °³¼º, Á¤¿¬¼º, ¿ª·®¼º, ǰ°Ý, Ä£±Ù°¨ ¹× °ø°£±Ô¸ð µî 7°³ÀÇ ÀÎÀÚ±ºÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, ÀÎÀÚ¼ö Á¦¾î¹æ¹ý¿¡ ÀÇÇÏ¿© T.V. ´Â 45.32%·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. 4. ¸ðµç °èÀý °øÈ÷ °³¼º, ǰ°Ý, Á¤¿¬¼º, ¿ª·®¼º ¹× Ä£±Ù°¨ÀÇ ÀÎÀÚ°¡ ³ôÀº Factor Score¸¦ º¸¿©, »ï¸²°æ°üÁöÀÇ °èÀýÀû °ø°£À̹ÌÁö¸¦ ´ëÇ¥ÇÏ´Â ÀÎÀÚ±ºÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç, °¢ °ø°£ À̹ÌÁöÀÇ ÁÖÀÎÀÚ ¹× °èÀýº° À̹ÌÁö Â÷À̸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»´Â ÀÎÀÚ´Â °¢ÁöÁ¡°£ ³ôÀº À¯ÀǼºÀ» º¸¿´´Ù. 5. ¼ºº°¿¡ µû¸¥ Factor ScoreÀÇ Â÷ÀÌ´Â »ï¸²°æ°üÁö¿¡ ´ëÇÑ À̹ÌÁö Áß Á¾ÇÕÆò°¡¿Í °³¼º Â÷¿ø¿¡¼¸¸ ÀÎÁ¤µÇ¾ú°í, ¿¬·É¿¡ µû¸¥ Â÷ÀÌ´Â 30´ë ÀÌÇÏ¿Í 40´ë À̻󰣿¡ ÇöÀúÇÑ Â÷À̸¦ º¸¿´À¸¸ç, Çз¿¡ µû¸¥ À¯ÀǼºµµ ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. Á÷¾÷°£ÀÇ À¯ÀǼºÀº Çлý°ú Ÿ Á÷¾÷°£¿¡ ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. Á÷¾÷°£ÀÇ À¯ÀǼºÀº Çлý°ú Ÿ Á÷¾÷°£¿¡ Çö°ÝÇÏ°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸³ª, °³ÀÎÂ÷¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»´Â ¼Ó¼ºÀû º¯¼ö´Â »óÈ£º¸¿ÏÀûÀÎ º¯¼ö±â´ÉÀ» ¼öÇàÇϰí Àֱ⠶§¹®¿¡ ´Ù¾çÇÑ ÇൿÀÇ ¼³¸í·ÂÀÖ´Â ÀÌÀ¯·Î º¼ ¼ö ¾ø´Ù. |
|
| The purpose of this thesis is to suggest objective basic data for the environmental design through the quantitative analysis of the visual quality included in the physical environment of forest landscape. For this, landscape values of forest landscape have been evaluated by using the Iverson method, the images structure of forest landscape's main utilizing space have been analysed by the factor analysis algorithm, degree of visual preferences have been pleasured mainly by questionnaries and SBE method, and finally these thesis can be summarized as fallow LCP with high values of Iverson factors I and IV yield high landscape value. Specifically, Iverson factor IV has been found to play the dominant. For all experimental points, significant seasonal variations in S.D. scale values have been observed. In natural parks, where artificial structures are complementary to the natural landscape, main factors of image are S.D. scales such as the visual sequence, the formal simplicity of structures, the emphasis, the unification of heterogeneous factors and the assimilation. Factors covering the spatial image of natural parks have been found to be the overall evaluation, the individual characteristics, the tidiness, the potentiality, the dignity, the intimacy and the space volume. For all seasons, factors such as the individual characteristics, the dignity, the tidiness, the potentiality, yield high factor scores. As for factors determining the degree of visual preference, variables such as the summit, the skyline, rocks, the water and the degree of natural destruction by artificial structures yield high values for all seasons. |
| |
| Ű¿öµå |
|
| |
|
|
 |
|
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸÁö / v.15, no.1, 1987³â, pp.39-67
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1225-1755
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO198711920955995)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î |
|
| ³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|
|